The Debt Ceiling
Posted May 16, 2011
Will there be “extremely dire consequences”, as Ben Bernanke warns, if
Congress does not raise the debt ceiling? His position is supported by many
Democrats, and even some Republicans, in the House and Senate. So why not just
charge a few more trillion dollars? What’s the big deal! We all do it with our
Our current generation of politicians, federal, state, and local, think it’s
no big deal to use other people’s money to buy votes for themselves; thus
jeopardizing the security of future generations. However, what they will not
admit is that at some point we have to pay back what’s been borrowed. I do; you
do; and our government does too.
According to a recent IBD/TIPP Poll, 63% of Americans oppose legislation to
raise the debt ceiling; and that’s broken out 43% Democrat, 78% Republican, and
70% Independent. So when will our government elite start to listen to the people
they are supposed to serve?
How many of you reading this blog would think that the only way to get
yourself out of debt is to borrow and spend more? Is that the way you run your
I have to admit, that’s the way I ran my family when we first started out. I
was taught this by my father. If you want something and you don’t have the money
for it, then just put it on your credit card. However, after a number of years I
realized I could never pay off the credit card debt by just making the minimum
monthly payments; and I didn’t earn enough to pay the debt down any faster.
One day, for yucks, I ran a spreadsheet to determine how long it would take
me to pay down my debt. I was surprised to find out it would take about 35
years; and that assumes I never charged another thing again. If I could have
told my employer to pay me more money every week I would have; but I was smart
enough to know that my boss would laugh me out of his office.
So I cut up all of our credit cards, except one for true emergencies,
tightened our belts, and paid off the credit cards completely. It took a while.
When we paid them all off we were quite ecstatic. Now we don’t buy anything
unless we have the money to pay for it. The government should do the same.
So when our government officials tell us there will be “extremely dire
consequences” if we don’t raise the debt limit, it’s me that’s laughing. Does
Mr. Bernanke think I’m a fool? I have been there and done that. I know that once
in, there is no way out of borrowing unless you cut up your credit cards.
So then what do we do? The first thing that has to be done is to guarantee
our creditors that we will pay the interest and principle on our debt first,
before any other payment. That will keep our credit rating from getting any
worse that it already is. Then we need to prioritize our expenses. Social
Security and Medicare have to come first, because the government has to honor
their commitments made to the elderly for all their working years paying into
the system. Second, we need to make sure we pay all the current government
employees; although, cutting their numbers is the most prudent step to take.
Third, I would also honor the pensions of all the retired and soon to be retired
government employees; and put the rest on a sliding scale based on a higher
percentage for the longest in service downward. After that, I think everything
else would be up for grabs.
The rest of our expenses would need to be prioritized from top to bottom,
most important to least important. Assuming no new revenues, that is taxes, then
any program or project on the list after the money runs out would need to be
cancelled. Finally, all new revenues generated by positive economic growth would
need to go towards the principle until the debt is fully paid off.
This is not easy to do; but it is what everyone of us does to manage our own
house prudently. We would also notice a number of interesting side effects: our
economy would pick up and more new private sector jobs would become available,
thereby lowering unemployment.
Posted May 20, 2011
In Thursday’s Mideast speech Mr. Obama endorsed the Palestinian demand for a
state based on pre-1967 borders. His statement, however, is a direct
contradiction of the US commitment made in 2004 that Israel would not have to
withdraw from its hard won boundaries after the 1967 war. This US commitment was
made by then President Bush, the US House of Representatives, and the US Senate
in a combined statement.
Maybe it’s time for the House and the Senate to speak up again so the
American people can see where they stand on this issue. But wait, we’re
beginning the start of the 2012 election cycle, so maybe our political elite
would like to wait until 2013 to say something definitive. After all, Democrats
can’t speak against Israel, since the US Jewish population is a large Democrat
Party voting block. And if they speak openly against Mr. Obama they risk loosing
the 2012 Presidential election to a Republican.
It’s tough being a politician these days. Maybe it’s time for some perky
sound bites along with pictures of them kissing babies.
Should Mr. Obama be speaking out about another country’s problems, when the
US is facing some of its biggest issues in the last 50 years? I’d like to hear
Mr. Obama’s plans to fix unemployment in the private sector, or his plans to
bring down the rising food and gasoline prices throughout the country, or his
plans to bring profitability back to small and regional businesses, or maybe
even his plans on how to stop stealing the US taxpayer’s money to give to
cronies in this country and internationally.
It’s tough being President when people won’t leave you alone to destroy the
US in peace. In my estimation, Mr. Obama is the worst President in US history.
I was thinking. Uh Oh! There I go thinking for myself again. Well, please
stay with me for a minute longer.
If Mr. Obama wants Israel to give back the spoils of the 1967 war; a war in
which Israel was only defending herself against attacking aggressors, then
what’s the next step? Does Mr. Obama want the US to give back the southwest to
Mexico? Or the West to the American Indians? Or the Louisiana Purchase to
France? Or the Floridas to Spain? Or maybe even the original 13 colonies to
Where does the madness end? Oh wait, one more. Maybe the US should advocate
giving Mr. Obama back to Kenya, or to Indonesia?
Is Today The Day?
Posted May 21, 2011
Today is the day, according to Harold Camping, that all Christian believers
“will be plucked from the earth,“ raptured, to meet Jesus Christ face to face.
This is the day that all who follow Him, all who believe He was raised from the
dead and confess His name, look forward to every day of our Christian life. It
is our promised hope.
The problem I have with Mr. Camping’s prediction is it cannot be supported by
Scripture. Yes, Jesus will return to rapture His church; but Scripture tells
that it is not for us to know the times or the seasons of His return. So if
anyone says they know the time, that is the day, they cannot be correct. Unless
of course you do not believe that Scripture is God breathed and inerrant.
We cannot believe that both Mr. Camping and Scripture are correct, as they
are contradictory. We can only believe one. Which do you want to believe?
On one hand, the Bible has a perfect record. God, through Scripture,
predicted correctly the time of Christ’s birth, the place of His birth, that His
mother would be a virgin and His father would be God, that He would be the son
of David, and that He would live a sinless life, die for the sins of the people,
die with the wicked, and be buried with the rich, and much more. Jesus Himself
predicted correctly that He would be crucified, in the ground three days and
three nights, and raised on the third day.
On the other hand, Mr. Camping has a tarnished track record in predicting
Christ’s return. In 1992 he predicted that Jesus would return to rapture His
church in September 1994. When that didn’t happen he cited mathematical errors.
When Jesus doesn’t return today, what will be Mr. Camping’s excuse?
Mr. Camping should consider himself very fortunate that he doesn’t live in
Old Testament times; anyone who spoke in God’s name, and it didn’t come true,
would be required by God’s Law to be put to death. Fortunately for him we live
in New Testament times and are under grace, so that our transgressions of God’s
Law may be forgiven.
Now, I always have to remind myself that God is God, and He can choose to do
anything He desires. It is very possible that Jesus will return today. Let’s see
what happens when the day is over and tomorrow comes.
Mr. Camping’s predictions are very dangerous because they have the power to
mislead those who are weak in Christ into following incorrect teaching. As
teachers of God’s word we are held to a higher standard. We must teach what is
true to Scripture, and are held accountable to God for those we lead astray by
Teaching God’s word is a responsibility not to be entered into lightly. We
are all held to account for what we do in the body, and we don’t want to be the
cause for anyone to stumble.
As a believer and follower of Christ Mr. Camping has a responsibility to
remain humble before the living God of all creation. When that humility and
devotion to the inerrant word of God has been abandoned, Mr. Camping is
expected, as we all are, to seek the forgiveness of God. He then must ask his
followers and employees for forgiveness as well. Just as every true follower of
Christ does when we go against His teachings.
I do it with a grateful heart, knowing that Christ has forgiven me, and
continues to forgive all my unrighteous acts when I ask Him.
Yesterday Wasn’t The Day!
Posted May 22, 2011
Well, I’m still here. So were all the people and pastors at church this
morning. And I didn’t read of any unexplainable disappearances of people online
this morning. Maybe Mr. Camping will explain why the rapture of the Christian
church didn’t happen yesterday.
In fact, yesterday was seemingly uneventful, except for the eruption of a
powerful volcano in Iceland, and a 3.6 earthquake in San Francisco. Just a
Mr. Camping should be ashamed of himself for misleading people the way he
did. My heart and my prayers go out to those followers who sold off everything
they had expecting his prediction of the rapture to happen yesterday.
I will be interested to hear his explanation this time for his erroneous
prediction. I hope and pray that God will teach Mr. Camping to do justly, and to
love mercy, and to walk humbly with his God, Jesus Christ.
Fly the friendly skies. Groping free!
Posted May 27, 2011
It’s coming up on the 10th anniversary of the September 11th attack on our
country. An attack so egregious, at that time, so as to unite the entire nation
against the Muslim attackers, and against the countries that supported their
Unfortunately the same type of attack on our freedom and liberty continues
today. It is an attack perpetrated by our own government, by the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) under the leadership of Janet Napolitano. An
attack in the name of homeland security.
It is an horrific attack on our liberty when elderly women and young children
are sexually molested, in the name of airline travel security, and Middle
Eastern men are allowed to pass unchallenged. The same types of airline security
checks are successfully accomplished by other countries without the need to
sexually grope the passengers; and without the need to take sexually explicit
pictures of them.
So what is it about the TSA agents who seem to take pleasure in their job?
And why aren’t more people outraged about their behavior? How can we continue to
allow the government that was set up to protect us from foreign insurgents
blatantly abuse it citizens in this way?
Patrick Henry’s worst fears about the unchecked powers of the federal
government have come true. If we the people don’t turn back the tide of
progressive federalism’s abuse of power, then we deserve all the continued
growth of government oppression we get.
The time has come for every freedom loving individual in this country to
stand up and speak out against the federal government’s erosion of our personal
freedom and liberty. If we don’t, it will only get worse.
It’s time again for Patrick Henry’s battle cry. “Give me liberty, or give me
Posted May 28, 2011
My wife and I went to see Atlas Shrugged the day it opened in the theaters,
and I have been thinking about it ever since. We both read the book a long time
ago, and we both thought the message was right on then. But sitting in the
theater, watching Ayn Rand’s portrayal of the politicians’ behind the scenes
duplicity, I couldn’t help think how prescient the author was. Somehow from her
1957 vantage point she captured perfectly the essence of Obama, Reid, Pelosi,
Boehner, and the establishment Democrats and Republicans.
Mr. Obama and the Democrats say that the only way to fix our national
financial woes is to continue the insanity of taxing the rich and spending
obscene amounts of money to level the playing field. Democrats say Republicans
only want to dismantle safety net programs, like helping students pay for
college and helping adults relying on Medicare. Mr. Obama and the Democrats are
great community activists; they learned their trade well. Their discourse is
intended to inflame the hearts of liberals, and others who don’t think about the
consequences of what’s actually said.
Conservatives are not for dismantling anything, other than the destructive
spending practices of the modern day progressives. No one is saying that
students have to forego college, or adults have to forego medical care. If we
were able to run the numbers we would find that college, Medicare, Social
Security, and the like aren’t the lion’s share of the issue.
The issue is in the enormous federal bureaucracy, their salaries, pensions,
and other benefits, and in fighting wars to prop up or tear down other
countries’ leaders, and in giving money to countries who would bomb our cities
at the slightest opportunity, and in paying down the interest for our $14
At the time of our country’s founding, England had spent too much money on
battle and on protecting her colonial interests abroad. The case in point is the
1757 French and Indian War, after which the King and Parliament needed to raise
money to pay down their large and growing debt. So they tried taxing the
American colonies in various ways, and we all know how that turned out.
It used to be that people went into the public sector to serve their country,
not to get rich. Benjamin Franklin took no salary as the head of the
Pennsylvania government, and George Washington did the same as Commander in
Chief during the Revolutionary War, and also as President.
Maybe it’s time to limit public workers salaries, including politicians, to
no more that the median salary in the country, limit their total annual expenses
to no more than 10% of their salary, limit their other moneys earned while
serving to 10% of their annual salary, and limit their after service benefits to
one year for every four years served. Oh yes, we should also limit all public
service to no more than twelve years total, counting all public jobs held during
We need to stand up against any additional taxes levied by our government. We
also need to boldly tell our federal and state politicians, who really work for
us, to immediately stop any additional spending and to begin to reduce the debt
to zero over the next 10 years. And finally, all budgets should be limited to
funds raised, except in times of extreme emergency.
Reducing taxes, spending, and debt will bring our exceptional entrepreneurs
out from hiding to grow the total number of available private sector jobs, and
thereby grow the economic stability of our country. Then the tax base would
grow. It’s a win-win scenario.
Edmund Burke was right, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is
that good men do nothing.“ It’s time to take a stand against excessive taxing
Posted May 30, 2011
Today is the day we have set aside to commemorate the lives of the brave men
and women who gave the ultimate sacrifice for their country, their lives for our
These great men and women will never be remembered by name, except to the
ones who knew then in life, who loved them dearly, and fought side by side with
them. Even if I could come up with the name of everyone who died since the
Revolutionary War protecting the freedom and liberty we all share today, it
would take much too long to speak all of their names to you. So I will speak
only one name for all of them: Hero.
Every one of these heroes gave their life so that you and I could live free
from domination and oppression. This is something everyone of us takes for
granted. The last time we had another country to answer to for our freedom and
liberty and laws was back before the Revolutionary War.
At that time, England imposed unreasonable taxes on businesses and
individuals already struggling to survive in an economy not doing very well.
England also imposed unreasonable laws that allowed them to take over anyone’s
property to quarter and feed their troops in the Colonies.
Has anything really changed? Today we have replaced England with our very own
federal and state governments. Now they tax businesses and individuals
unreasonably, and they take away our property under the “laws” of eminent
domain, while potentially allowing foreign insurgents to illegally enter our
country through its unprotected porous borders.
Today is the day to remember and honor the memories of all those who gave
their lives to protect our freedoms. Today is also the day to ask some serious
questions about our future.
When will we stop giving away those freedoms that were bough with the blood
Where are today’s heroes who will stand up to our bloated federal and state
governments, and to the fat cat politicians who are getting rich at the people’s
When will all those who have remained silent for far too long finally stand
up and say “No more!”?
In the name of our fallen heroes, God bless America.
It’s not about default
Posted May 31, 2011
When it comes to the issue of raising our national debt ceiling, it’s not
about default as Mr. Obama and many Democrats want you to think. Talking about
default is a fear tactic, a smoke screen, to draw the national dialog away from
the real issue.
What is the real issue? It is about spending more than the government
receives in revenues, taxes and fees.
Mr. Obama and his Democrat supporters want you to think the issue is about
defaulting on our debt, because everyone knows that default is bad, and even the
idea of it creates anxiety in people. And if they can get you anxious about
default, and the need to raise the debt ceiling so we won’t default, then you
won’t think about curbing spending.
Here’s an example from household budgeting. We all have a list of household
expenses that have to be paid every month, like rent or mortgage, utilities,
food, clothing; and we all have a list of things that we would like to have,
like new cars, big screen TVs, new couches. What we all do is prioritize our
expenses so that we pay the bills we have to pay every month first, and then if
we have any money left over we can buy the things we would like to have. When we
run out of money, we stop buying.
Unfortunately, with the advent of the credit card industry, we can buy more
on credit that we can afford. But this just increases the number of dollars
spent on the bills we must pay every month, thereby taking away from our ability
to buy the things we would like to have. If we do this long enough, we
eventually have no more available money for anything but our must pay bills. And
if we can’t pay those we go into default, are at the mercy of our creditors, and
risk loosing everything we have.
My point in this example is that we can’t keep borrowing more and more.
Eventually our creditors will call in their loans, which will force us to loose
everything we have. If you think this scenario cannot happen, just talk to a few
people whose homes went into foreclosure in the last couple of years. They are
all around us, in every city.
The only way to prevent us from loosing everything is to first stop the
government’s ability to borrow any more. The government is like an addict on
crack, when it comes to spending. If you don’t force them to go cold turkey,
they will never stop.
Once we force the government to stop borrowing, we must also make sure they
pay the debt first so they don’t default. Then they can pay everything else with
the money left over.
But we must also force them to stop taxing, or else they will drive the
taxpayers into the poor house before they stop spending.
Money is like crack to a government.
No need to raise the debt ceiling
Posted June 1, 2011
There is no need to raise the debt ceiling any further. The only benefit
would be allowing congress and the President to continue spending money we do
It is possible to keep the debt ceiling unchanged, still pay down the current
debt without defaulting, and not hurt any of the entitlement spending.
The primary casualty, however, of this radical approach might be the
political careers of the progressive left when they don’t deliver more pork and
benefits to their constituents. And we might even be able to pay down our
current debt in a reasonable timeframe.
Money is like crack to a politician. Let’s help them kick the habit.
Posted June 2, 2011
debt’s deception stands knocking at the door
enticing you with all her beauty bold
images dancing gladly evermore
of all life’s wealth amassed before untold
can appetites ever be satisfied
when life’s financial desires compel
negotiations never ratified
by passions pushing safety to rebel
think not of your final danger’s outcome
when overwhelming debt your life consumes
for every penny pays the total sum
destruction dancing as disaster looms
politicians so love their money gained
taxpayer’s poverty the cost maintained
discussions, part 3 expressions #182. Copyright © 2011 by Ken Gilbert. All rights reserved.
Mitt Romney and global warming
Posted June 4, 2011
Mitt Romney, former Massachusetts governor and 2012 GOP presidential hopeful,
recently stated “I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that
humans have contributed to that.”
I challenge Mr. Romney to offer scientific proof to back up his statement.
But he can’t, because the only scientific proof that was stated a number of
years ago was proved to be doctored by both UK and US scientists. They fudged
the data to fit their theory, rather than proving their theory with their
analytical data. The scientific method gone awry.
Have you noticed that the global warming dialog appears to be divided along
ideological lines. Progressive Democrats seem to be its most vocal proponents,
and conservative Republicans its most vocal opponents. Why do you think that is?
Does either group have a better scientific understanding than the other? I
don’t think so. Even scientists are divided on this subject. So, if everyone is
divide on whether or not global warming is real, why the push by the EPA for
regulations, and why the push by federal and state governments for legislation?
The answer seems to come from the group of usual suspects: money and power.
Money and power are great motivators for regulations and legislation. The
best example is General Electric, who holds the patents on the compact
florescent light, and who stands to make mega billions as the incandescent light
bulbs are forced out of the market by regulations and legislation. Oh, and don’t
forget that these compact florescent lights are a hazardous waste nightmare if
one happens to break in your home.
In addition, the federal and state governments stand to collect a lot of
money in fees and taxes by enacted global warming regulations and legislation.
This way our government bureaucracies can continue to feed their massive growth
at the expense of the taxpayers. And the bigger the government the more power it
wields over our daily lives.
Why does Mr. Romney believe so strongly in global warming, and continue to
ignore all the controversy surrounding it? I suspect if we could dig deeply into
the details behind his financial backers, we would find some very large donors
who stand to gain big bucks from continued global warming regulations and
Why is Mr. Romney out of step with the Republican Party when it comes to
global warming? Here Mr. Romney appears to be a RINO (Republican in name only).
He calls himself a Republican, but he aligns himself with progressives on fiscal
and social issues, like global warming and RomneyCare.
Can anyone who is a true Reagan conservative come out of the progressive
Massachusetts political environment? Certainly Mr. Romney, based on past
performance, will never push to lower government spending, to lower personal and
business taxes, and to reduce the size of government.
A vote for Romney is a vote to continue the progressive agenda.
Posted June 7, 2011
Representative Anthony Weiner finally did it. He finally admitted he was
responsible for lying to the American people, for posting lewd photos of
himself, and for engaging in multiple online relationships over many years
behind his wife’s back. He also admitted he lied about Andrew Breitbart being
responsible for hacking his Twitter account and posting lewd photos.
Does Mr. Weiner’s behavior surprise you? It didn’t surprise me. He follows in
a long line of politicians who think the rules of propriety and decorum don’t
apply to them. They think they can do what ever they want, and when caught lie.
If they say the lie often enough people will believe them.
Politicians say what they want you to believe to be the truth, whether it is
or not. Fortunately most people recognize the lie, even if they won’t speak up
Maybe it’s time to require our politicians to tell us the truth, and throw
them out of office when they don’t. We need to require our politicians to be men
and women of virtue. That is people who are willing to speak and behave
according to a moral rectitude that only comes from a right attitude from a Holy
Virtue is not only saying and doing the right thing because we think it is
right. That leaves too much room for our own interpretation of what is right.
Virtue is saying and doing the right thing because our Holy God tells us it is
right according to His standard.
He has shown you what is good, and what the Lord requires of you, but to do
justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
This behavior, when required of all our politicians, will lead to economic
and social recovery in our once great country. Demand it from your politicians.
Posted June 8, 2011
our economy circles round the drain
getting closer to destruction’s black hole
politicians discussing with disdain
voter’s requests for oversight control
yet stimulus dollars do disappear
into government friendly coffers
ready to bailout all those who revere
past progressive political proffers
over regulation reinforces
our economic slide to recession
leading to never ending discourses
regarding today’s spending obsession
economic disaster unforeseen
when overwhelming haughtiness obscene
discussions, part 3 expressions #183. Copyright © 2011 by Ken Gilbert. All rights reserved.
Sarah Palin’s emails
Posted June 10, 2011
Today is the day that the great state of Alaska is set to release all of
Sarah Palin’s emails from her first two years as governor. This release has
received a lot of attention due to Ms. Palin’s political prominence in the GOP
and the Tea Party.
These emails, over 24,000 pages, have already been reviewed by Ms. Palin’s
team, and none were withheld for personal reasons; although, they were never
written with the expectation that they would be seen by the entire world.
How many of us would like to have two years of our email read by the world?
But then we’re not potentially running for the job of President of the United
States. A job for which there is no privacy, ever, for a Republican.
Then there are our friends at the New York Times who are seeking people from
across the nation to help them read and contextualize all the emails. Many other
media organizations will be looking into these emails as well; and there is also
the Associated Press, who is scanning them all into a database for their writers
to have easy access.
Why do you think the New York Times is so anxious to read and contextualize
these emails? They are a militantly progressive organization which never gets
any context right. All their stories about Democrats are biased to make them
look better than they really are; and all their stories about Republicans are
biased to make them look worse than they really are.
What ever happened to the unbiased, non-partisan press? Oh well, so much for
Why are the New York Times and the mad-dog progressive Democrats so rabid to
dig up dirt on Sarah Palin? They will stop at nothing to smear her, to
misrepresent her ideas, and to attack her patriotism any chance they can.
One would think they are afraid of what she stands for. She is a woman who
stands for the strength of the family, not for tearing the family apart with
divorce and abortion. She is a conservative who stands for smaller government,
lower taxes, lower spending, eliminating debt, protecting our borders, fighting
terrorists before they attack our country, and much more.
All of this is an anathema to the New York Times and the mad-dog progressive
Maybe our country would be a little better off if the New York Times and the
other lame-stream media did the same digging into Mr. Obama’s past, like where
he was born, where he really went to college, how he voted as a Senator, just to
name a few.
Ms. Palin may not be my first choice for President at this moment, and I
don’t mind the New York Times and other media digging into her past the way they
are. But what I do mind is their self-righteous bias that prevents them from
using the same magnifying glass on Democrat candidates and office holders.
Integrity is something we have all the time, not just when it gets us what we
think we want. Otherwise it’s self-serving deceitfulness.
Politics as usual?
Posted June 12, 2011
Federalist #1, click link for the full text, Alexander Hamilton, writing under the name Publius, made
this statement about political parties: “To judge from the conduct of the
opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to
evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their
converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their
Mr. Hamilton’s words are as true now as they were when he penned them in
1787. Politics is not, and never has been, about finding the best solution for
the good of the country. It is about one party forcing their will on the whole
group. Politics is about winning the debate for whatever side you are on, and by
whatever means necessary.
A politician, like a lawyer in court, will use every tool at his disposal. If
the rightness of the cause, like securing our cities by securing our borders,
isn’t capable of winning the argument because there are too many people opposed
to the issue, for whatever reason, then our illustrious politicians will resort
to some other method to win. If logic and oratory excellence doesn’t work, then
there is the old tried and true method of calumny, the personal destruction of
your opponent’s character.
Politics is not about doing what’s best for the country, or the state, or the
city; it’s about doing what’s best for the party, and ultimately about doing
what’s best for the politician.
I would love to see the political discourse in this country be about doing
what’s right for the country, the people, and their liberty. But given human
nature, it’s never going to happen this way.
So why am I bringing this up today? Because I believe, as we enter into the
2012 political season, we all need to think about how the process of politics
really works, and how the game is won. I would love to tell you to love your
political enemy, to turn the other cheek to the political slap in the face, and
to not stoop to the lowest common denominator of our political opponents; but
that is unrealistic.
Conservatives cannot win back federal and state governments through
biblically taught methods. Therefore, if you believe, as I do, that we are in a
fight for our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, then we must learn to
fight the fight to win the game. Coming in second is loosing.
Let’s all get off the couch, support our local conservative organizations,
and win the government back for true conservative values.
It’s for the people!
Posted June 13, 2011
Federalist #1, click link for the full text, Alexander Hamilton
made this statement about political motives, “a dangerous ambition more often
lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people.” Note that
I have taken this statement out of the middle of a lengthy sentence; however,
its meaning is the same within the context written.
Mr. Hamilton had a keen understanding of political motives behind the zealous
and sincere rhetoric of his time. He was telling his readers to beware of people
who passionately make their case for doing something by appealing to the
populace with arguments of protecting and upholding the rights of the people. He
says these arguments are masking the speakers real motives, their own ambitions
and self interests.
We hear this argument today in many different variations. ObamaCare
proponents were zealously arguing for its passage as health care reform for the
people who cannot afford it on their own. When in fact, we see the Obama
administration giving waivers to thousands of unions and companies who supported
the politicians with financial benefits for their campaign coffers. This
“dangerous ambition” lurking in the shadows of ObamaCare is exactly what Mr.
Hamilton was talking about.
Then of course there are the unspoken consequences of this type of
legislation, which actually raised the cost of doing business, rather than
cutting the costs of health care. By 2014, when the law goes into full effect,
employers are saying they will have to cancel their employee’s health insurance
programs because they cannot afford to continue them with the additional
expenses imposed by the law.
ObamaCare was done for the people! Seriously?
What about education? We are always told that schools need more and more
money for the children, which is a simple variant of “for the people”. Why is
it that no matter how much money is given to educating our children, there is never
enough to do it right? Many children who graduate high school, if they even
graduate, know how to put a condom on a banana, but cannot articulate three
clear sentences in a row.
Where does all the money for the children go?
Then there is my favorite ruse of all time. The government tells us they need
to tax us more, charge more fees, do away with cheap energy for green energy,
and on and on, all for the environment, which is another variant on “for the
people”. If you haven’t figured it out yet, environmentalism and global warming
is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. It’s all about the
money that gets funneled into the coffers of the environmental organizations and
the green research and manufacturing companies, and into the coffers of the
politicians who are paid to mislead the populace. That’s you and me!
Any time you hear a politician say “it’s for the people” I hope you realize
it’s not about the people; it’s about the money, and the power that derives from
Don’t let our politicians continue their rapacious hoaxes in the name of the
people. Stand up and fight back.
Posted June 14, 2011
On June 14, 1777 the Continental Congress passed the Flag Act, making the
stars and stripes the official flag of the new United States. It stands to this
day as a symbol of the union of the states in the formation of a new nation; and
it stands for the freedom and liberty we all enjoy, and even take for granted,
as we rest in the shadow of the republic for which it stands.
Ragged Old Flag, by Johnny Cash
I walked through a county courthouse square,
On a park bench an old man was sitting there.
I said, “Your old courthouse is kinda run down.”
He said, “Naw, it’ll do for our little town.”
I said, “Your flagpole has leaned a little bit,
And that’s a Ragged Old Flag you got hanging on it.”
He said, “Have a seat”, and I sat down.
“Is this the first time you’ve been to our little town?”
I said, “I think it is.” He said, “I don’t like to brag,
But we’re kinda proud of that Ragged Old Flag.”
“You see, we got a little hole in that flag there
When Washington took it across the Delaware.
And it got powder-burned the night Francis Scott Key
Sat watching it writing ‘Oh Say Can You See’.
And it got a bad rip in New Orleans
With Packingham and Jackson tuggin’ at its seams.”
“And it almost fell at the Alamo
Beside the Texas flag, but she waved on through.
She got cut with a sword at Chancellorsville
And she got cut again at Shiloh Hill.
There was Robert E. Lee, Beauregard, and Bragg,
And the south wind blew hard on that Ragged Old Flag.”
“On Flanders Field in World War I
She got a big hole from a Bertha gun.
She turned blood red in World War II
She hung limp and low by the time it was through.
She was in Korea and Vietnam.
She went where she was sent by her Uncle Sam.”
“She waved from our ships upon the briny foam,
And now they’ve about quit waving her back here at home.
In her own good land she’s been abused --
She’s been burned, dishonored, denied and refused.”
“And the government for which she stands
Is scandalized throughout the land.
And she’s getting threadbare and wearing thin,
But she’s in good shape for the shape she’s in.
’Cause she’s been through the fire before
And I believe she can take a whole lot more.”
“So we raise her up every morning,
Take her down every night.
We don’t let her touch the ground
And we fold her up right.
On second thought I DO like to brag,
’Cause I’m mighty proud of that Ragged Old Flag.”
Knowing future performance
Posted June 15, 2011
On Monday evening the current Republican candidates for the 2012 Presidential
election nominating process participated in a televised debate. I must confess,
I didn’t watch it. I find staged events like this one to be insulting to the
intelligence of the American voters. After all, how can we assess the
candidate’s positions on important topics from 3-minute sound bytes spoken into
a TV camera for political posturing?
Televised town hall meetings might work, if the candidates weren’t permitted
to seed the audience with their own supporters, and if they weren’t permitted to
pre-approve all the questions.
Are you catching my drift? I know I tend to be a bit cynical about what
politicians say, but I like to think of it as discernment. I want to know that a
politician truly believes what they are saying about a specific topic, say
socialized health care, and not just saying what they think the audience wants
to hear at the time.
For example, when Obama was campaigning he said he wouldn’t raise taxes
except for those making $250,000 and above. Then the first big program he pushes
through is ObamaCare, which requires everyone to purchase health care whether
they can afford it or not. I tend to think I was lied to just so he could get
Herein lies the rub. How can we ensure, to the best of our ability, that a
candidate will not say one thing to get elected, and then do something else when
he gets in office?
I look for consistency. So when Romney supported health care for
Massachusetts, and says that type of plan may not be right for the whole
country, that is ObamaCare, then I have to ask why the inconsistency. Can
something that is good for Massachusetts residents not be good for California,
or Idaho, or Texas?
What I want to hear from our Republican candidates is their position on very
specific issues, and then an explanation of how they upheld that position in
their past political life.
Past consistency is a good predictor of future performance. Convince me with
your track record.
Liberty and prosperity
Posted June 16, 2011
Federalist #2, click link for the full text, John Jay makes his case for the
continuation of the Union
created by the Congress of 1774, but under the new Constitution recommended by
the Convention. His argument is based on the notion that if they trusted the
people who recommended the Articles of Confederation, then they should trust
even more the people who recommend the new Constitution because they were “tried
and justly approved for patriotism and abilities, and who have grown old in
acquiring political information, were also members of this convention, and
carried into it their accumulated knowledge and experience.”
He says of the people who participated in the Congress of 1774 “That they
were individually interested in the public liberty and prosperity, and therefore
that it was not less their inclination than their duty to recommend only such
measures as, after the most mature deliberation, they really thought prudent and
Don’t you wish we could say something similar about today’s politicians?
Wouldn’t it be nice if they were individually interested in the public liberty
and prosperity, and they only recommended such measures as they really thought
prudent and advisable?
We need to look for people who are truly interested in the public liberty and
prosperity and then elevate them to the most influential public office possible.
These are the type of people we need to reverse the encroaching progressivism
strangling our liberty and prosperity. Do any of the current Republican
candidates for President fit this bill? If they do, I haven’t seen it yet!
What is in the public interest of our liberty and prosperity? A number of key
issues come to the fore. First there is the out of control government spending
that is so addicting to our politicians, Democrat and Republican alike. They
seem to think they are not doing their job if they are not spending our money.
When one of my daughters was in college we gave he a credit card for
emergencies. Her idea of an emergency was any time she didn’t have enough money
to buy what she wanted. We tried taking it away a few times to stress the need
for prudence, but always gave it back. Eventually we had to cut it up. If we
don’t do the same to our politicians, they will never stop spending. Money is
like crack to a politician.
Second there is the imprudent taxes and fees and regulations that always cost
us more money. Progressive politicians, whether left or right, have no
restraints when it comes to sticking their hands in the people’s pockets. On the
regulation side, the Obama administration has gotten around the tax legislation
requirement by having his departments, like EPA, impose regulations that force
businesses to spend more money than they can afford or want. And you wonder why
unemployment is currently so high!
I can come up with many more issues that our politicians are not doing in the
interest of public liberty and prosperity. Maybe what we need is a second bill
of rights! This new bill of rights should have articles like the following:
- All spending during every fiscal year needs to be voted on by the House
of Representatives and approved by a two-thirds majority in order to get the
check written. Spending should include taxes, fees, and any costs imposed by
any department’s regulations on individuals and businesses. No approved
spending from any prior fiscal year should happen without a new vote in the
year the money is spent.
- A balanced budget is required every fiscal year, and all actual spending
is limited to the total number of dollars collected the prior fiscal year.
- 3The total debt must be reduced to zero within ten years, with the
exception of Social Security and Medicare.
- All money collected for Social Security and Medicare must be used only
for that purpose, and no other.
- All current debt interest and some principle must be paid before any
other spending can be approved.
- Any necessary emergency borrowing, as in times of war, may be enacted
for the current fiscal year only with a four-fifths majority of the House of
Maybe one of our illustrious Republican presidential candidates will pick up
the ball and run with this idea. I’m sure each of you reading this post has
ideas of your own. Make your views know to the candidates.
It’s time to take our country back. Stand up for what you believe in and
Honor, integrity, and the rule of law
Posted June 20, 2011
Federalist #3, click link for the full text,
John Jay continues his argument for the continuation of the
Union “as it respects security for the preservation of peace and tranquility, as
well as against dangers from foreign arms and influence, as from dangers of the
like kind arising from domestic causes.” He presses the point that one Union is
better, wiser, more efficient, and stronger that thirteen separate nations or
three or four confederacies when it comes to security and safety.
Mr. Jay makes a solid argument for his cause saying “Because when once an
efficient national government is established, the best men in the country will
not only consent to serve, but also will generally be appointed to manage it.”
The best and the brightest chosen from all thirteen states forms a better
decision making body than splitting them up among thirteen separate nations or
three or four confederacies.
After pondering Mr. Jay’s arguments, while I agree with his conclusion of the
need for one Union to foster the desired peace and tranquility, I realized that
his perspective is from a 1787 vantage point of political behavior with honor
and integrity and a healthy reverence for the rule of law, devoid of the
political parties that were just starting to emerge in the new Republican
Note that I use the term “Republican” for the government, and not
“Democratic.” A republican form of government, historically, is one in which
decisions and laws are made by a group of people who are elected by the people
or appointed by those elected, and not by the people directly. The United States
of America was established as a Federal Republic, not a Democracy.
That’s why, originally, only the House of Representatives was elected by the
people in each state, but the Senate was appointed by the state legislatures
(changed by the 17th Amendment), and the President was elected by an electoral
college of state determined individuals. The people had no direct say in
electing the Senators and the President, but they did, and still do, in their
Our founding fathers chose to create a republican form of government, and not
a democracy, because they believed that the people would make self-serving
decisions that would not be good for the Union as a whole, and that those
elected to make the decisions would be men of honor, integrity, and a healthy
reverence for the rule of law.
How far we have strayed! Today’s politicians generally have neither honor,
nor integrity, nor a respect for the rule of law. They seem to want only what’s
good for themselves, their career as a politician, and their possible lucrative
job after public office.
This is cynical, I know. But let’s look at a current example.
The word on the street at the end of last week was that Republicans in the
House were backing away from blocking the debt limit hike. Were they just trying
to assess the public’s reaction through a small leak to the online press? Or
maybe it’s just politics as usual, making a deal because they don’t feel
comfortable being in the middle of a political battle. The pressure is too much
for them, with the Democrats on one side and their constituents on the other. Or
maybe they just want to maintain their standing in the D.C. political community
by proving that they are men and women well versed in the art of compromise.
If they cave they will not be doing what’s best for the long term well being
of the country; and that’s why they were elected in 2010. If they do what’s
expedient for themselves at the expense of the country’s financial safety and
security then they will be breaking faith with the electorate. This then will be
our proof that they are no longer men and women of honor to carry out what they
said they would do, of integrity to fulfill their mission in the face of
mounting adversity, or respectful to the people’s voice in the rule of law.
It is important that we encourage our Representatives to hold the line on the
debt ceiling. Tell them not to raise it under any circumstances. Let them know
how you feel about the financial safety and security of our country.
I’ll leave you with this quote by Alexander Hamilton: “The institution of
delegated power implies that there is a portion of virtue and honor among
mankind which may be a reasonable foundation of confidence.”
Posted June 22, 2011
Is Mitch McConnell, Senator from Kentucky and Minority Leader of the Senate,
paying attention to the consequences of his political actions? Looking at his
recent activities on presidential appointments, he appears to be asleep at the
Mr. McConnell is one of seven Republican co-sponsors of the Presidential
Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act (S.679), which would eliminate the
confirmation requirement for many presidential appointees. This act would be in
direct violation of Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2 of the United States
Do you think it wise and prudent for the Senate to give up even some of its
responsibility, as defined in the Constitution? Why would they even consider
The upside for them might be saving time over some of the minor appointments,
time spent researching backgrounds of the appointees, time spent lobbying for
their approval or disapproval, and time spent voting for or against the
appointees. Of course, their staff does all of the researching, and most of the
lobbying. What else do the Senators have to do, except what the Constitution
gives them the authority and responsibility to do? To advise and consent.
The downside is significantly detrimental to the health and well-being of our
country. Ambassadors and ministers represent the country’s collective interests
around the world. Shouldn’t our illustrious Senators spend some of their
precious time advising and consenting on these individuals to make sure they
approve or disapprove how they will represent us?
Federal judges have the power to direct the outcome of verdicts in cases
brought before them, and some activist judges even try to redefine the law from
the bench. Shouldn’t our illustrious Senators spend some of their precious time
advising and consenting on these individuals to make sure they approve or
disapprove how they will interpret the law, or maybe even if they will try to
Then there are all the major and minor Executive Office appointees for the
various departments reporting to the President. These department office holders
have, of late, a great deal of power to establish and enforce regulations
without any Congressional oversight. Many, like the EPA and NLRB, are directly
or indirectly costing businesses around the country much needed capital in these
tough economic times; and money translates into private sector jobs, which have
declined by 1.9 million since the first stimulus was passed to fix our sagging
Shouldn’t our illustrious Senators spend some of their precious time advising
and consenting on these individuals to make sure they approve or disapprove how
they will potentially behave in their office? Better to disapprove a progressive
tax and spend redistribution of wealth radical before they take office, than to
try to undo the damage they cause later. Oh wait, Congress has also given up
their responsibility to undo any of the damage done to our country’s social and
economic fabric by the out of control Executive branch. They just spend their
time doing whatever it is they do, while the country is burning down around
Wake up and smell the smoke. Maybe it’s time for “we the people” to stimulate
our illustrious Senators into doing their Constitutionally given jobs. That’s
what we are paying them for!
Tell them what you think.
Posted June 25, 2011
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released their long-term
budget outlook last week, and it paints a disastrous picture. They point out
that our nation’s debt will exceed the GDP, the total gross earnings of the US
economy, within the next ten years. The reason for this dire outlook is clear.
Our elected federal legislators will not stop their out of control spending,
taxes, and regulations strangling our economy.
Ben Bernanke recently chided that if we don’t raise the debt limit by 2
trillion dollars our economy will suffer disastrous consequences. The Democrats
want to increase spending as a way to divert this disaster. They also want to
continue with their out of control regulations that are strangling the ability
for businesses to lower costs and create new private sector jobs. And the
Republicans, in my mind, are the worst of the lot. They want to allow the debt
ceiling to be raised if Congress can cut an equal amount in spending.
The six-month continuing resolution passed in April promised a spending
reduction of 38.5 billion dollars. A mere drop in the bucket! Of course, this
was a bogus number using very fuzzy logic that the CBO later said amounted to
pretty much nothing.
When will this craziness stop! When will “we the people” wake up and realize
that we are being lied to again and again and again? Politicians give us some
warm and fuzzy numbers to hold on to so that we will think they are doing what
we want, but the reality is that they are lying to us and doing what they want.
Well, how can we fix the problem of out of control spending, taxation, and
regulation? When will “we the people” say enough is enough?
The CBO also said in their report that we can reduce the debt to zero in 25
years if we cut total spending starting in fiscal year 2012 by only 4.9%, and
then hold spending flat for the duration. I say cut spending by 10%, except in
Medicare and Social Security and Defense, and speed up the process.
The only solution, the way I see it, short of another revolution, is to
replace every politician in next year’s primaries with people who will pledge to
hold the line on the debt limit, cut spending, cut taxes, cut regulations, and
cut the size of government.
Just say NO to politicians who will not take this pledge! Stand up and make
yourself heard in the public forum.
Geithner, progressive pawn
Posted June 27, 2011
Timothy Geithner, the 75th Treasury Secretary of the United States, is no
Alexander Hamilton! Geithner is a political pawn of the progressive tax and
spend big government elite; and although Hamilton, our first Treasury Secretary,
was accused of being a pawn of the Federalists, he created the best and longest
lasting federal monetary and financial system in the world.
Hamilton consolidated a staggering federal and state debt of 77 million
dollars, primarily as a result of the Revolutionary War, and set up a system to
pay down the entire debt in thirty-five years. In addition, Congress and
President Washington held strong beliefs that the government should not spend
any more that it could raise from taxes and unsettled land sales. They all
believed that taxing individuals and businesses was unconscionable.
On the other hand, Geithner believes in building an even bigger government
than we currently have, no matter what the cost to the peace and tranquility of
the people. His latest statement that taxes must be raised on small businesses
so the federal government can remain big is proof of his position. He believes
that this is the only alternative that will provide a balanced approach to
reduce our fiscal deficit.
It is difficult for me to even begin to fathom how someone can think this
way. To put this additional burden on small businesses at a time when local,
state, and federal governments are all looking to solve their financial crises
on the backs of the heart and soul of our economy is not an acceptable solution.
It will only make our financial problems worse. We should be looking for ways to
reduce the operating costs of small businesses, since they are responsible for a
conservative 64% of all new jobs created in the country.
From its inception, our country has done everything possible to foster the
success of small businesses. So why are they being assaulted now?
Part of the problem is we have a tax system that allows 45% of the people to
pay no taxes, or even get back money they didn’t pay in; while big businesses
and unions pay very little to nothing of what they earn in taxes. The other part
of the problem is we have federal, state, and local governments that cannot stop
their spending addictions. Money is like crack to politicians.
We need to find ways to prevent our politicians from spending money they
don’t have, and isn’t theirs. It’s our money, taken away from our families and
It’s time to force politicians to pledge to hold the line on the debt limit,
to cut spending, to cut taxes, to cut regulations, and to cut the size of
government. It’s the only way all the people in our country will be able to
prosper, not just the political elite and their union hacks.
Stand up and speak out for what you believe in.
Criteria for success
Posted June 28, 2011
Federalist #4, click link for the full text,
John Jay continues his reasons why the safety of the people
is best secured by the Union proposed in the Constitution. He addresses the
causes of war and how one Union would be better secured to prevent war on the
one hand, and to prosecute a successful war, if necessary, on the other hand.
Jay talks about our land and resources as tempting targets for other nation’s
ambitions, and our ability to manufacture goods inexpensively as targets for
their wrath. This makes me thing about how our country was built upon our great
manufacturing prowess for almost two hundred years; and then our not so great
politicians started allowing, or even forcing, our manufacturing offshore. Shame
on us for allowing them to emasculate our nation in this way!
Jay’s conclusion, one that drove us in the second half of the twentieth
century, is much broader than just manufacturing: “If they see that our national
government is efficient and well administered, our trade prudently regulated,
our militia properly organized and disciplined, our resources and finances
discreetly managed, our credit re-established, our people free, contented, and
united, they will be much more disposed to cultivate our friendship than provoke
Our federal politicians have lost sight of these six criteria, as established
by Jay, to ensure that other nations are more likely to want of be our ally
rather than our enemy. I’ll briefly look at each one to see how we stack up to
these criteria today.
Is our national government efficient and well administered? The answer is NO.
Our government has gotten bloated, inefficient, and out of control. We have
agencies dictating rules and regulations without any legislative oversight. The
EPA with its environmental and energy conservation regulations are strangling
businesses; the NLRB with its union associations is telling businesses what they
can and cannot do; ICE is determining which illegal aliens can stay in the
country and which must leave, against federal law; and then, of course, there
are all the useless and unneeded programs that our government wastes our money
on. These are just a few examples of the many that might be listed.
Is our trade prudently regulated? The answer is NO. The recently reported
trade deficit for April decreased by 6.7% to a whopping 43.7 billion dollars, or
an annualized number of over 500 billion dollars; which means we sell much less
to other countries than we buy from them. This also means we are loosing over
500 billion dollars in manufacturing and agricultural revenue to other nations.
Since people expenses are a large portion of any manufacturing and agricultural
job, then we are loosing about 100 to 200 billion dollars in private sector jobs
to other nations every year. We would definitely be able to lower, if not
virtually eliminate, our current 9.1% unemployment significantly if we just cut
our trade deficit in half.
Is our militia properly organized and disciplined? The answer is YES, with
some caveats. We have the best organized and disciplined military in the world;
and we proved it over and over again since the Revolutionary War. The caveats
are threefold. Our politicians seem to think our military, and therefore our
security, is a political pawn of inappropriate spending policies; our
politicians don’t think they need to provide our soldiers with all the necessary
equipment to get the job done and with the least loss of life; and our
politicians seem to think our soldiers can win battles without the proper
intelligence sources about the enemy’s strength, location, and movement.
Are our resources and finances discreetly managed? The answer is NO. You
might think our resources are managed just fine; but I’ll give you an example of
our forests. For environmental reasons, so they say, our forests are no longer
maintained by eliminating the dead leaves, needles, and wood on the forest
floor, allowing fires to start and spread rapidly, as we’ve seen in recent years
with all the out of control wild fires that have been reported. Certainly, no
one can say that our finances are well managed; not when we’re 14.3 trillion
dollars in debt, and our politicians want to raise that another 2 trillion
dollars to continue their out of control spending. They don’t seem to think it’s
a problem that our debt is currently 70% of GDP; they want to push it to 100% in
the next ten years.
Is our credit re-established? The answer is a definite NO. Our accumulation
of debt, with no plan to pay it back, let alone to lower it, is causing our
credit rating to be lowered, that is worsened. Recently both Moody and S&P
warned that we need to reverse the expansion of our debt if we hope to keep our
triple-A rating. If our credit rating drops then the cost of capital will go up,
and we will have to spend more on the interest for our debt, taking money away
from other more important uses.
Are our people free, contented, and united? The answer is NO. Freedom and
contentment in society is derived from a government that is strong enough to
ensure our security and prosperity, as it relates to the rest of the world, and
from a government that is small enough not to hinder our freedoms with
regulations and not to sabotage our contentment with oppressive taxes. Unity, on
the other hand, has been elusive in every generation since the Revolutionary
War. People always disagree on how to solve the problems facing our nation; they
even disagree on identifying which problems to solve; whether it was on
independence, slavery, and the type of government back then, or on the debt, the
size of government, and illegal aliens today. To remain united, however, we must
find common ground where both sides can feel like they have given up a little to
win a little; not the rapaciousness and calumny of today’s politics.
So let’s see, of the six criteria identified by Jay, we are not doing well on
five, which means that other nations see us as an abject failure, and therefore
are looking to tear us down rather than befriend us. Is this how we see
How do you see our performance according to Jay’s criteria? Speak out and
make your views known.
Obama, Hypocrite in Chief
Posted June 30, 2011
Now that it fits Mr. Obama’s agenda, he is pushing the House and Senate
leaders to come up with a plan to reduce the nation’s long-term deficit, raise
the debt ceiling, and raise more revenue. By the way, “revenue” is the current
politically correct Democrat code word for “taxes“.
In addition, Obama is chastising Congress for wanting to take their break for
the 4th of July, and for ignoring the debt crisis. What a hypocrite! Obama
ignored the debt crisis by having Biden lead the talks with Congress; and Obama
has continually taken expensive vacations with his family, and many others to
service their needs, while Congress has been in session doing whatever it is
they can do to bring down our country. It would be a God-send if Congress took
lots of vacations too, because the more they are vacationing the less they are
destroying what little freedom and liberty we have left.
Obama is now saying we should eliminate the private jet tax breaks that his
stimulus bill created just two years ago. I wonder what happened to the 8%
unemployment that his stimulus bill promised? We’re at 9.1% unemployment in the
recently released numbers. So that didn’t work very well. Did it?
Obama has no plan. He doesn’t even know what to do to help fix the problems.
All his work experience, other than as a politician, was as a community
activist, a rabble rouser, to get people to do what his handlers, the ones who
make the puppet dance, tell him to do. All he knows is the blame game. Divert
attention from himself, and from the fact that he is totally incompetent at his
job, to others, to the GOP, to oil companies, to people making 250 thousand
dollars or more, to those getting tax breaks for their private jets, and on and
on and on.
Now to my point. What’s the problem with his pushing the House and Senate
leaders to come up with a plan to reduce the nation’s long-term deficit, raise
the debt ceiling, and raise more revenue?
How will raising the debt ceiling help reduce the nation’s long-term debt?
Raising the debt ceiling means we will be borrowing more money, not paying back
what we already owe, which will increase our long-term debt, not decrease it.
What we need to do to get this country and our economy back on track to
prosperity is to hold the line on debt. No new debt under any circumstances.
Second, we must curtail our voracious spending addiction, making sure we pay the
interest on the debt first, before any other money is doled out. Third, we must
make sure Congress does not raise any more revenue, that is no more taxes, so as
not to stifle business growth any more than it already is. Fourth, we must
prioritize our spending so that we are not neglecting important areas like
defense, and Social Security and Medicare for those over fifty.
If you haven’t realized yet, the biggest impediment to our economic growth
and prosperity is ObamaCare. Businesses have slowed down hiring, or stopped
altogether, because of the government imposed increased cost burden that comes
with the healthcare requirements. Repealing ObamaCare would be a giant step on
the road to economic recovery and prosperity.
Obama and the Congressional leadership, Democrat and Republican alike, are
betting their jobs on the fact that we don’t pay attention to what they say from
one day to the next. They think we are either too busy to pay attention, too
stupid to connect the dots, or just don’t care enough to call them on their
Let’s show Obama and Congress how it feels to be unemployed by voting them
out of office. I only wish we could take away their lifetime pensions and
benefits, like the best healthcare in the world, too.
The time has come for us to pay attention, and to take back our country
before it goes down the drain for good. Stand up, get involved, and speak out.
Religion and the Left
Posted July 2, 2011
What is it about the liberal elite that they hate anyone who is a professed
Christian, and have an overwhelming need to denigrate them in the main stream
media and the liberal blogs? What’s wrong with being a religious, God fearing,
morally focuses individual in today’s society?
Yes, religion does have a place in our public persona, just like secular
humanism, Darwinism, environmentalism, and global warming. Each goes into making
us who we are, a living, breathing, feeling, thinking human being; and each
requires faith to be a follower of their tenants. Faith is the substance of
things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
Being a Christian in our public, as well as private, life is not a bad thing.
In fact, having a strong moral foundation and then living every day trying to
adhere to that standard is a good thing. It means we are less likely to funnel
our campaign funds into private accounts, or to ensure that public stimulus
money only goes to political supporters, or to lie about where we were born just
to become President.
Don’t get me wrong. Religious people stumble and do the same immoral stuff.
But, like David when he slept with Bathsheba, a married woman, had her husband
killed, and then covered it up, he admitted that he was wrong and asked for
God’s forgiveness when he was confronted with the truth. That’s why God said “he
is a man after My own heart.” Not because he made a mistake, but because he
admitted that he was wrong and asked for forgiveness. David sought after God’s
heart, to be like Him. He was man enough to stand up for what he did and to live
with the consequences.
I strongly believe that the social fabric of our country, and our economy,
would be a whole lot better off if everyone in public office had the moral foundation
and conscience to do what’s right for the country, rather than what’s right for
So when someone is an admitted follower of Jesus Christ in a public forum, I
respect them for their honesty, and know that they will try to do the right
moral thing in every situation in life, public and private. And I know they will
stumble, apologize, pick themselves up, and continue trying to do the right
thing. Trying is the operative word; it’s something to strive for.
I know Christians get a bad rep as being “holier than thou.” That too goes
against Christ’s teachings. We need to be known as “humbler than thou.” That’s
how Jesus walked; and that’s how we need to walk.
In my Christian life, since becoming a follower in Christ, the last thing I
would want said about me is “I had no idea that he is a Christian.”
Contrary to popular belief, a Christian is not weak, leaning on a religious
crutch; they are strong, with the strength of Christ in every action, public or
private. Being a Christian is not something to be ashamed of in public; it is
something to be made known in public. Otherwise, Christ will be ashamed of us,
and not make us known to the Father.
Being a moral person is not a bad thing. The liberal elite ought to try it;
they may find they like themselves better for the trying.
The Fourth of July
Posted July 4, 2011
Today is the Fourth of July. A day set aside to celebrate that momentous day
in 1776 when the thirteen Colonies declared their independence, breaking all
ties with oppressive British rule. It is the day that all thirteen Colonies
unanimously agreed to declare “That these United Colonies are, and of right
ought to be, free and independent states.”
Their claim was a simple one, building over fifteen years of progressively
increasing abuse of power under British rule, that “We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and
the pursuit of happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are
instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these
ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute
new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its
powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety
The British instituted a concerted campaign to deprive the peoples in the
Colonies of their unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness by imposing restrictions on their liberties of self government, going
as far as abolishing those territorial governments that objected to their
actions, and by strangling their pursuit of happiness by imposing unreasonably
burdensome taxes at a time when it was already difficult to make a living.
We set aside this day, two hundred thirty-five years later, to honor these
great people who put their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor on the
line for what they believed in, to stand up against an oppressive and
overbearing government. Their blood was shed so that we too can have claim to
our unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
But do we? Our claim to these unalienable rights is slowly being taken away
by a corrupt government that wants to take money away from hard working
individuals in order to give it to the liberal elite and to their union lackeys,
that wants to impose restrictive and unnecessary regulations upon the people in
the name of protecting them from themselves, and that wants to allow the people
from other less fortunate nations to indiscriminately take up residence in this
great country under false and illegal premises.
How much longer will we let our government run unchecked and unfettered by
simple restraint? When will we start to protect of our rights to life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness? Where are all the great men and women of this
generation who will stand up to a corrupt, out of control, oppressive
Remember what the great founders of our country said, “Whenever any form of
government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to
alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation
on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”
Reclaim our country from this liberal lunacy that threatens our very way of
existence. Stand up and speak out.
God Bless America.
How stupid does he think we are?
Posted July 5, 2011
No matter how much the progressive Democrats use their typical fear tactics
on the populace regarding the debt ceiling deadline looming on August 2nd,
according to Geithner, will that really be so bad?
What’s the worst that can happen? We will have to send all non-essential
government employees home on an extended vacation; we will need to prioritize
what bills we pay; and we won’t have any more destructive legislation passed for
a while. Sounds like a holiday breather for the country to me.
Geithner again warned of catastrophic economic and market consequences if the
government defaults on its loans. However, no one is recommending that our
government default on its debt payments; and there is no plausible reason for
the government to do this.
How stupid does he think we are? The debt interest can still be paid even if
we don’t raise the debt ceiling. It just means that we have to prioritize which
bills we pay first, just like we do in our own family when things get difficult.
It does, however, mean extra work for our politicians to determine what needs to
be paid, what can wait, and what can be renegotiated.
The biggest issue, of course, is that the debt has gotten so out of control
that it takes up a whopping 44% of the annual federal budget. Obama’s 2012
fiscal year budget proposal is 3.7 trillion dollars, which means that the debt
payments alone would exceed 1.6 trillion dollars. Entitlement spending accounts
for an additional 2 trillion dollars; then there’s the unexpected expenses,
which is never budgeted for by our government. With an estimated revenue intake,
that’s taxes and fees, of 5 trillion dollars, that leaves us with a short fall
of about 700 billion dollars.
My novice math says that there won’t really be a need to cut very much from
the budget to get everything into balance, less than 19%. That’s the first step.
Then we can start cutting taxes and spending simultaneously so we can get this
tax and spend madness under control.
I’m sure critics will say my analysis is overly simplistic and naive, and
will try to obfuscate the discussion in language that will hide the real issues.
But given my business background of many years, this is the kind of first level
approximation that indicates whether or not we needed to dig deeper.
Guess what? We need to dig deeper! Don’t just allow the politicians to vote
in a higher debt ceiling. Make them work for their exorbitant paycheck!
But don’t believe my numbers either. The internet is a wealth of information
from reliable sources, if you want to investigate on your own.
Dig out the truth for yourself, then stand up, speak out, and contact your
Congressmen and Senators.
Redefine the Constitution?
Posted July 6, 2011
Now Geithner wants to redefine the Constitution to say that he has the power,
through the Executive branch, to decide whether or not to raise the debt limit.
At least that was what he implied when he quoted Amendment 14 Section 4.
Amendment 14 Section 4 states “The validity of the public debt of the United
States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and
bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be
He can argue that the debt shouldn’t be questioned until he turns blue in the
face. However, Amendment 14 does not supersede Article 1 Section 8 of the
Constitution, which defines the powers of Congress, not of the Executive, saying
“The Congress shall have Power … To borrow money on the credit of the United
Once again I have to ask, “How stupid does he think we are?” Even though
Amendment 14 says that the debt shouldn’t be questioned that is must be paid
according to the Supreme Court in 1935, it doesn’t say that the Executive has
the power to borrow money, only Congress has this power according to the
Geithner and the progressive tax and spend Democrats are trying to redefine
the Constitution in order to justify what they want to do. Their attitude is
“don’t confuse me with the facts, I just want to define them to be what I want
it to be!”
The real fact of the matter is that only Congress is legally capable of
borrowing any money, Article 1 Section 8, and then the United States government
is required to repay its creditors, Amendment 14 Section 4.
So if Geithner and Obama try to borrow additional money to fund their out of
control spending without first getting approval from Congress, then they will be
acting in violation of the Constitution of the United States of America.
But who’s going to stop them? Congress doesn’t have the backbone to stand up
to the Executive as they have just shown by not challenging the President’s war
powers over Libya; and the Supreme Court doesn’t have the fortitude to stand up
to the Executive as they have just shown by choosing not to hear the case before
them against the President’s eligibility.
Our President, Congress, and Supreme Court have all exhibited their total
disregard for our Constitution in their recent actions. What’s next? Abolishing
free speech? Oh, wait, people are already being fired for what they say.
Abolishing freedom of the press? Oh, wait, the mainstream press is not free;
since they will only publish the leftist propaganda. Abolish our right against
unlawful search and seizure? Oh, wait, the TSA already has done this in spades.
Abolish our right to bear arms? Their trying, but they haven’t been able to
accomplish this one yet.
I think you get my point. We need to stop this leftist lunacy that thinks
it’s ok to erode the freedom and liberty given us in the Constitution. But if no
one stands up and says “No more!” they will keep doing what they are doing.
Stand up, speak out, and contact your Congressmen and Senators.
Hope and change
Posted July 8, 2011
Federalist #5, click link for the full text,
John Jay makes his strongest argument yet for Union and the
passage of the Constitution by the States. In it he finalizes his discussion
that one Union would be the best possible answer, verses three or four separate
Confederacies or Nations, to protect all Thirteen States against the dangers
from foreign force and influence.
This time he agues for the need for protection from each other, should three
or four separate Confederacies or Nations emerge. He likens the United States to
England before the addition of Scotland, and to the various European nations,
pointing out how they were forever fighting against each other over whatever it
was that excited their fancy or their ire at the time. I think it his best
argument of the four essays written by him so far.
In it he makes the simple statement “We may profit by their experience
without paying the price which it cost them.”
Learning life’s lessons is not always the easiest for us, since learning is
the longest lasting from our mistakes, rather than from our successes. However,
sometimes we truly can learn from the mistakes of others, so we don’t have to
make the same ones ourselves; and this is Jay’s point.
If only this were true with our current federal government, which seems to
want to follow the socialistic ways of Europe to the brink of destruction even
though many European nations are currently looking to go a different way. All we
have to do is take an honest look at how the European nations have fared over
the past twenty years, and we would immediately put the brakes on.
But our illustrious politicians don’t want to take an honest look at the
difficulties Europe is having. Their arrogance leads then to think they can do
it better just because they think they’re smarter. However, the bottom line will
be the same.
ObamaCare, our socialized medicine, will drive us to the brink of bankruptcy
just like it has them; and our big government tax and spend mentality will drive
us to the brink of financial ruin. Redistributing money from individuals and
private companies to public ones will not work for us any more than it has for
our European allies.
Obama called this hope and change! So, how’s that hope and change working for
you now? Unemployment just went up to 9.2%, and the United States financial
system is on the brink of collapse. More debt, more spending, more taxation, and
more government will not fix the problem.
Our only real hope lies in the realization that our European friends have
really screwed it up royally, and that true change lies in learning from their
mistakes before we follow them into disaster and ruin. Our only real hope and
change lies in holding the line on the debt ceiling, lowering the debt as fast
as we can, reducing spending, reducing taxation, reducing the size of
government, and getting rid or the regulations currently strangling free
enterprise and small businesses around the country.
We need to make our voices heard for true hope and change that will benefit
all the people! Stand up, speak out, and contact your Congressmen and Senators.
The Politics of God
Posted July 11, 2011
How would you answer this question: “Which of the following statements comes
closest to describing your views about the Bible:
the Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for
the Bible is the inspired word of God but not everything in it should be taken
the Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends, history, and moral precepts
recorded by man?”
According to a recent Gallup poll, asked May 5-8, 2011, 49% of American
adults are most likely to answer that the Bible is the inspired word of God, 30%
are most likely to answer that the Bible is the actual word of God, and 17% are
most likely to answer that the Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends,
history, and moral precepts recorded by man.
The following graph shows the trends for this question collected by Gallup since 1977.
The poll results also indicated that 46% of Protestants/Christians and 65% of
Catholics believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God, and 63% of those
who profess no religion believe that the Bible is an ancient book of fables,
legends, history, and moral precepts recorded by man.
In addition, the poll results indicated that 51% Republicans, 50%
Independents, 46% Democrats, 45% Conservatives, 55% Moderates, and 48% Liberals
believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God; and that 6% Republicans, 21%
Independents, 24% Democrats, 7% Conservatives, 20% Moderates, and 31% Liberals
believe that the Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends, history, and moral
precepts recorded by man.
You can draw your own conclusions from these numbers by viewing the entire
set of results on the Gallup website (http://www.gallup.com/poll/148427/Say-Bible-Literally.aspx).
I find it interesting that almost 1 in 4 Democrats and more than 3 in 10
Liberals believe that the Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends, history,
and moral precepts recorded by man. These are the highest of all the political
groups identified by Gallup.
Do these findings have any relationship or correlation with each group’s
political platforms? I don’t think we can say, since this poll did not dig
deeper into how ones view of the Bible affects or influences their political
But, what we see in the real world is that Democrats and Liberals are the
ones pushing the agenda to have government take over all the things that the
Bible says God’s people should be doing: feed the hungry, give drink to the
thirsty, take in the stranger, clothe the naked, visit the sick, and visit those
Morality cannot be legislated; however, try telling this to a Democrat or
Liberal. However, the church should not be abdicating its responsibilities to the
79% of all American adults believe that the Bible is the word of God; and
therefore we should be living it out in our everyday life. All bible believing
people need to take back our God given responsibility to go out of our way to
help others. There is no other way, since faith without works is dead.
Get involved in the work of God in your local community. God’s people can
make a difference in the world today!
When Obama speaks
Posted July 12, 2011
When Obama speaks does anyone really listen to what he says? Sure,
all his czars and his staff listen to him; after all he hired them. But
that’s what, maybe a couple of hundred people? Maybe the Democrat
leaders in Congress still listen to him; although Reid and Pelosi have
been unusually silent during the ongoing debt limit talks.
Do you listen to what Obama really says? I don’t! I never understand
his point. But then I don’t think he even understands what he’s saying.
So when Obama says he cannot guarantee that Social Security, veteran,
and disability checks will go out starting August 3rd if Democrats and
Republicans fail to reach an agreement on raising the debt limit, and
blames it on there not being enough money in the coffers to cover the
checks, does he really believe what he is saying?
There is no way that the government coffers ever get that low, given
they are taking in tax payments from around the country every quarter.
It’s scare tactic rhetoric! Saul Alinsky would be proud.
Do you think the Democrats in Congress would risk reelection in order
to spitefully make a point if the Republicans blocked the debt limit
increase by August 2nd? There’s no way on God’s green earth that they
would be so stupid, knowing that the electorate is against raising the
We can hold the line on the debt limit, pay the interest on current
loans, send out checks to the elderly, veterans, and disabled, and not
go into default. Sure, some programs will not get any additional dollars
to continue; but those should be selected by our politicians so as to
have minimum impact on the economy.
Just like in our family, when times get financially difficult, we
must stop spending money in the areas that are less important so we have
money to pay the more important bills. We must show some fiscal
responsibility, if we want to get this great country back onto a secure
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that we cannot spend
more than we have without bankrupting the entire country. We can only do
that in times of extreme national emergency; and then only for a short
Please tell your Representatives and Senators to hold the line on the
debt limit. Make a difference by speaking out.
McConnell’s old idea
Posted July 16, 2011
Mitch McConnell, Minority Leader in the Senate, has just proposed an
old idea, one used in the 90’s for expedited review of agency rules, to
allow three expedited debt ceiling increases between now and the end of
the year totaling 2.5 trillion dollars, in return for 2.5 trillion
dollars of spending decreases.
Does this sound like a good idea to you? It doesn’t to me! I believe
that we should not be raising the debt limit under any circumstances.
There should be no smaller increases totaling one very large increase.
The only possible way to reduce the 14.3 trillion dollar debt is to
reduce our real spending.
McConnell is what I like to call one of the old guard Republicans;
one who is more comfortable in the land of compromise, go along to get
along. However, compromise is what has allowed this once great country
to get into the fiscal mess we are in today.
It’s not about compromise! Democrats don’t compromise. Obama doesn’t
want to compromise away his tax an spend ideology, so why should we.
Obama’s idea of compromise is to raise the debt limit now, increase
taxes now, and we’ll cut spending at some later unspecified date. He’s
not even old enough, or lived in the USA as a child, to remember the
phrase “I’ll gladly pay you on Tuesday for a hamburger today.”
What we need is real spending cuts now, along with no new taxes, cuts
in the federal government, and a dismantling of the regulations
strangling our country’s small business. Then we won’t need to raise the
debt limit; in fact we might even begin to pay off the 14.3 trillion
My economic creed is “lower taxes, lower spending, less regulation,
smaller government, and no debt.” Maybe not immediately achievable, but
a great goal to hold up as a way to restructure our federal government
for prosperity and economic freedom in the years to come.
Please tell your Representatives and Senators to hold the line on the
debt limit. Make a difference by speaking out.
Truth, a rare commodity
Posted July 14, 2011
A couple of days ago Obama said he cannot guarantee that Social
Security, veteran, and disability checks will go out starting August 3rd
if Democrats and Republicans fail to reach an agreement on raising the
debt limit, and blames it on there not being enough money in the coffers
to cover the checks.
We know this is not correct, since the federal government is
constantly taking in revenue, in the form of taxes and fees. So if the
debt limit is not raised, they can simply prioritize their payments to
interest on the debt and promised entitlements for retirees, veterans,
and disabled individuals.
Yesterday Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, said that
the central bank is prepared to provide additional stimulus if the
current sluggish economic trend persists. That means buying back more
Treasury bonds, known as “quantitative easing”, by printing more money
to cover the purchase.
What does all this mean for us regular people trying to raise a
family, pay our bills, and keep a reasonable roof over our heads? It
means higher unemployment, run away inflation, and even more
Does anyone know what the real unemployment number is?
The unemployment number published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS) for June 2011 is 9.2% (people unemployed 15 weeks or less), but
the BLS unemployment number is really 14.5% (people unemployed 26 weeks
or less), and the underemployment number showing up on the internet
ranges from 16.2% to as high as 22.7% (the real number of people out of
work or only working part time).
Notice how the monthly government reporting is only based on the
number of people unemployed for 15 weeks or less; and the BLS doesn’t
even report on the number of unemployed over 26 weeks or on those who
are underemployed. This is quite hypocritical, since people can now get
unemployment insurance for almost 2 years, and many people are working
part time jobs just to get by. Why aren’t they reporting the real
To check out the BLS Employment Situation News Release, dated July 8,
2011, go to the BLS website (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.htm)
for the full report. My numbers come from Table A-12.
The current inflation rate as of May 2011 is 3.6%, based on the
consumer price index (CPI) published monthly by the BLS. Some
interesting highlights include food increasing at 3.5% and oil and gas
increasing at a whopping 36%. However, some reputable internet sites put
the real inflation rate as high as 11.2%. I haven’t been able to figure
out how yet, but I know the BLS is using its fuzzy math to keep the
published inflation rate low.
To check out the BLS Consumer Price Index News Release, dated June
15, 2011, go to the BLS website (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.htm)
for the full report. My numbers come from Table A.
So if Bernanke has his way, the central bank will print new money to
buy back additional Treasury bonds so as to artificially keep the US
economic picture looking good on the surface. But the real impact of not
ridding ourselves of the huge debt and of trying to stimulate the
economy with freshly printed greenbacks is uncontrolled inflation.
The result of this uncontrolled inflation will mean that every dollar
we have saved or invested will be worth significantly less, and
everything we own, such as our homes, will be worth less in real
purchasing power. When this happens we will look back at the great
depression fondly, thinking those years were better than we have; and
Obama will be remembered less favorably than Carter.
Truth is a rare, if nonexistent, commodity in Washington, and
especially in the Obama administration. Obama and his cronies will only
tell us what they think we want to hear, not what’s really going on. So
please don’t believe anything anyone tells you or anything you read;
check out the details for yourself.
Please tell your Representatives and Senators to follow the Economic
Make a difference by speaking out.
Posted July 15, 2011
Today in an attempt to push his progressive tax and spend ideology
forward as the only solution to the current debt limit negotiations,
Obama made one of his more outrageous claims to date: that 80 percent of
the American people support the Democrats’ demand for tax increases.
He said “The American people are sold” and that “The problem is
members of Congress are dug in ideologically.”
Obama’s claim couldn’t be farther from the truth, according to a
recent Rasmussen national telephone survey conducted July 12-13, 2011.
The truth is that only 34% favor including any additional taxes in the
debt limit legislation and 55% are opposed.
Maybe Obama didn’t quite understand what he was being told; since it
turns out that 82% of Republicans surveyed do not want any new taxes in
the deal. That’s close to 80%, right? Also, 58% of Democrats surveyed do
want new taxes included in the deal; and independents are split 35% in
favor and 51% are opposed.
You can check out the data on this Rasmussen
In another Rasmussen national telephone survey conducted July 6-7,
2011, 55% of likely voters think decreasing government spending would
help the economy, 24% think decreasing spending hurts the economy, and
11% think it will have no impact.
Looking at it from the other way, 24% of likely voters think tax
increases help the economy, 54% think tax increases hurt the economy,
and 11% think they have no impact whatsoever on the economy.
You can check out the data on this Rasmussen
Have you ever noticed that when the Democrats accuse Republicans of
being “dug in ideologically”, or anything else for that matter, they are
really applying a stereotypical label that fits themselves, and not
their opponents, in the hope that we the people would just believe what
they say, and not look at what they do with an analytical eye. They
think that all they have to do is repeat the lie a bunch of times, from
different people, and we’re too stupid to see what they are doing and
therefore won’t doubt their veracity.
Yet again Obama and his Democrat cronies are lying to us, hoping we
will just believe what they say and not think for ourselves. Think again
Mr. Obama. We have your number!
Are you sold on tax increases as part of the debt limit negotiations?
I’m not! I’m sold on lower taxes, lower spending, less regulation,
smaller government, and no debt.
Don’t just believe what Obama, or anyone else, including me, tells
you. Check out the facts for yourself and then speak up in the public
Posted July 18, 2011
Are the Democrats running scared as the tension and the rhetoric
heats up in the months leading up to the 2012 Presidential primary
In February Martin O’Malley, Governor of Maryland, blamed the GOP
debt negotiators for undermining the economy so that Obama will loose
the 2012 Presidential election. Recently he said Republican governors
should urge GOP lawmakers to make a deal with Obama to increase the
government’s borrowing limit before the August 2nd deadline
when the U.S. faces financial default; and that the GOP is led by
Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas implied during a House floor speech
Friday that raising the debt ceiling was being held up by members of
Congress because President Obama is black, saying “What is different
about this president that should put him in a position that he should
not receive the same kind of respectful treatment of when it is
necessary to raise the debt limit in order to pay our bills?”
Hold on to your sanity, because the Democrat play book speaking
points for the 2012 Presidential election are being tested and refined
right now, based on early reactions by the rank and file. The speaking
points will be used by Democrats in the public forum to incite Democrat
voters to action through accusatory fear tactics that invariably seek
the outcomes of ambitious, vindictive, rapacious, and jealous desires.
The Democrats are running scared from their 2010 mid-term election
losses, and that makes them very dangerous. This means we, the
Conservatives, need to refute every one of their statements as soon as
they are spoken in public. We cannot let them hang in the air
unchallenged, or they just might stick.
So when O’Malley said that the GOP is led by uncompromising
hardliners, we need to point out that the only uncompromising hardliner
in the debt negotiation talks has been Obama, who has never budged from
his position of requiring increased taxes as part of any debt limit
Fox News reported on July 7th “Obama’s proposal, according
to multiple outlets, will be to build on the $1.5 trillion already
agreed upon (a mix of cuts and projected interest savings on the cuts)
by getting Republicans to agree to his $400 billion tax-increase package
(which includes lower tax deductions for individual charitable giving
and higher taxes on business inventories).”
So when O’Malley said that the GOP is led by uncompromising
hardliners, he is really saying in Dem-speak that ‘even though we the
Democrats are really the uncompromising hardliners, we will say in
public that the GOP is in the hopes that people will just believe what
we say and not look into the facts.’ When in fact the reality of being
uncompromising hardliners points directly at the Democrats and their
When Lee implies that the Republicans are going against Obama’s plan
for the debt limit increase by raising taxes just because he is black,
she is doing us a great disservice by trying to use race in a valid
ideological discussion over taxes, spending, and the national debt.
Race is not, and has never been, a part of this discussion. So in
bringing it up Lee is trying to incite the Democrat voters into a frenzy
against Republicans in the hopes that the discussion will shift away
from debt to race. Anyone who plays the race card in an attempt to sway
the national discussion is just showing that they are lacking good ideas
to add to the mix.
The discussion needs to be about each side’s view of the facts and
the possible solutions. It’s ok that we don’t agree, as long as we don’t
try to obfuscate the public discussion with emotion inducing rhetoric,
name calling, and calumny. We need to be able to speak our views openly
and honestly in the public forum in order to come up with a rational
solution to an apparently insurmountable public problem.
Any use of inflammatory rhetoric to hamper free speech in the public
debate goes against the fundamental principles upon which this great
nation was founded. Free speech is the chief cornerstone of the freedom
and liberty granted us in the Constitution.
Please make your views known in the public discussion over the debt
limit. It will ensure a better solution to the immediate problems that
face us today.
Cut, Cap, and Balance
Posted July 19, 2011
Amid statements by Moody to eliminate the debt limit altogether in
order to ensure our credit rating remains high, by Obama and the liberal
Democrats that we need to raise the debt limit and offset it with higher
taxes, and by Obama promising to veto the Cut, Cap, and Balance bill,
our conservative Republican friends in the House and Senate are holding
to their 2010 election commitment to reduce government spending.
The Cut, Cap, and Balance bill offers substantial cuts in spending to
ensure that the deficit can be reduced more and more every year,
enforceable spending caps with the objective of balancing the budget,
and a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution which would include
a spending limitation and a required super-majority to raise taxes. This
bill should be acted on by both the House and Senate this week.
So far the GOP leadership, aside from McConnell who is sucking up to
Obama and the Democrat leadership with his own recommendations, is
sticking to their statements of not allowing the debt limit to be raised
with additional taxes and without any real reductions in spending, and
until the Cut, Cap, and Balance bill is passed.
This is an important bill in a number of ways. First, it shows us
that our newly elected Congress men and women are fully intentioned to
meet their 2010 campaign commitments to the electorate. They are doing
what they said they would do, even if the legislation fails to pass or
if it does pass and is vetoed by Obama.
Second, this bill sets the stage and tenor for the 2012 Presidential
election dialog, focusing on spending, taxation, and debt. This is an
important discussion to have at this time in the public forum.
Third, this bill glaringly exposes those who are on the side of lower
spending, lower taxes, and lower debt, and those who are on the side of
more spending, more taxes, and more debt; something to remember at
And fourth, it’s the right thing to do for the financial security of
our great country.
Personally, I cannot fathom how someone could think more spending,
more taxes, and more debt could be anything but harmful to our economy
and therefore to our families. But then I have to remind myself that not
everyone has the best interest of the country and their families in
their hearts and minds.
In the words of Alexander Hamilton related to the causes of hostility
due to private passions in
Federalist #6, “Men of
this class, whether the favorites of a king or of a people, have in too
many instances abused the confidence they possessed; and assuming the
pretext of some public motive, have not scrupled to sacrifice the
national tranquility to personal advantage or personal gratification.”
That is, some use their public motives to hide their personal gains from
the light of day.
I have a difficult time understanding how anyone would want to run
the country differently from how they run their personal life; and since
not spending more than I have is a tenet of my life, I believe it is a
good tenet for government as well. But then I remember the lives of
Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, political adversaries, each of
whom died leaving their families in overwhelming debt.
Is this what we want for our children and children’s children? We
cannot in good conscience leave them with the unpaid bills of our
unbridled rapacious desires? It’s time to reign in Congress and Obama!
Tell your Representatives and Senators to pass the Cut, Cap, and
Balance bill. Speak up in the public forum for lower taxes, lower
spending, less regulation, smaller government, and no debt.
Washington fuzzy math
Posted July 20, 2011
This morning’s headlines read “Senate Republicans Show Flexibility in
Debt Debate” on FoxNews.com, and “Analysis: ‘Gang of Six’ breathes life
into debt debate” on News.Yahoo.com. You know this has to be one great
deal proposal when Obama embraces it, and Reid says it’s really
extraordinary. The only one who we haven’t heard from is Pelosi, who is
too busy to worry about the deficit and debt limit issues.
The new proposal “claims $3.75 trillion in savings over a decade,
including about $1.2 trillion in new revenues and reforms that could
result in a net $1.5 trillion in tax cuts,” says Richard Cowan of
The Associated Press says “The Gang of Six plan promises almost $4
trillion in deficit cuts, including an immediate 10-year, $500 billion
down payment that would come as Congress sets caps on the agency budgets
it passes each year. It also requires an additional $500 billion in cost
curbs on federal health care programs, cuts to federal employee
pensions, curbs in the growth of military health care and retirement
costs, and modest cuts to farm subsidies.”
Based on my understanding, they’re using Washington fuzzy math, which
means that spending cuts over ten years really refers to lowering future
increases to spending that would have to be agreed to by future
Congresses, budget caps each year means that these caps would also have
to be agreed to by future Congresses, and reforms that could result in
tax cuts means that they would have to get future Congresses to vote on
these future tax cuts. The only element of the plan that would happen
immediately, according to Washington fuzzy math, is the 1.2 trillion
dollars in tax increases, called revenue increases in Washington-speak.
So basically this plan says Congress can raise the debt limit and
increase taxes today for promises of possibly lowering the deficit,
spending, and taxes tomorrow. No wonder Obama embraces this plan! It’s
everything he wants and nothing he doesn’t want. It’s his plan coming
from another supposedly bipartisan source.
This Gang of Six plan is just business as usual in Washington.
Nothing’s changed! Tell the people what they want to hear and then go on
doing what you want to do. It’s time to say NO to Washington fuzzy math.
On the other hand, the Cut, Cap, and Balance bill that passed the
House yesterday by a vote of 234 to 190 guarantees real spending cuts
now, enforceable spending caps now, and a Balanced Budget Amendment to
the Constitution now. All of these would be binding to this and future
Congresses; and all without any new taxes.
This President, his political cronies, and Congress are destroying
our once great economy with excessive legislation, regulations, and
spending. Businesses will not expand or hire under these economic
conditions because of the financial uncertainty brought on by this
President, his political cronies, and Congress. Until this uncertainty
goes away, job opportunities and the dollar will continue to shrink.
We need real change now, not Washington fuzzy math! We need lower
taxes, lower spending, less regulation, smaller government, and no debt
NOW. This country is not too big to fail.
Tell your Senators that you want the Cut, Cap, and Balance bill
passed now; and then congratulate your Representatives for passing the
bill yesterday. Speak up in the public forum for real change NOW.
No short term deal!
Posted July 21, 2011
President Obama is now saying he is open to a short term deal while
the details of a long term debt limit solution are in the works, since
there is not enough time to hammer out the details of the long term
solution between now and August 2nd.
May I remind you that August 2nd is not a real deadline!
The federal government takes in enough revenue, taxes and fees, every
month to be able to pay the interest on our debt and write the monthly
checks for retirees, veterans, and the disabled. After that, anything
left over can be prioritized, that is fought over, by Congress until
there is no more money left for the month. Gee, maybe Congress will get
a true feeling for how most of the people in the country live, from
paycheck to paycheck, trying to make ends meet.
It appears that many of the old school, go along to get along
Republicans are falling like dominos to bow at the feet of the short
term solution idea. They are without any backbone to fight for the
majority position of the rank and file Republicans and conservatives
across this great country. They have absolutely no original ideas of
their own, except maybe how to spend the money in their campaign coffers
to get reelected, so they can continue collecting more money at the
expense of the security and stability of the country.
I know. That’s awfully cynical. But, I am one who likes to look at
history, past performance, to gage how someone will act in current
situations. Almost a half century of working in the private sector,
starting with part time jobs in high school, has taught me to look at
reality with an analytical eye; and it has taught me that zero-sum
budgeting, not spending more that you take in, is the only way to
survive long term.
In a May 13th Gallup poll 47% said they oppose raising the
debt limit and only 19% were in favor; a July 13th Gallup
poll points out that of “the majority of Americans who are following the
U.S. debt ceiling issue very closely, 53%, say they want their member of
Congress to vote against raising the debt limit”; and in a July 18th
poll “Gallup finds that Americans, by a 42% to 22% margin, are more
likely to want their representative in Congress to vote against rather
than for an increase in the federal debt ceiling, with 35% saying they
have no opinion”.
The right solution is very clear. Do not raise the debt limit under
any circumstances; force Congress and Obama to live within their means;
and do not allow Congress to raise taxes. In fact, in order to breathe
new life into our slumping economy, we need lower taxes, lower spending,
less regulation, smaller government, and no debt.
Perpetuating or ignoring a problem will only make it worse. We must
address these issues today, not tomorrow. Procrastinating will only make
the issues that much harder to deal with later. A maxim in business that
always worked is “it’s better to take your lumps now, than get knocked
Tell your Representatives and Senators to say NO to a short term debt
deal, and to fix the problem now. Speak up in the public forum.
Posted July 22, 2011
Today the Senate voted 51 to 46 to table the Cut, Cap, and Balance
bill passed by the House, meaning they essentially voted to not vote on
it, which is different than voting on the bill itself. Politics has its
nuances just like any other field of endeavor.
Why did the Senate vote not to vote on the bill? That’s so they could
say with a straight face that they didn’t vote against the Cut, Cap, and
Balance bill, since the majority of the American people say they want
real cuts in spending, along with real caps in future spending, and a
requirement for a balanced budget.
In the words of John Boehner, House Speaker, “Senate Democrats have
defied the will of the American people who overwhelmingly support real
spending cuts, caps on future spending, and a balanced budget to create
a better environment for private-sector job growth. Republicans are
standing with the American people and, as I’ve said before, will not
pass a bill that fails to cut spending by more than it increases the
debt limit, restrain future spending, or that raises taxes on families
and job creators. To help avoid a default, I urge the Senate to rethink
their decision and immediately approve the responsible, balanced,
House-passed ‘Cut, Cap, & Balance’ proposal.”
Harry Reid, senate Majority Leader, has again played his
obstructionist role perfectly. Rather than allowing a straight up or
down vote on the Cut, Cap, and Balance bill passed by the House, he has
tabled the bill indefinitely, thereby ensuring that the Senate never has
to vote on it.
Reid is not interested in what is best for the country, or even in
what the majority of the American people want; he is only interested in
what is best for Reid and the Senate Democrats.
Then, after having the chutzpah to complain about the House taking
Friday off after doing what they stayed in session to do, he sends the
Senate home for a long weekend. What a hypocrite.
I think that if the American people are really in favor of cutting
spending, capping spending, and ensuring a balanced budget, then they
will make sure that Reid and his obstructionist Democrat cohorts will
not survive their next bid for reelection to the Senate. That’s the only
way we have to deal with these kind of people under the Constitution.
Now the ball is back in Boehner’s court. He and the Republican
Representatives must hold the line on the desires of the rank and file;
they must not allow any debt deal that does not contain real spending
cuts of an equal dollar amount and no tax increases as the only criteria
for allowing the debt limit to be raised.
Please join with me in congratulating the House Republicans for a job
well done, and encouraging them to hold the line on the wishes of their
voters, to continue to be men and women of integrity who can be counted
on in tough times as well as good.
Tell your Representatives we need real change now; we need lower
taxes, lower spending, less regulation, smaller government, and no debt.
Speak up in the public forum for real change now.
Why the big rush?
Posted July 24, 2011
This weekend has been a bust for coming to agreement on what to do
about the supposed need to raise the debt limit. The Boehner and Obama
talks have gone nowhere because Obama is stuck on taxes; the House and
Senate discussions with Obama in the Cabinet Room of the White House
have also gone nowhere, as expected; and the Boehner, Reid, Pelosi,
McConnell meeting also produced no tangible results.
Obama is sulking in the White House; Reid is accusing GOP leaders of
intransigence, according to FoxNews.com; Pelosi went back to doing
whatever she thinks is more important than the debt limit issue; Boehner
went back to drum up another proposal with the House Republicans to
raise the debt limit against the Republican electorate’s wishes; and
McConnell went off who knows where.
The truth of the matter is, unless one side caves, there will never
be an agreement between them, since the Democrats and Obama want the
debt limit raised with more taxes and no spending cuts, the Republicans
want spending cuts to allow the debt limit to be raised and with no more
taxes, and the American people have made themselves very clear that they
do not want the debt limit raised or any more taxes (See my July 21st
post, No short term deal!).
What I don’t understand is why, according to multiple media sources,
do they appear to be so desperate to show enough progress to head off a
plunge in stock prices when Asian markets open ahead of the U.S.
workweek? Isn’t it a little late to be worrying about the stock market?
This is Washington insanity at its worst! Don’t they get it? Read my
lips. The American people do not want the debt limit raised; they want
Washington to stop spending money we do not have; and they certainly do
not want any more oppressive job-killing taxes on individuals and
So then what will happen when the August 2nd deadline,
which is probably as artificial as the last one Geithner gave us, comes
According to the U.S. Treasury’s March statement, the U.S. government
took in 128 billion dollars in net tax revenue, and paid out 1.1
trillion in expenses, 705 billion of which were for redeeming Treasury
securities. Of course, there was no mention of the additional dollars
taken in for Social Security, Medicare, and all the fees collected in
March. There seems to be a one-sided picture being painted by the
Geithner Treasury Department.
The answer is that the government will have to decide what to pay
with the actual dollars they have; and this task falls on Obama’s and
Geithner’s shoulders. Pity, Obama may be too busy to make his daily
boring complaining press conference, or even get in a round of golf; but
I bet he finds a way to go on vacation.
First they will have to pay the interest on the debt, then they will
have to pay retirees, veterans, and the disabled, and then they will
have to decide which bills are the most important to pay until they run
out of money for the month. Then Obama can do what he does best, he can
sweet talk those not getting paid into being patient waiting for their
checks, which may never come, or tell them to find another sugar daddy
to suck money out of. A job he’s well suited for.
It’s time to stop the bleeding of our hard earned money. In Obama’s
words, we will hit a small bump in the road. Then the markets will go
down, our credit rating may even get downgraded, we will pay the bills
we can, renegotiate the rest, and will eventually get this country back
on sound financial ground. We have done it before, and we can do it
again; and we’ll be all the stronger for it.
If we don’t do this now, then the problem will get that much more
difficult when we are forced to do it, with the worst case scenario being
total financial collapse, worse that the Great Depression.
Please tell your Representatives and Senators to bite the debt bullet
now, not later. Tell then we need lower taxes, lower spending, less
regulation, smaller government, and no debt now. Speak up in the public
President and Congress are addicted!
Posted July 25, 2011
It has become increasingly clear to me while watching the unfolding
debt limit machinations in Washington over the past couple of months
that the President and Congress are addicted to spending money they do
not have on programs and giveaways we do not need.
No one is above reproach in this uncontrolled spending addiction, not
the President, not the Democrats, and certainly not the Republicans.
Everybody seems to think it’s ok to spend money we don’t have. When will
this Washington madness stop?
I do however have to give the freshman House Republicans a lot of
credit for keeping the pressure up on the old guard Republican
establishment. With my praise comes my hope that they will not let up
until they stop Obama and the tax and spend Democrats from raising the
debt ceiling, from increasing taxes, and certainly from not cutting real
spending, that is we can’t just cut future spending.
They are actually bucking the trends. It seems to me that new
Representatives and Senators always promise to change how Washington
works when they are running for office, but get caught up in the way
things actually work in the established political environment, try to
fit in, and then never do what they promised. I can only pray that these
new House Republicans have more integrity and fortitude than those who
have preceded them.
Here’s some supporting data from a CNN/ORC Poll of adult Americans
conducted by telephone by ORC International on July 18-20, 2011.
Question 23 asked “In another proposal, Congress would raise the debt
ceiling only if a balanced budget amendment were passed by both houses
of Congress and substantial spending cuts and caps on future spending
were approved. Would you favor or oppose this proposal?”
Of the respondents, 66% were in favor of the Cut, Cap, and Balance
proposal which was passed by the House and tabled by Reid so the Senate
would never have to vote on it. I wonder what Reid was so afraid of?
I must point out that in reading through the other questions and
answers of the poll, I detected a strong sample bias, that is a bias in
who was picked for the poll, toward the left. But that’s something I
would expect of anything coming from CNN. In light of their inherent
left leaning bias, the answer to question 23 is even more astounding,
since the answer really means that of the “left leaning” respondents,
66% were in favor of the Cut, Cap, and Balance proposal.
What would the results have been if they asked a statistically
balanced audience the same question? Clearly the answer would be a much
higher percentage in favor of the Cut, Cap, and Balance proposal.
Please join with me in encouraging the new House Republicans not to
give in to Washington politics and the way things have always been done.
It’s time for a new way of doing business in Washington. It’s time for
lower taxes, lower spending, less regulation, smaller government, and no
debt now. Speak up in the public forum.
Obama, Boehner, Reid – Act 2
Posted July 26, 2011
Last night was the end of the 2nd act in the latest Washington drama
“As the Debt Limit Spins Out of Control”. It wasn’t well acted, it
didn’t make any profound life statements, and it sent people home
wishing the went to bed earlier. Yet another display of Washington
dwellers knowing the right way to solve the problem of the debt limit
and the deficit, but prolonging the debate in rhetoric, showmanship, and
First Obama took the stage with his 15-minute monologue as statesman
in chief. A new role for him, as he sets the stage for his bid for
reelection in 2012, and to hell with jobs and the economy. He starts his
monologue with his all too familiar Bush bashing; thinking if he blames
someone else long enough, maybe none of the bad stuff happening
during his watch will stick to him.
He said, “For the last decade, we have spent more money than we take
in. In the year 2000, the government had a budget surplus. But instead
of using it to pay off our debt, the money was spent on trillions of
dollars in new tax cuts, while two wars and an expensive prescription
drug program were simply added to our nation’s credit card.”
Of course he forgot to tell the American people how much the
stimulus, all the bailouts, the purchase of GM and Chrysler, and
ObamaCare also added to our nation’s credit card; and that he was
personally responsible for adding 3.14 trillion dollars to the nation’s
credit card in just over two years, driving it up to a whopping 14.3
trillion. It must have slipped his mind in the excitement of his big
Then he took the high ground, like he’s the one who has been trying
to fight the ills of all the Congressional out of control spending,
saying “Now, every family knows that a little credit card debt is
manageable. But if we stay on the current path, our growing debt could
cost us jobs and do serious damage to the economy.”
It sounds like he really cares about jobs and the economy. But
where’s the beef Mr. President? Can you point to one thing you did in
the past two plus years that added jobs to the private sector, or
lowered the national debt?
At last count, since early 2009, pre-stimulus, the U.S. economy has
lost 2.4 million jobs and the government credit rating is on the verge
of being downgraded; and then there’s all the silent regulations that
Obama’s administration has imposed on businesses, small and large,
including those caused by ObamaCare, that have caused private sector
businesses to go into emergency protection mode by limiting spending and
deferring all new hiring.
Then Obama spent the rest of his time pushing his notion of a
balanced approach through compromise. Of course his balanced approach,
as we’ve seen over and over again, is to cut defense spending, Social
Security, Medicare, to promise additional spending cuts in the future,
which never actually materialize, to increase taxes and regulatory
costs, and to continue increasing the debt limit to cover the increasing
He stressed balance and compromise, when all he will do is to
continue to tax and spend the U.S. economy down the toilet.
It’s time to stop the Washington madness. Obama and the Democrats are
tax and spend addicts. We cannot compromise with an addict. The only
solution is to take away their credit card and cut it up forever.
Then Boehner took the stage for his 5-minutes in the spotlight. He
said some correct things, like “Millions are looking for work, have been
for some time, and the spending binge going on in Washington is a big
part of the reason why”, and “in Washington more spending and more debt
is business as usual”, and “the American people will not accept an
increase in the debt limit without significant spending cuts and
My issue with Boehner, and with all the old guard Republicans, is
that they think compromise is a good thing. But it’s not when compromise
means raising the debt limit once again under any circumstances; when
compromise means cutting future spending, not current spending; when
compromise means not capping spending to some percentage of GDP; and
when compromise means not passing a balanced budget amendment to the
Boehner says all the right things in his public statements, but all
his political maneuverings behind the scenes points to compromise and
duplicity. I think he would sell out the American people, and especially
the Republican voters, in an instant if it meant keeping his power and
prestige in Washington.
Don’t be fooled. The current Boehner plan does not cut current
spending, but leaves the spending decision to a committee, which may or
may not actually cut real spending, ever. In addition, his committee
could even raise taxes.
Now is not the time for political maneuverings and compromise. Now is
the time to hold the line on forcing the Cut, Cap, and Balance proposal
to be accepted. No other solution will even begin to fix the real
problem in Washington, which is addiction to taxing and spending to
increase power and prestige.
Then the infamous Reid spoke, according to the AP, saying “a debt
limit standoff between Democrats and the Republican-led House is being
driven by GOP extremists”, and “Republicans are more interested in
trying to embarrass President Barack Obama than in doing what’s right
for the country”, and “the GOP is being led by the ‘radical right
wing’”, and “such extremists should not be allowed to determine how the
battle is resolved”. In addition, Reid also stressed compromise.
Not much national coverage for the renowned Senate Majority Leader
Reid. He’s been shuffled off to the background in insignificance. Maybe
it’s because he has nothing relevant to add to the public discussion,
and hasn’t for a long time.
I find it interesting how Obama, Boehner, and Reid are all willing to
compromise to solve the debt limit issue facing the nation. They all
want to compromise to fix a problem they all created through past
compromises. Compromise is the sign of a weak individual who wants to be
liked and accepted more than they want to do the right thing for the
The right thing for the country now is to cut up the national credit
card and send our federal politicians into rehab. The right thing is to
cut real spending now, to cap future spending now, and to pass a
balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution now.
Please contact your Representatives and Senators now; and tell them
we want lower taxes, lower spending, less regulation, smaller
government, and no debt now. Speak up in the public forum.
Posted July 27, 2011
More information is coming to light since Obama’s speech on Monday
evening, when he blamed Bush, said he had to spend more because there
was less money coming in, and exhorted Congress for a balanced approach
to solving the debt issue and for compromise.
Both Obama and Geithner have been publicly implying that there will
be a financial meltdown if the debt limit isn’t raised before August 2nd.
Obama even went so far as to say that he cannot guarantee that retirees,
veterans, and the disabled will receive their checks on August 3rd
if the debt limit isn’t raised.
The mainstream media, and even the more moderate internet media, have
played the dupe in continuing to promote the looming crisis to the
dollar, to retirement funds, to stocks, to home prices, and to whatever
else they can think of. If Academy Awards were being given out today,
they would definitely get the one for “best supporting dupes in a
The truth of the matter is that it’s all Alinsky style rhetoric and
fear tactics. Keep the masses off balance and afraid of an impending
crisis and then they can do just about anything they want to do under
the cover of the hysteria.
In fact, behind the scenes, Obama and Geithner are telling the
financial institutions that they have absolutely no intention of
allowing the U.S. government to default on its debt, whether or not
Congress raises the debt ceiling. They have also been telling people
that they will make sure the debt and other critical payments, like
Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans, and the military, will
definitely be paid first.
Doesn’t it make you feel all warm and fuzzy to think how the
President, who was elected to steer us through all the problems that
come up on his watch, is really using the difficulties to his and to the
Democrat party’s own political advantage; and the voters be damned?
It makes me angry! The deceit and duplicity of this President in his
lying to the public is unconscionable. Not only do we have to worry
about our own financial difficulties, whether or not we will make it
through retirement on the meager nest eggs we have planted financially,
or whether or not we will be able to stay in our homes and not be
foreclosed on, but we also have to worry whether or not our own
President is telling us the truth.
Maybe it’s time to throw the bum out. I for one have had my fill of
his Chicago style thuggery and Saul Alinsky style tactics. Maybe it’s
time for the American people to call for Obama’s impeachment.
If Obama can’t be honest with us at a time when a supposed crisis
looms over us, how can we ever depend on him to honor his oath of office
and do what’s best for the country and the people in a real crisis?
Given Obama’s deceit and duplicity, now it’s more important than ever
to contact your Representatives and Senators. Tell them to hold the line
on the debt limit, and that we want lower taxes, lower spending, less
regulation, smaller government, and no debt now. Speak up in the public
Boehner’s stepping into a trap
Posted July 28, 2011
The more I see how the current debt limit crisis plays out, the more
I realize that when a newly elected Representative or Senator gets to
Washington they loose all their critical thinking skills as they get
sucked into the Washington political game.
It’s a political game where compromise is the alter at which everyone
bows repeatedly every morning, where doing the right thing for the
American people and for the country is considered a vice and not a
virtue, where having integrity and sticking to principles is considered
a curse and not a blessing, and where getting a piece of legislation
passed both houses and signed by the President no matter how detrimental
to the economy is good enough for celebration.
What is wrong with this picture?
Boehner and the House Republicans should be ashamed of themselves for
this atrocious piece of legislation that will come up for a vote today.
It is another piece of legislation to address the fabricated debt limit
crisis. It seems to pull from parts of the Reid proposal and from parts
of the Gang of Six plan, and yet the Senate has unanimously said they
will vote it down, and Obama said he will veto it.
What’s going on? Who can interpret this Washington political dance
Erick Erickson, in today’s post on RedState.com titled “Our
Admiral Ackbar Moment — It Is A Trap”, gives a good
explanation from his point of view. He says it’s a trap to blame the
whole mess on the GOP when everything blows up with no solution; he’s
very convincing, given how I’ve seen other political conflicts play out
this way in the past.
But then, even if Boehner and the Republican-led House send another
bill similar to the Cut, Cap, and Balance bill, or even if they send no
bill at all, Obama and the Democrats will blame everything on the
Republicans come election time. That’s what they do! And the Republicans
fall for it every time.
When will the Republicans learn?
So what is the best course of action for the House Republicans at
this time? I think they should side with 66% of the American people who
were in favor of the Cut, Cap, and Balance proposal in the recent
Question 23. I think they
should do nothing. They already sent two proposed bills, and both were
voted down by the Democrat-led Senate. Yes, even tabling a bill so they
don’t have to vote yes or no is the same as voting no!
Doing nothing would turn the tables on Obama and the tax and spend
Democrats; it would allow the Republicans to say that it was the
Democrats who failed to act in a responsible way. But of course this all
assumes that doing nothing will blow up into a full scale financial
crisis. However, according to Obama and Geithner, they are telling the
financial institutions that they have absolutely no intention of
allowing the U.S. government to default on its debt, whether or not
Congress raises the debt ceiling.
This has all been a fabricated crisis for political purposes, not a
real crisis. This is the way Obama and the Democrats work. They
manufacture a crisis so that they can get the Republicans to try to
solve a no-win scenario; then they blame the Republicans for not solving
the problem; and then they miraculously find a last minute way to fix
the problem that never existed in the first place, making themselves out
to be the heroes in the blue cape who were able to fix everything in
spite of the evil Republicans.
It’s time to wake up and smell the political dung. Hold the line on
Cut, Cap, and Balance!
Do nothing else!
Tell your Representatives and Senators to hold the line on the Cut,
Cap, and Balance bill. Tell them we want lower taxes, lower spending,
less regulation, smaller government, and no debt now. Speak up in the
Kudos to House conservatives
Posted July 29, 2011
Boehner has not been able to get the necessary majority in the House
to support his latest bill of appeasement on the fabricated debt limit
crisis. When it comes to the out of control spending by Congress and
Obama there should be no compromise.
So far the House conservatives have had the temerity to hold the line
on the needed cuts in future spending. I want to make sure we all give
them their much deserved kudos for having the integrity and fortitude to
stick to their campaign promises to the American people who elected them
in 2010. I also encourage them to not give up the fight by going down in
compromise like everyone who has had their office before them.
The Boehner plan calls for a committee to manage spending cuts in the
future. A committee made up of twelve members, four each appointed by
Boehner, Pelosi, Reid, and McConnell. Even if we could trust that
Boehner’s four would be conservative, could we make the same assertion
about McConnell’s four? What about the other eight?
McConnell is a compromiser and an appeaser. He has consistently
derived his power from getting along with the other side and by
controlling the Senate Republicans into going along. Is this the kind of
man we want appointing four committee members who control the purse
strings of Washington? Remember that this committee could just as easily
raise taxes as cut spending.
The House conservatives must not allow this committee idea to become
a part of the new legislation. They cannot give away their ability to
control the purse strings, and to control tax increases. To do so would
be too fiscally irresponsible.
In addition, there should be no increase in the debt limit under any
circumstances. To increase the debt limit would be tantamount to making
a deal with the devil, assuming you believe that evil exists.
It’s all the debt limit increases by every President since Reagan,
taking the debt limit from under 1 trillion dollars to almost 14.3
trillion today, which have gotten us into this mess. So then why would
we want to perpetuate it any longer?
This is a rare moment in time, but even Obama can be right when he
said that some debt can be ok; I paraphrased. For example, a mortgage is
a good thing, as long as it’s not causing me to bleed cash and to need a
new loan every year in order to stay afloat. In the same vein, some debt
by the federal government is ok, as long as it doesn’t make us have to
continually borrow more to make the payments on the old.
Please contact your Representatives and Senators today, and tell them
we need real spending cuts, a real cap on future spending, a balanced
budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and no compromise committee
with the authority to control the federal purse strings.
We need lower taxes, lower spending, less regulation, smaller
government, and no debt now. Speak up in the public forum.
Boehner and McConnell sell out American people
Posted August 1, 2011
Well, Boehner and McConnell have gone and done it! The have sold out
the American people, and especially the Republican rank and file, by
agreeing to a debt limit deal that cuts the 10-year deficit in two
steps, 900 billion now and 1.5 trillion by the end of the year, allows
the debt limit to be increased by at least 2.1 trillion in a series of
complicated dance steps, and creates a super committee of 12 to address
the deferred 1.5 trillion part of the deficit cuts.
Here are the problems I see with this terrible deal. The biggest
issue is the creation of a super committee to try to do what Congress
could not, which is cut 1.5 trillion in spending now, the amount equal
to the current deficit.
Anyone who is honest about their experience with committees in the
private sector, and past committees in Congress, knows that the work
product of a committee is usually the least common denominator of the
group; that is, the result is something everyone hates. and no one
thinks solves the real problems set out before them.
In addition, there is nothing to stop this super committee from
raising taxes as a way to cut the deficit by the required amount. Notice
that the wording does not say that they will cut spending, only that
they will cut the deficit, which mans they can accomplish their stated
goal by raising taxes.
How stupid do they think we are?
So this sell-out deal agreed to by Boehner and McConnell as the
“Budget Control Act of 2011” is terrible for and goes against the
desires of the American people, and especially Republicans.
This flawed deal does not guarantee lower spending, which is the real
problem, by one thin dime now; it does not guarantee that taxes will not be
increased when what we need is decreased taxes and regulations to get the
economy back into a healthy performance range; it does create a super committee
that only has to come up with ways to lower the deficit and not spending; and it
does raise the debt limit enough to not have it be an issue for Obama and the
Democrats during the 2012 election season.
What a great deal for Obama and the Democrats!
Then Boehner rubs salt in our wounds by saying, according to
TownHall.com, that “the pact he’s reached with President Barack Obama
and other leaders of Congress on lifting the debt limit and taming the
budget ‘isn’t the greatest deal’ but lives up to the GOP’s principles on
taxes and spending.”
Well, that’s not true!
The last thing that McConnell said yesterday was that the deal was
close. He’s seems to have gone into hiding again, something he’s good at
doing during difficult times when he’s sold out his party rank and file.
Obama, Reid, and Pelosi are silent at the moment, since they don’t
want to praise the deal and risk jinxing it; if they come out for it now
the Republicans are more likely to vote it down. They are staying quiet
and holding their collective breath till it passes. Then they will use
it as a club to beat the Republicans over the head during the election
season; and then they will use the super committee as a way to raise
taxes, as they have wanted all along.
My recommendation is that we, conservatives, make it our mission to
remember every Republican who votes for this sell-out bill and make a
concerted effort to get them out of office in their next time up for
election, especially Boehner and McConnell.
Please contact your Representatives and Senators today, and tell them
to vote NO for the “Budget Control Act of 2011”.
Tell them we need lower taxes, lower spending, less regulation,
smaller government, and no debt now. Speak up in the public forum.
House Republicans sell out American people
Posted August 1, 2011
The House of Representatives have passed the “Budget Control Act of
2011” by a vote of 269 to 161; and now it will move to the Senate, where
it is expected to pass with little or no difficulty tomorrow.
Many on the right say this is the best deal we could get at this
time, or it’s a significant step in the right direction. Maybe they’re
right. If reasonableness and compromise are the desired outcome, then
the House Republicans have achieved what they set out to do. They have
made their deal with the devil, and now they will have to live with the
And consequences there will be! They have accepted miniscule spending
cuts and a certainty of increased taxes in exchange for allowing the
debt limit to be raised. They refused to hold the line and have
therefore sold our future and our children’s future for their own power
in the Washington political game.
Today’s vote will allow the debt limit to be raised from 14.3
trillion to at least 17.3 trillion by the end of the year; and this will
only support Washington’s avaricious spending through the 2012 election
Their actions today are unconscionable!
They have economically raped the country once again. Will we let them
get away with this rapacious behavior?
Please contact your Representatives today, and tell them of your
dissatisfaction with them for allowing the “Budget Control Act of 2011”
to pass the House.
Tell them we need lower taxes, lower spending, less regulation,
smaller government, and no debt now. Speak up in the public forum.
An Open Challenge to the Tea Party
Posted August 4, 2011
I think that the House and Senate conservatives who voted against
this latest bill to raise the debt limit deserve the loudest and longest
praise we can give them in the public forum. My heart and support stands
with them in the battle that has just begun. Knowing how the Democrats
operate, it will be a very bloody road to victory in 2012.
On the other hand, I think that the House and Senate conservatives
who voted to pass this latest bill must be considered traitors to the
cause. They stared into the face of the enemy and caved. In my
estimation they were not willing to stand up to the heat of the moment;
and they certainly ran in fear for their political lives.
TeaParty.net, the voice of the Tea Party movement, sent out an email
yesterday praising Boehner for passing the Cut, Cap, and Balance bill in
the House. I agree, he did a great job by stepping aside and letting the
conservatives in the House run with the bill.
But then they went on to say “The political reality that the Tea
Party butted up against, is that absent a deal to raise the debt
ceiling, President Obama and his many allies in the media would have
blamed every single negative event between now and the election on the
failure of Speaker Boehner and the Tea Party to make a deal. Every bad
economic report, every lossed job, every storm, injury, and spilled cup
of coffee in the country would have been turned into another attack on
Tea Party inflexibility.”
It sounds to me like the Tea Party leadership is afraid of the
upcoming election battle, which will be very bloody and in the political
gutter, and therefore wasn’t willing to stand up for their principles
and integrity in the debt limit battle. The Tea Party is just spinning
their message like every other political group in Washington. Maybe they
spend too much time with the enemy, and are too much a part of the
Washington scene, to fight the fight the way it needs to be fought.
Now there are times when these tactics, which were called a hit and
run battle of attrition by George Washington during the Revolutionary
War, are appropriate. George Washington used these methods very
successfully because he knew that the British fighting machine, when
confronted head to head in the European style of battle then popular,
was far superior to the outnumbered rag tag Continentals, who had no
real fighting experience, very little discipline, very little food, very
little dry ammunition, and no warm clothes for the winter.
However, George Washington knew he was not really fighting a battle
against the British army, but against the resolve of the British people
and the British Parliament. Everyone who remembers the Viet Nam War
knows that those were the same tactics used against the United States,
causing us to eventually tuck our tails between our legs and leave Viet
Now, coming back to today, can we apply these same ideas to the Tea
Party battle against the Democrat Party? The Democrat fighting machine,
which includes the mainstream media, is a much more seasoned fighting
force in gutter politics and they have an enormous set of resources to
draw from, including money, media talent, advisors, and true believers.
But this is where the similarity ends.
There is no large group behind the Democrat army whose resolve can be
shaken to the point of abandonment. The Democrat voters, for the most
part, will blindly follow the Party with minimal complaining. There is a
fundamental ideological connection between the leaders, the fighters,
and the people that in my view can never be shaken; much like the
connection on the conservative side.
The real battle today is for the hearts and minds of the Independent
voters; and they had already been won over in the debt limit battle,
according to poll numbers published by multiple sources over the last
Where the Tea Party strategically went wrong is by underestimating
the determination and resolve of the majority of the American people,
who I think would have supported the future battles completely if the
Tea Party weren’t so afraid to fight the current one to the death,
rather that putting their tail between their legs and running.
Hopefully all is not yet lost! All we need to do is understand our
enemy and learn from our mistakes. No one ever learns anything from
being right all the time.
So, my open challenge to the Tea Party, which I presented to them in
private to no avail and no response this week, is this:
“Will you publish a list via your daily emails of every House and
Senate supported Tea Party candidate elected in 2010 and how they voted
on the newly passed debt limit bill? It will be nice to see you give the
earned kudos to those who held the line and voted NO, and publicly point
out those who voted YES. Otherwise you will have fallen into the same
trap that has ensnared every other political group that has preceded you
into oblivion. Which is more important: integrity or donations?”
Now it’s time to let the American people be the judge.
Please contact the Tea Party, who only has this public email address
firstname.lastname@example.org, and let
them know your opinion. Please speak up in the public forum.
After the Debt Limit Battle
Posted August 5, 2011
A number of interesting things started happening during and after
Obama and the Democrats won the debt limit battle. Yes, I said “won”.
They got the debt limit raised, they got to cut some future spending,
not current spending, and they got a super committee which can raise
taxes, not cut spending, to manage the deficit. That sounds like a win
The Tea Partiers, which now seems to be the media’s generic term for
any conservative who wants to cut real spending without raising taxes,
are being called “terrorists”, “delusional addicts”, and any other name
that strikes the fancy of a liberal. No facts required.
According to AFP News, the real debt hit 14.53 trillion dollars on
the same day that Obama signed the new debt increase bill into law,
which is the same as the reported GDP at the end of 2010. I guess they
couldn’t wait even a day to start spending the 900 billion dollar
increase in the debt limit. And now the national debt is 100% of the
GDP. The hits just keep on coming.
Ever imagine what your life would be like if your personal debt
equaled 100% of your annual earnings? You certainly wouldn’t be living
the American dream. Wait ten years and today will be looked on fondly as
the good old days.
We the people need to find a way to stop this irresponsible spending
madness in Washington now!
On August 2nd Gallup published the results of a
poll of random adults
with interesting results: 46% of all Americans, 64% of Republicans, 50%
of Independents, and 64% of Conservatives disapprove the debt limit
deal. Only 39% of all Americans approve the deal.
On August 3rd Rasmussen published the results of a
poll of likely voters
nationwide with these results: 53% disapprove the debt limit deal, and
only 22% approve; 75% of Republicans and unaffiliated voters disapprove,
40% of Democrats disapprove, and without providing the actual numbers
the report says “Conservative voters strongly oppose the deal while
liberals are evenly divided.”
The poll results are not quite what Obama, Boehner, and Reid were
looking for in this deal. But then I don’t think they really care what
the American people think, or even how much we are hurting financially
at their hands.
They still have their huge salaries and the best pensions and
healthcare that our money can buy. Maybe they should share in our pain
by giving up their salaries and pensions and by being the first to use
ObamaCare. Ah, one can hope for change, can’t they?
How much more can we the people take?
It’s time to speak up in the public forum for lower taxes, lower
spending, less regulation, smaller government, and no debt now. Make
your views heard.
Curses! Foiled Again!
Posted August 6, 2011
Everything Obama, Boehner, and Reid thought they were doing to
curtail the financial institutions they magnanimously funded with our
bailout dollars has happened anyway. Standard & Poor (S&P) just
downgraded the US credit rating from AAA to AA+ for the first time in
Now what’s their great plan?
It’s always interesting, as a Washington outsider, to watch the
machinations they go through during the lead-up to passing a
controversial piece of legislation, like the debt increase bill. But one
thing seems to be consistent since Obama became president, and that’s
the fact that they think they know better than the American people
what’s good for us.
What makes them think they are so psychologically in tune with the
thinking of the American people? Is it because they think they are
smarter than we are, since they were capable of getting elected to a
major public office? Do they think they can ignore the poll data by
Gallup, Rasmussen, CNN, and others and do whatever they want with
For the life of me I cannot fathom what goes on in the brain of a
politician. Maybe they can all donate their brain to science so we can
begin to understand why they think they are so much smarter than we are.
Wait. I got it! Maybe the fact that their thinking is so far superior
to ours, the common people, that they are the real cause of global
warming. You know, from all the heat generated from such great thinking.
I guess they really blew it this time, though. Since, as a result of
their great legislation to increase the debt limit, they never realized
that both the American people and S&P would think that cutting real
spending to manage the national debt was the best possible solution, and
not just spending more. The American people and S&P just don’t really
understand Keynesian economics. Right?
Wrong! We understand the ramifications of Keynesian economics just
fine. Anyone who tries to live their life by spending more than they
earn learns very quickly that they have dug themselves in a
hole that will take many years to dig out of. It just doesn’t work in
the real world!
So now we the people have to live with the ramifications of what
Obama, Boehner, and Reid have wrought.
The S&P downgrade will mean higher interest rates on the 14.53
trillion dollar debt, which means more of the monthly budget will have
to go to paying the interest on the debt, leaving less for principle and
other budget items. This translates into needing to raise the debt limit
sooner than planned; or God forbid cutting real spending. I can just
feel all the liberal Democrats cringing at the idea of cutting real
The downgrade also affects everyone with an adjustable mortgage, an
equity line, or looking to get a new mortgage. Yup, higher interest
rates. In addition, higher interest rates on credit cards, on car loans,
and on student loans; and higher inflation on the basic necessities of
life like food, clothing, gas, electricity, heating oil, and much more.
Anyone remember the Carter years? Worst case scenario puts us right
back in that situation, or maybe even worse.
Is this what we want for our future, or the future of our children? I
Please tell your Representatives and Senators to stop their out of
control spending spree now. Tell them we want lower taxes, lower
spending, less regulation, smaller government, and no debt now. Make
your views heard in the public forum.
Deficit Reduction Now
Posted August 9, 2011
In the midst of a sliding stock market, a 635 point drop yesterday in
the Dow Jones industrial average, continuing high unemployment numbers
reported last week, 9.1% of the workforce unemployed 25 weeks or less,
and a credit rating downgrade last Friday by S&P, from AAA to AA+ for
the first time in US history, it makes me wonder what can Obama and his
oh so intelligent minions do next to screw up our economy.
In their infinite wisdom Bernanke and Geithner are putting their
heads together to see what they can do next to try to fix the financial
mess they have gotten us so far into it will take decades to dig out. I
have absolutely no confidence that they know what they are doing or
supposed to be doing in order to make things better. Their problem is
that they are reading from the same flawed play book of Keynesian
economics, which has never worked in the real world.
What will they do? Of course they’ll do the same old thing. They will
lower the fed’s interest rate to artificially keep mortgage, car loan,
and credit card interest rates down while the economy swirls around the
drain; and they will print some more money in another round of
quantitative easing, thus devaluing the dollar and raising prices on
everything we buy.
We’ve seen this fairytale before. Federal employees ride in to rescue
us on their big white horses, do something that stalls the problem from
getting much worse while they’re in office, and then ride into the
sunset to collect their fat pensions and great healthcare for life; and
we’re stuck with a bigger mess when the brown stuff hits the fan the
They have to know what they are doing in order to solve real world
problems. And these guys do not!
Then we have our brilliant Democrat and Republican lawmakers in
Congress and their super committee which will solve all our problems.
Wrong! Our lawmakers are so totally in touch with the needs and
desires of the American people, that they think the only way to solve
our problems is to raise taxes. Oh, not directly; now they are talking
about cutting out all the subsidies, deductions, and preferential
policies of the tax code. This way they can say with a straight face “We
never increased taxes; we just cut spending on tax deductions.”
But the bottom line is the same! Every individual and every business
will be paying more taxes, unemployment will get worse not better, and
the economy will continue to swirl down the drain.
Don’t get me wrong! I’m very much in favor of a flat tax, which is
what they will wind up with except for the progressive tax rates, where
every one pays the same percentage on every dollar they make, whether
it’s one dollar or a billion dollars. That way people are incentivized
to make more and spend more to make more, thus creating more jobs for
everyone. You know the concept; Reagan called it supply side economics,
which really worked to stimulate the economy back to health after the
Carter economic destruction years.
So why is it that the only way Obama, his appointed officials, and
Congress ever think of to fix our economic woes is to print more money
and raise taxes? They have such one-dimensional thinking! Not one ounce
of creative problem solving skills!
We cannot ever solve our out of control deficit problems by
continuing our out of control spending. Mathematically it will never
work. And printing money and reducing tax loopholes is spending, by
other names. They still smell awful!
The American people understand the problem and understand how to
solve the problem. We’ve seen some of the poll results over the last
month; 46% of all Americans disapprove of the recently enacted debt
limit increase deal that triggered the US credit rating downgrade; and
66% of adult Americans are in favor of the Cut, Cap, and Balance
proposal passed by the House and stalled by the Senate.
In a new Rasmussen poll, only 17% of likely US voters think the
federal government today has the consent of the governed, a fundamental
principle contained in the Declaration of Independence, and 69% believe
the government does not have that consent. Maybe the American people are
on to something!
When will our elected officials get the message that the American
people are sending them loud and clear? When will they stop their
spending now, limit their future spending to some percentage of GDP, and
enact a balanced budget amendment to the US Constitution?
Maybe they will only get the message when the American people, that’s
you and me, rise up and take back our country, when we vote the
offenders out of office. Anyone who voted against Cut, Cap, and Balance
should be voted out of office; and anyone who voted for the current debt
limit increase bill should be voted out of office. They just don’t get
Please get involved in the upcoming 2012 election cycle any way you
can, and support all those who promise true deficit reduction through
lower taxes, lower spending, less regulation, smaller government, and no
debt now. Make your views heard in the public forum.
The End of an Era
Posted August 11, 2011
The election of Obama has served to mark the end of an era for the
American people, and I think we are just beginning to realize this fact;
an era that ended with Carter’s leaving office in abject failure for not
having the ability to address the difficult problems facing the nation,
including out of control inflation, double digit interest rates, and
With the election of Obama in 2008 this generation of voters have
received and heard a loud wake-up call. Obama’s inability to address the
difficult issues facing our once great nation, having been the catalyst,
shows clearly how bad a choice Obama was for the office of President of
the United States. A fact that even the left is beginning to realize,
and talk about behind closed doors and as unnamed sources.
The interesting thing is that Obama could have prevented, or even
delayed till he left office, the issues facing the country if he had any
innate problem solving abilities, of if he chose minions with
capabilities he clearly lacks. I learned through many years in the
technology industry that the credo of a good manager is to hire people
better than I at their job, then get out of their way, and give them all
the support and guidance I can.
You might say that the serious problems facing Carter are not the
same as those facing Obama, and on the surface you’d be right.
Out of control inflation is not an issue today. But it would be if
the Treasury wasn’t printing money to buy up their own securities to
keep inflation numbers artificially low, and if the numbers were
reported the same as then, but now energy costs are excluded. The
underlying cause is the same, but our government has gotten just that
much smarter about hiding the inflation since Carter.
Double digit interest rates are not an issue today. But they would be
if the Federal Reserve didn’t say this past week that they would keep
interest rates for financial institutions artificially low, thus keeping
interest rate for mortgages and other loans and credit artificially low.
The underlying cause is the same, but again our government has gotten
just that much smarter since Carter.
Unemployment is an issue today, but then the numbers reported by our
government are not the real unemployment numbers. They only report the
percentage of the workforce that has been receiving unemployment for 25
weeks or less; so anyone receiving unemployment for more than 25 weeks,
and anyone who no longer receives unemployment, are not reported in the
numbers. That’s why we see some articles from time to time that say the
real unemployment is somewhere between 20-25%.
However, we the people are slowly waking up to the realities of the
economic mess this once great nation has gotten itself into, with Obama
hell bent on spending more than they can raise in taxes and fees, with
Congress not holding the line on the debt limit, and with Obama’s
minions, like the EPA and NLRB for example, regulating small and large
businesses out of existence and killing any real job creation
possibilities for the future.
It’s important to keep the pressure on Obama, Congress, and everyone
else in the Washington superstructure. We all need to do our part by
speaking against their socialistic redistribution practices and for
lower taxes, lower spending, less regulation, smaller government, and no
Make your views heard in the public forum.
A New Beginning
Posted August 12, 2011
Last night’s Republican primary debate in Iowa was a great prelude to
the upcoming real change we are hoping for; a new beginning to eradicate
Obama’s spending, taxation, regulation, and massive debt off the backs
of the American people and businesses.
However! We must ask ourselves if we are we willing to continue a
long protracted fight for this type of change. Are we willing to ride
the conservative ground swell building in the hope of taking back our
country for civility, security, and prosperity?
The looming battle will be fierce and in the gutter ugly; because
that’s the only way that cornered Democrats, Alinskyites, and Keynesians
know how to fight. We saw a small piece of it yesterday when the leftist
activists verbally assaulted Romney at the Iowa state fair; and we saw
the diabolical monster emerge briefly in the Wisconsin recall elections
this week. They are crude, rude, vicious, and unrelenting!
The debate and the candidates, while interesting, didn’t look overly
presidential. There were some good ideas, like Gingrich thinking the
debt super committee was the dumbest of ideas, and like Bachman thinking
that Congress shouldn’t have gone on vacation with unsolved issues left
on the table. Although, it showed us that Republicans can get into
scrappy discussions and survive unscathed, which I don’t think is a bad
thing; but there was no clear winner, just a broad field that still
needs serious pruning.
On second thought, maybe Perry was the clear winner for not
participating in the debate. As a conservative, so far he looks like a
good possibility as the candidate we can rally around. He is a fiscal
conservative, having reduced property and business taxes in Texas, he
has been fighting against Washington’s intrusions into Texas authority
for all things Texas, he has worked for aggressive job creation and a
friendly business climate in Texas, he has taken the lead for border
security in Texas, and he is a social conservative, standing against
abortion, against embryonic stem cell research, and for traditional
The only real issue I see facing the Republican party, and
conservatives specifically, is can we stand tough together against the
abusive calumny spewing out of the mouths of liberal Democrats and their
mainstream media puppets in the upcoming battle for the Presidency. This
will not be a pleasant battle. But the only way out of the mess our once
great nation is in is to stand tough together in the heart of the
Now is the time to make a commitment to yourself and to your country
to be the catalyst for ushering in a new era of fiscal and social
conservatism. Please stand with me in this endeavor and make your voice
heard in the public forum.
Good News: Washington’s on Vacation
Posted August 15, 2011
It’s a quiet summer day, with not much happening in Washington since
Congress is not in session. Some are trying to make a big deal about
them being on summer break when the economy is in such bad shape, but I
think it’s a Godsend. The more time they stay away, the less damage they
can do to the country, and especially to the economy.
Obama too is leaving Washington to start his bus tour of rural
America to talk about jobs. But it seems all he does is talk about
issues, and never really solves any. We all know that the only job he is
interested in is his own. According to
Gallup, his current job
performance has earned him a new low of 39% approval for the 3-day
rolling average during August 11-13.
His bus tour will be so grueling for him that he will need to
recuperate for nine days on Martha’s Vineyard when it’s done. It’s an
absolutely beautiful getaway in the summer.
As I see it, Obama just doesn’t get it. The reasons for high
unemployment and low job creation start right at his own front door.
Except for a mini tech boom in Silicon Valley, thanks to Facebook and
Google, large and small companies around the country are holding back on
hiring, for the most part, because of the uncertainty created by unknown
ObamaCare costs and the real possibility of new taxes as the solution of
choice by the super committee to stem the tide of the growing national
Both translate into higher costs for companies; and if they want to
maintain reasonable profits then they have to control other costs, like
salaries for new hires, or in some cases like salaries for existing
employees through layoffs.
But Obama and the left do not understand the concept of
profitability. Unlike government, private companies go out of business
when they spend more dollars than they take in. Government, on the other
hand, just keeps on borrowing more, and printing more dollars to pay
back the loans. If a company tried to do something similar, all its
executives would be prosecuted for fraudulent business practices and the
company would probably go belly up.
The more Obama talks about jobs and the economy, the more he is
indicting himself as an incompetent leader of the free world. Of course
free is relative, since a debtor is slave to the one to whom he owes
So during these quiet summer days, with Obama and Congress out of
Washington, we have time to reflect on what has transpired during this
past year, and to look forward to how we would like the next year to
I, for one, believe we need to keep the pressure on Congressional
Republicans to hold the line on spending, taxes, and debt. This coming
Congressional year I would like to see Washington cut the national
deficit to zero, which means cutting spending by about 1.5 trillion
dollars, without raising any new taxes.
Is this too much to ask for? If we can hold them to this goal, we
will have erased half of the uncertainty facing businesses, and we will
see more new jobs slowly begin to be created. The only way to get jobs
created faster is to overturn ObamaCare as well.
I can dream, can’t I! Dream with me. Put more pressure on Congress to
reduce the deficit to zero by cutting spending with no new taxes, and to
overturn ObamaCare. What a glorious year it will be if we the people can
accomplish this together.
Please make your views heard by contacting your Representatives and
Senators and by speaking out in the public forum.
It’s Not My Fault!
Posted August 17, 2011
Investor’s Business Daily (IDB) has a great headline for yesterday’s
editorial that says it all, “Editorial:
Did Bo (Obama’s Dog) Eat The Recovery?” In it they review
Obama’s blaming Bush, ATM’s, Republican partisan politics, gridlock in
Washington, the media, businesses that won’t hire, and the misfortunes
of Arab spring, Japan’s tsunami, and Europe’s financial woes for his
inability to turn around the US economy.
IBD nailed it. Next we will be hearing Obama whine about his dog
eating his recovery plan; one which no one has ever seen. Obama’s
current life quote should come from the movie A Few Good Men, spoken by
Tom Cruise’s second chair, “I have absolutely no responsibility here
I don’t know about you, but I never appreciated it when anyone who
worked for me gave me excuses for why some plan never materialized, or
some program never worked. I learned very early in my career, and
personal life, to take responsibility for my screw ups, realizing that I
learned more from my mistakes that I did from my successes. It’s simple
human nature for one who wants to continue to learn and improve himself.
It doesn’t work, however, for one who thinks they are God’s gift to
humanity, and can personally do no wrong. Obama is just a victim of
Wrong. Obama is a narcissist, like a junky chasing the high of
reelection. His biggest downfall is he doesn’t have the slick eloquence
of a Bill Clinton, or the tricky subterfuge of a Richard Nixon, or the
popular support of a John Kennedy. The only thing that is transparent
about the Obama administration is Obama himself.
He is riding around middle America talking about jobs in two 1.1
million dollar busses built in, and bought from, Canada, when all it is
really is a series of campaign stops with typical say nothing campaign
speeches at taxpayer expense. At least Bush had the sense to use
campaign funds for his campaign bus tour. Talk about transparent
Obama has no clue as to how to solve the nation’s current woes, since
he has never had any job in his life that required him to solve real
problems. As a community activist, all he needed to know is how to talk
tough about problems in order to stir up the people to action against
the evil establishment.
Well, he’s succeeding in stirring up the people. In addition to
stirring up the Republican base, he is also stirring up large portions
of his Democrat base against his policies and ineptitude.
It’s time for we the people to take back out nation from the
leftist thugs who only want to destroy jobs, families, and communities
with their tax and spend wealth redistribution policies.
Please don’t let them continue destroying our once great country. Get
involved and speak up in the public forum.
The Dismantling of America
Posted August 19, 2011
Is there a correlation between Obama circumventing Congress by
illegally granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens and the recent
Gallup poll of Hispanic Americans showing a drop from 85% Obama approval
in the spring of 2009 to an all-time low of 45% at the end of July 2011?
Obama wouldn’t go against the laws passed by Congress just to shore
up his voter support in the Hispanic community, would he? Anyone who
thinks he wouldn’t is extremely naïve about both human nature and
According to the state of today’s moral rectitude, any law, any
custom, any practice can be circumvented or set aside in order to get
what you want. And Obama wants to get reelected, so anything goes.
Is there a correlation between the BLS published
July 2011 unemployment
rate of 9.1% of the workforce being unemployed for 15 weeks or less, or
14.4 % of the workforce being unemployed for 27 weeks or more, and the
Obama administration’s anti-business job killing regulations, which also
Obama says he wants to create more jobs; in fact he just had a
supposedly grueling 3-day jobs bus tour through middle America to
promote increased jobs. He wouldn’t just pay lip service to wanting more
jobs while really campaigning, would he?
In fact, the only real jobs he wants to create, aside from his own,
are public sector jobs at the expense of taxpayers, small businesses,
and private sector jobs.
Are these the kind of jobs we the people want? Absolutely not!
Is there a correlation between Obama’s new fuel efficiency standards
and the increased cost of new cars, estimated to be $11,000 per car,
which translates into fewer new cars sold, and therefore fewer overall
jobs in the automobile industry? Clearly Obama’s intentions are good,
Is there a correlation between higher gas prices and Obama’s decision
not to allow any more offshore deep water drilling, and his decision to
block the construction of any new oil refineries?
Is there a correlation between higher energy costs and Obama’s
decision to make it impossible for coal burning electricity generating
plants to continue operating?
While there is not a mathematical correlation that can be proven at
this time for any of these, there certainly is the perception of a
correlation that is intuitively obvious to the casual observer.
Are you beginning to get the picture? Obama is not about creating
jobs, or making it less expensive to live, or making it cheaper to get
around; Obama is about destroying the American dream as we know it.
Boyd Richard Boyd, in his article “The
Anti-American President” on today’s AmericanThinker.com
website said it best, “Obama is not a failure at his job – his job is
the failure of our country.”
Today is the day that we need to speak up against what Obama is doing
to our once great country, to speak up against his dismantling of the
American dream. If we don’t speak up today, we will wake up one day to
find that we can no longer speak up, because our First Amendment rights
have been abrogated along with our rights to life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness. Is this what we want for ourselves and for our
Support the only real change that matters today; support the
dismantling of the left’s progressive tax and spend redistribution of
wealth agenda promoted by Obama and his socialist minions.
Support the dismantling of the Obama administration and all the
policies he has enacted without the authority of the legislative branch
of our constitutional government.
Support the retirement of Barack Hussein Obama.
Please make your views heard by speaking up in the public forum.
Government Cannot Create Jobs
Posted August 22, 2011
Is it possible for our government to create jobs? The simple answer
is yes. But at what cost to the taxpayer? The problem is that for every
100 thousand dollar a year job created, the average cost to the tax
payer is about 127 thousand dollars, not counting retirement costs.
This means that if our government wants to cut the number of people
unemployed 15 weeks or less from 9.1 %, as published by the BLS on
August 5th, to only 5%, it would cost the taxpayers a mere 800 billion
dollars a year for these individuals, not counting future retirement
Does this sound like something we really want government to do?
So what can government do?
The best role for government is to create an employment friendly
environment in which private businesses can grow enough revenue to be
able to add the additional 6.3 million jobs to get us down to a 5%
unemployment rate; and the only way for businesses to grow more revenue
is for government to help them cut their costs of doing business, which
means cutting taxes and cutting regulatory costs imposed by ObamaCare,
the EPA, the NLRB, and the like.
As an aside, you might think that government also needs to help
American businesses be more competitive in the global marketplace;
however, in my experience, the American business man and woman is very
competitive on their own, and can come up with very creative ways to
stimulate and increase business without the government’s help. In my
experience government only gets in the way of solid marketing.
So the real answer is no, government cannot really create jobs in any
way, shape, or form.
But government does need to cut its spending by 1.5 trillion dollars
just to be able to stop accumulating more debt. If they could do this
much right away, then our credit rating would go back up to AAA and
business would begin to feel more comfortable to start creating new
However, ObamaCare is also still an uncertain expense hanging over
the heads of businesses; until it is eliminated, businesses will not
feel comfortable enough to bring us back to our reasonable goal of 5% or
In addition to cutting spending, though, we also need to cut revenues
by a significant dollar amount, since cutting spending will only begin
to control the size of our national debt, and cutting taxes, ObamaCare
costs, and regulatory costs by a significant dollar amount will create a
better environment for small and large businesses to create even more
I believe that the light at the end of the fiscal mess our government
has gotten us into over the past thirty plus years is a two pronged
strategy of cutting spending and cutting revenues; and this needs to be
done no matter how difficult it is for politicians or for the people who
have gotten used to free handouts from our sugar daddy government.
Now is the time for we the people to get tough on politicians
to do the right thing. We must keep up the pressure on them to cut
spending, cut taxes, and enact a balanced budget amendment. Just because
there is no current crisis, we cannot back off our goals for a fiscally
sound America for our children, and our children’s children.
We need to keep up the pressure 24/7! Contact your Representatives
and Senators and tell them you want them to cut spending, cut taxes, and
enact a balanced budget amendment now. Speak up in the public forum any
and every way you can.
Bernanke Cannot Fix the Economy
Posted August 25, 2011
It never ceases to amaze me how man’s ego can lead him so far astray
from sound business practices. So as not to be accused of singling any
one person out, like Bernanke, this appears to be a general malady of
the male ego, and, as the male and female roles continue to merge
together in today’s society, of the female ego as well.
Self deception is a potent aphrodisiac. We all fall prey to it,
unless we have trusted friends and advisors around us who, through long
experience, are willing to tell us we are full of it when necessary.
It seems to me that Bernanke is one such individual who puts more
faith in his own abilities and instincts than in sound business
practices; and he certainly surrounds himself with people who are only
willing to tell him what he wants to hear.
My dad, an executive in one of the big eight accounting firms, taught
me to cut my business losses as soon as I became aware of them. Like a
dead body hidden in the basement, financial problems only get smellier
with age. It is a practice that has served me well throughout my working
years; and it only works if I am willing to listen to the advice of
friends and colleagues.
So now it’s time for Bernanke to have a come to Jesus moment related
to the economic woes of our once great country. Now is the time to bite
the bullet, admit defeat, rise to the occasion, and truly fix the
problems that have us swirling down the fiscal drain.
Now is not the time for quantitative easing three (QE3)! Like all the
other Obama administration fixes to the problems of our time, he must
not fix the symptoms and ignore the underlying causes. All QE3 does is
release some of the short term pressure on the economy by printing more
money for buying up some of the government’s debt.
This will add some short term stability at the expense of a long term
fiscal nightmare. It will devalue the dollar once again, so that
everything we own will be worth less, and everything we want to buy will
cost more, especially food, clothing, gasoline, electricity, natural
gas, coal, and the like.
So, what can Bernanke do to fix the underlying problem? Assuming we
can agree on the underlying problem, then the fix is reasonably self
I believe the problem is an out of control federal government that
spends too much money it doesn’t have, over taxes individuals and
businesses to the point of oppression, over regulates areas that stifle
business growth, and has too much outstanding debt relative to the size
of our economy.
And given these problems, the fix is straight forward: drastically
cut spending, cut taxes, remove burdensome regulations, reduce the size
of our national debt, and require a balanced budget every year by
passing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.
Doing this will fix the real problem facing our nation, and not just
put a Band-Aid on the symptoms as Bernanke wants to do.
Contact your Representatives and Senators and tell them you want them
to cut spending, cut taxes, remove burdensome regulations, reduce the
size of our national debt, and enact a balanced budget amendment now.
Speak up in the public forum any and every way you can.
Stop Trying to Fix Things!
Posted August 27, 2011
We are beginning to hear rumblings from the bowels of America’s elite
thinkers about the great Obama economic recovery plan of 2011. Now that
he has had time to get away from his grueling job of making campaign
speeches and press conferences he finally has time during his Martha’s
Vineyard vacation to think deeply about how to solve the economic woes
facing this once great nation.
It appears as though at least part of Obama’s plan to revive the
failing economy is to re-inflate the housing bubble by offering low
interest rate mortgages to Americans with poor credit.
You know, the same erudite progressive strategy that started under
Clinton, continued unchecked under Bush, blew apart in 2008, and caused
millions of homes in the US to go into foreclosure, and continuing to
I guess the vacationer-in-chief and the progressive Democrats really
enjoyed the economic rollercoaster ride that put millions of families
into homes they couldn’t afford, with practically no money down, very
low interest rates, and no incentives to pay the bills.
What a brilliant idea. In stead of making life more stable for
millions of families who couldn’t have afforded a home in the first
place, they hurt the ones they thought they were trying to help, along
with many more.
Since it didn’t work the first time, let’s try it again. Clearly
Obama is head and shoulders smarter than Clinton and Bush, so his
administration will do it the right way. Maybe this time he can destroy
the entire housing market, along with the investments of all the honest
hard working Americans who didn’t scam the system for a free housing
What’s the definition of insanity? Trying to do the same thing over
and over again and expecting different results.
This is the most idiotic idea I have heard coming out of Obama and
his minions. By providing low interest rate mortgages to Americans with
poor credit, Obama will again victimize the less fortunate Americans
among us; and he will also victimize those Americans who are trying to
live their life in a fiscally sound and reasonably conservative way.
However, fiscally sound and reasonably conservative are terms that
raise the neck hairs of Obama and his progressive Democrat friends, who
portray themselves as the savior of the poor and down trodden, when
actually victimizing them to keep themselves on top and in power.
They keep their power, as do their union thug supporters, by keeping
the American people in a constant state of crisis and turmoil, and then
by disparaging any ideas that aren’t their own, and by calumniously
ridiculing anyone who disagrees with them.
It’s time the American people begin to see it like it really is. It’s
time for all of us to hold up a spotlight to the atrocious behavior of
Obama, his minions, and the progressive Democrat elite. It’s time we
tell them to stop trying to fix things! They only make them worse in the
Now is the time for all right thinking men and women to call it like
we see it. Now is not the time for politeness and political correctness.
Now is the time for everyone to stand up and speak out in the public
forum any and every way we can.
Posted August 29, 2011
Is there anyone left in the country who still believes that we can
continue to spend our way out of the economic doldrums following the
2007-2009 recession, other than Obama and the like minded Keynesians he
surrounds himself with?
I suspect there are a few hard core liberal tax and spend Democrats
left who will never admit to the failure of their economic ideology;
just like there were Soviet Union communists who would never, and could
never, admit to the failed policies of their political ideology, even
after the fall of the USSR.
But maybe it’s time to sit up and take notice of the failure of
Obamanomics. As we know from history, recessions happen. They are a
natural cycle of business and economics; just like warming and cooling
are the natural cycles of weather.
IBD, the average recovery
time after a recession has been just over 2 quarters, since the Great
Depression. Except for now! Our current weak “recovery” is at 8 quarters
Obama and his minions are good at blaming others, like Bush,
business, the rich, Arab unrest, European economic upheaval, the Tea
Party, Republicans, the tsunami, the earthquake, the hurricane, ATMs,
and even all of us who are ungrateful and won’t spend more money we do
not have to help our once great country dig itself out of the hole
Obama’s failed economic policies have put us in.
How ungrateful can we be!
But it is Obama and his advisors who should be grateful to the
American people, who put them in office and in power without any real
Shame on us for electing a president who never had any real
experience in leading people, managing budgets, or solving difficult
economic problems. Community activism and Acorn only prepared him to
speak tough and stir up others to action, never to survive in the real
Obama and his policies are a failure. It’s time for the ground swell
of discontent to sweep him out of office, overturn his failed policies
like ObamaCare, and protect ourselves and our country from all future
incompetent Obama types.
Now it the time for our own tsunami of political retribution for two
and a half years of incompetence and failed economic policies. Now is
the time to say enough with printing more money to cover up the
underlying economic issues. Now is the time to say enough with economic
stimulus packages that gives our hard earned money to Obama’s political
cronies as payment for helping vote him into office.
Now is the time to say no to spending money we do not have. Now is
the time to limit future spending to some reasonable percentage of GDP.
Now is the time to stand up and say we want a balanced budget amendment
to the US Constitution in order to prevent this from ever happening
Now is the time to contact your Representatives and Senators, to
speak up in the public forum any and every way you can.
Posted August 30, 2011
CNSnews.com reported on
“partnership” agreements US Labor Secretary Solis signed with the
embassies of Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, and El Salvador in
order to, as she said, protect the labor rights of both legal and
illegal migrant workers here in the United States.
Solis went on to say that the purpose of the agreements is to educate
migrant workers, no matter how they arrived on US soil, and to protect
their rights under US law against abuse in the workplace, wage
discrimination, job loss, and deportation.
In addition, Solis has signed agreements over the past year with the
embassies of Mexico, Nicaragua, and Guatemala.
Does this annoy you as much as it does me? I am outraged at how the
Obama administration does everything it can to devalue America, American
workers, and the meaning of American citizenship.
I suppose since Obama didn’t grow up in this country, and didn’t have
to scrap and scrape to become a citizen of America, he puts very little
value on what it means to be here legally.
Obama, through his minion Solis, appears to be illegally and
blatantly violating US law, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA),
which is aimed at protecting only documented workers legally here in the
These agreements provide a way for Obama to go against the will of
the American people, and the laws of the United States enacted by
Congress, by establishing all on his own an illegal amnesty program that
steals jobs from American workers.
With the latest unemployment numbers showing 9.1% of the workforce
has been on unemployment for 15 weeks or less, that’s 13.9 million
Americans, is this the best way to help the unemployed and the
underemployed, estimated at over 20% in total, find much needed work?
Obama is again taking money out of the pockets of hard working
Americans, whose only difficulty is that there are not enough jobs to go
around, and ensuring that it goes to people who are in the United States
illegally. And he is taking food out of the mouths of American workers
and their families and giving it to undocumented workers here illegally.
Is this the kind of man we want as our President, sworn to uphold the
laws of the United States?
He is certainly not the man who can represent my views on how this
once great country should be run. How about you?
It’s time for the great citizens of America to rise up and fight back
against the tyranny imposed on us by the current President, Barack
Hussein Obama. It’s time to show him what can be done legally to ensure
that he does not get elected ever again. It may even be time to show him
what can be done legally to throw his sorry excuse for a President of
the people out of office before his term is up.
It’s time to contact your Representatives and Senators and tell them
you do now want to allow Obama and his minions to devalue America and
American citizenship. Speak up in the public forum any and every way you
Posted August 31, 2011
Boehner and the House Republicans are planning legislation to begin
to regulate all the out of control regulations coming out of the Obama
administration, currently with no Congressional oversight.
All administrations have done it, and so Obama continues the practice
with flare; but that doesn’t mean it is right to allow the Executive
branch to impose regulations that cost billions of dollars a year to
follow and to watchdog.
Obama just sent a letter to Boehner explaining seven new regulations
he is looking to sign, four from the EPA related to the environment, and
three from the DOT related to transportation; each of which are
estimated to cost the American people at least 1 billion dollars a year.
One of these new regulations is for new and improved smog standards
that alone will cost the American people an estimated 19 to 90 billion
dollars a year.
So, the question of the day is ‘should the Executive branch of
government be able to impose regulations on the American people and on
businesses without the consent of the governed through the Congressional
oversight and consent process?’
If you answer yes to the question, then you are in favor of the
Executive branch having unchecked authority to impose regulations that
raise the cost of gasoline, coal, heating, automobiles, houses,
clothing, and many more important necessities of life.
Is that really the kind of unchecked Executive power we want to
When our country was beginning to discuss the issues inherent in the
proposed Constitution, the biggest issue, aside from slavery, was how to
balance the power of the Executive and the Legislative branches. Amidst
the fears of the Executive becoming like the oppressive British
monarchy, they realized that there needed to be some strength to pull
the country and the people together in times of national emergency, like
the Revolutionary War, and in standardizing services, like finance and
transportation and commerce.
On the other hand, the states were not willing to hand over their
self-governance to a central authority without some abilities to check
the centralized power. That’s how the bicameral legislature was born;
one branch, the House, to represent the interests of the people and
control spending, and one branch, the Senate, to represent the interests
of the States and control treaties.
We have already destroyed the Legislative balance with the 17th
Amendment, which took the election of Senators out of the hands of the
States and put it in the hands of the people. Are we going to allow the
destruction of the Executive-Legislative balance by not allowing
Congress to regulate Executive regulations?
The Legislature is the representative of the people and the States in
the legislative minuet orchestrated by our founding generation in the
design of the US Constitution. Are we willing to give up our right yet
again to the Executive branch of the federal government?
I say no!
It’s time to speak up against the out of control unchecked power at
the hands of the Executive. Whether or not you like this president, or
the next, eventually there will be one who totally abuses the authority
of his office.
Now is the time to check the unchecked power of the Executive. Now is
the time to contact your Representatives and Senators to tell them to
regulate Executive regulatory power via Congressional oversight and
Now is the time to speak up in the public forum any and every way you
Our Thirty-something President
Posted September 1, 2011
CNN/ORC International just released the results of a national
poll of adult Americans
conducted last week, and the results make Obama our “thirty-something
Obama has only a 34% approval for how he is handling the economy, and
a whopping 65% disapproval. That means almost 2 out of 3 Americans do
not think Obama is handling the economic woes of our country at all
That’s no wonder, when all he can think to do is raise taxes on
people who are already hurting economically, increase spending of money
no one has, continue to push forward his aggressive regulations that
stifle business growth and private sector job creation, and force
businesses to hire illegal undocumented workers even when they don’t
Wait. Isn’t Obama also an undocumented worked, albeit the most
prominent. No wonder he and Solis are coming up with ways to enforce
illegal immigration amnesty against the will of the American people and
In addition, CNN/ORC reported that 7 of 10 independents and 9 of 10
Republicans disapprove of Obama’s economic record. Wow! Things don’t
bode well for Obama’s political future with these kinds of numbers.
They also reported that only 33% of Americans approve of how he is
handling the deficit; and only 37% of Americans approve of how he is
dealing with unemployment.
In my estimation, the 34%, 33%, and 37% approval numbers gain him the
inestimable prize as our “thirty-something president”.
The economy, the deficit, and unemployment are not problems easily,
or even ever, fixed by Keynesian tax and spend ideology; and all Obama
can do is follow the plays from the ideological leftist playbook he
knows. He is totally devoid of creative problem solving skills that
allow him to think differently than he was taught.
Is this the kind of person we want to run our beleaguered economy and
country? Is Obama a man of, by, and for the people when only
thirty-something of them actually approve of his handling of the
economy, the deficit, and unemployment? Is he able to change his spots
and think creatively in order to even begin to solve our most critical
The answer to all these questions is a resounding NO!
So what are we waiting for? Now is the time to marginalize Obama and
his minions through the rule of law, which he so blatantly disregards.
Now is the time for Congress to prevent him from enacting any more
job-killing regulations or taxes, to prevent him from spending any more
money we do not have, and to prevent him from harming businesses any
more than he already has.
Maybe now is even the time to throw his sorry excuse for a president
of, by, and for the people out of office before his term expires.
Now is certainly the time to tell your Representatives and Senators
to hold the line on taxes, regulations, and spending. Now is the time to
stand up and stop Obama’s campaign of devastation waged on our once
Now is the time to speak up in the public forum any and every way you
Labor Day 2011
Posted September 5, 2011
According to Wikipedia,
Labor Day celebrates the
economic and social contributions of workers in the United States. It
was first introduced by the Central Labor Union of New York and
celebrated on September 5, 1882; and it is now a federal holiday that is
observed on the first Monday of September.
I guess today, 129 years later, is a good day to ask about the
current value of these economic and social contributions that we
celebrate across our nation.
I understand the benefits provided union workers when they were in
their formative years. They championed to plight of the worker at the
hands of employers who were willing and capable of taking advantage of
laborers. They were overworked, underpaid, and treated like indentured
It was the collective bargaining rights of the labor unions that gave
the workers a voice in their own well being as workers. They were
finally on an equal footing with the heavy handed tactics of their
Today, however, we are seeing the demise of the labor unions because
their economic and social contributions, which were so necessary in the
beginning, have become oppressive, heavy handed, and strong armed. They
have switched roles with the employers of old.
Today we see big labor forcing employers into agreements that are
economically unsustainable and socially predatory. Today the union
leaders and workers want the lion’s share of the rewards from the
business or the government department. They are no longer just
interested in sharing in the money; they seem to want it all, and are
willing to do anything necessary to get it all.
It’s no wonder why union membership is steadily on the decline; and
why Wisconsin and New Jersey have made inroads into limiting their
collective bargaining rights. Unions are intent in taking the whole pie,
not just a reasonable slice.
Local, state, and federal government union pension programs are on
the verge of bankruptcy because governments cannot continue to pay the
high salaries of the union workers and also support the high retirement
expenses that were negotiated under the duress of striking union
The simplest case in point is in the news today. The US Postal
Service is saying they will default some time before the end of the year
because they cannot make an upcoming 5.5 billion dollar retiree benefits
payment, and that they are expected to run out of money to pay workers
and other expenses early next year.
Today union workers are consistently paid higher salaries than their
counterparts in the private sector, plus they have medical and
retirement programs that private sector workers can only dream of.
Every labor rock you can turn over sheds light on excessive salaries
and pensions for union workers in all fields: education, law
enforcement, automotive, and on and on and on.
This has got to stop! Eventually the excessive cost of labor,
combined with government over spending, will bankrupt this once great
nation; and then no one will have anything. Kill the golden goose and
there will be no more precious golden eggs.
It’s time for real change in the level of power we give to unions and
to government. This is not an easy task, since most liberal Democrat
campaigns and coffers are funded by union dollars.
It’s time to shine a light on the issue, say enough is enough, and
speak up in the public forum any and every way you can.
Liberal Democrat Incivility
Posted September 7, 2011
’Tis the season for political rhetoric to be ramped up, and for
liberal Democrats to say all manner of vile expletives about their
opponents, such as businesses, Republicans, and the Tea Party.
Just last week Jimmy Hoffa Jr., Teamsters President, made a number of
these statements, saying that businesses are unpatriotic, declaring war
on conservative Republicans, and assuring Obama that union workers are
his “army” in the “war” against the Tea Party; saying, “we are ready to
Hoffa then went on to say, “Everybody here’s got a vote. If we go
back and we keep an eye on the prize – let’s take these sons of bitches
out and give America back to an America where we belong.”
Hoffa also said “You can’t be reasonable with people that are
unreasonable,” speaking of conservative Republicans, and “This group
(the tea party) is coming after them. You know, when they start talking
about, you know, getting rid of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid,
rolling back collective bargaining in major states.”
So what is it about Hoffa and the paranoid liberal Democrats that
make them think everyone is out to get them? Maybe they’re not paranoid!
Maybe the American people just don’t appreciate their tactics of
They make the discussion very personal. They attack the character and
personal values of the people they disagree with, rather than argue the
merits of the facts being discussed.
I will say that Hoffa and the liberal Democrats are in good company;
these are the same political tactics used by Thomas Jefferson and his
party followers when discussing the merits of the Constitution and the
merits of the newly formed government. Jefferson, as does Hoffa,
resorted to calumnious arguments that sought to tear down the integrity
and credibility of the individuals they disagreed with.
In my view these calumnies are used to obfuscate their real
intentions, which is to ignore arguing facts they neither believe in nor
care about. We have to look past the facts in play, and try to discern
the real issue.
In Hoffa’s case, it’s not about businesses, Republicans, the Tea
Party, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or anything like that. It’s
about loosing their collective bargaining rights, and therefore, loosing
out on their larger than reasonable salaries, benefits, and pensions.
He doesn’t care about you and me; he only cares about himself and his
union members. He doesn’t even care about who is nominated and elected
president, as long as whoever it is supports his rapacious union
Once upon a time unions were good for this country, and the right
forum for under appreciated, under paid, and over worked employees to
make sure they received a fair shake. But today the unions have replaced
the powerful, oppressive, and greedy employers which they were
originally fighting against.
It’s time to draw the line on excessive union greed, whether in the
public or the private sector. It’s time to rebalance the collective
bargaining field with regulations and restriction on what the unions can
and cannot do in their quest for all the money they can get, to the
detriment of the consumer, the taxpayer, and the country.
It’s time to let them know we care about the plight of our once great
nation, as well as the plight of the employee, and that we are willing
to fight for America to be great once again. It’s time to let them know
we will not let them continue to drag down our country with their
rapaciousness and calumny.
It’s time to let your Representatives and Senators know you do not
want the unions to be allowed to bully companies and governments into
collective bargaining agreements we can no longer afford.
It’s time to speak up in the public forum any and every way you can.
The Politics of Debate
Posted September 8, 2011
Last night’s debate, in my estimation, left a lot to be desired; but
then I don’t have any appreciation for the artificial environment of the
debate format, where the liberal media asks dumb questions designed to
create “gotcha” sound bites for the next day’s tabloids and blogs, and
the candidates spar against each other and against Obama without time to
discuss anything of substance.
Don’t get me wrong! Thinking fast on your feet and interesting
repartee are great qualities to have. But how good a judge of someone’s
abilities to lead the country out of economic crisis can they be? The
only time a sitting president gets to use these attributes is when
facing down the media; not when solving difficult problems facing our
Just remember, great sound bites and a commanding media presence are
the same qualities that catapulted Obama into office. Never once did the
national discussion even get close to his experience in dealing with
complex issues. Oh, he was clear that he too could answer the call that
came in at 3 AM, but no one ever asked him how he would handle the
crisis, step by step, in detail.
Romney and Perry appear to be the two front runners in the polling
and the debating, each with experience we can talk about.
Romney, as Governor of Massachusetts, is best known as a moderate
Republican who brought us RomneyCare and poor job creation performance.
He has also stated he is for global warming, believing it to be a real
threat to humanity, he is pro-choice, unwilling to sign the pro-life
pledge, and he was unwilling to fight the Massachusetts legislature over
RomneyCare, rolling over to sign what he said was a bad bill because of
Perry, as Governor of Texas, is best known as a true conservative
Republican who created a sound environment for Texas to become the best
job creating state in the nation. He has also shown that he can be tough
on border issues, stating he is for protecting our borders before
beginning to deal with illegal immigration, he is against global
warming, thinking it to be a phony mess, and he is pro-life, backing a
constitutional amendment banning abortion and signing the pro-life
Perry also has his issues, though, which were not dealt with at all
well, like his HPV vaccine mandate and allowing drug cartels to control
some parts of southern Texas.
Of the two, however, Perry appears to be tougher on the issues he has
dealt with, even if not everyone would agree with his decisions; and
Romney appears to cave when the political going gets tough.
Compared to Obama, who is great with the teleprompter and the sound
bites, either Romney or Perry would be a better choice, especially if
Romney had a Republican majority in the House and the Senate to prod him
politically to do the right thing.
Tonight Obama will present his idea of a jobs plan to the nation,
which will be a simple regurgitation of his same old ideas. His primary
platform will be to spend money we do not have in order to hope for new
jobs being created, for a change. However, Obama’s track record has been
abysmal in this regard; after spending trillions of dollars,
unemployment continues to remain high and the economy is sputtering as
it runs out of gas.
I don’t know about you, but I am hoping for a change. At this point
Perry looks like our strongest candidate to turn around the country’s
slide into oblivion; I think Romney will just be another RINO version of
Obama; and we are underestimating, for whatever reasons, Cain and
We need someone who is willing to fight for lower taxes, lower
spending, less regulations, smaller government, and no debt in ten
years. Is Perry the one who can meet this challenge head on?
Make your views known. Speak up in the public forum any and every way
Obama’s American Jobs Act
Posted September 10, 2011
Thursday night Obama spoke before a joint session of Congress and via
television to the American people about his American Jobs Act, where he
talked about the economic issues facing our once great country, took no
responsibility for any involvement in the conditions that have brought
us to this crisis, and gave no solutions of substance for turning it
Obama’s big proposal that had to be made before a joint session of
Congress, an event typically reserved for war, is to continue spending
money we don’t have with the possibility of creating short term jobs
that may or may not even begin to fix the longer term unemployment
He also wants to increase taxes on the rich because they don’t
already give their fair share, to incentivize new hiring by businesses
with targeted tax credits, to increase spending on schools, highways,
and bridges, to give more bailout money to the states, and to spend 450
billion dollars we don’t have.
But don’t worry! Obama’s plan will not cost us one more dime, because
he will cover the increased spending by pushing off the responsibility
of the cost to the debt super committee. All they have to do is figure
out a way to reduce the debt by another 450 billion dollars. Of course,
Obama forgot to mention that this debt super committee could just as
easily increase taxes as cut spending.
So the bottom line is that Obama’s American Jobs Act is more of the
same old rhetoric that we have grown to expect from him, without any
detail to even begin to know how he will attempt to deliver on his
promise of increasing jobs in a struggling American economy.
Obama just doesn’t get it. He has no clue. He’s no FDR, JFK, or even
LBJ! Although I’m sure he sees himself as a great president like they
were in his own mind’s eye.
What Obama doesn’t even begin to realize is that he has made Bush’s
economic incompetence much worse by heaping more spending, more
regulation, and more debt on the American people than any other
president in history.
For example, our debt ceiling grew 5.4 trillion dollars over eight
years under Bush and 5.5 trillion dollars over three years under Obama;
in addition, our deficit has grown to a whapping 1.5 trillion dollars a
year under Obama, the biggest ever; and increased regulations are
bringing small and large business growth to a crawl, if not a
All this economic uncertainty is what’s stifling private sector job
creation, so subsidizing public jobs with money taken from businesses
and individuals will not even begin to create any real job growth for
the American people.
What we do need is real change in how the Obama administration
addresses the economic and unemployment issues facing our once great
country, not a campaign speech made before a joint session of Congress
masquerading as a substantial solution to all our economic woes.
We need to hope that one of our conservative Republican candidates
for president will change the political landscape with real solutions to
It’s time to take back America for all the hurting people who are out
of work, for all the hurting businesses that are sinking under the
weight of regulations, and for all the hurting retirees who are watching
their retirement dollars shrink down to insignificance.
It’s time to take back America from Obama and his minions who want to
add more stimulus spending cronyism, more quantitative easing money
printing, more taxes on the rich, more regulations on businesses, and
much more debt.
Why don’t they ever consider cutting real spending by some
percentage, say 25%, across the board, except for Social Security and
Medicare retirees and except for the military? Everything else is just
pork barrel spending on pet projects, programs, and countries.
It’s time to tell your Representatives and Senators to cut real
spending now. It’s time to speak up in the public forum any and every
way you can.
Posted September 11, 2011
America remembers with a moment of silence at 8:45 AM ET, when
American Flight 11 hit the North Tower of the World Trade Center. At
this point, we just thought that there was a tragic accident, or an
aircraft malfunction, that caused Flight 11 to slam into the North
Tower. No one knew what was yet to come as this tragic day of Islamic
terror would unfold.
America remembers with a moment of silence at 9:03 AM ET, when United
Flight 175 slammed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center in
view of all the cameras and people on the ground.
This is the moment when everyone watching the events play out
realized that this is no accident or aircraft malfunction. This is the
moment when we all realized that the United States of America was under
attack from unknown terrorists. This is the moment in history that
transformed a mediocre Bush presidency into an historic battle for the
survival of our Judeo-Christian culture over the seventh century Islamic
way of life.
Even though many Americans have grown complacent, the battle still
rages today, mostly unseen by Western eyes, asleep until the next
surprise attack, when we least expect it.
America remembers with a moment of silence at 9:40 AM ET, when
American Flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon in Washington DC.
This is the moment when shock and disbelief rolled quickly across the
nation; the moment when everyone asked themselves ‘Where will the next
target be, and when?’ Even though all flights had already been grounded
nationwide, it still took some time to get them on the ground; and any
one of them could have been the next human guided missile to attack any
one of our cities.
America remembers with a moment of silence at 9:59 AM ET, when the
unthinkable happened, the South Tower of the World Trade Center
collapsed into a heap of rubble and human carnage. It took just 56
minutes for the heat from the burning jet fuel to melt the steel girders
to the point of collapse, when they could no longer withstand the weight
of the upper floors.
America remembers with a moment of silence at 10:03 AM ET, when
United Flight 93 was brought down by a passenger revolt against the
terrorists in an empty field outside of Shanksville PA.
The brave passengers had already heard, via phone, of the NY and DC
terror attacks, and they were determined not to let their plane be used
as a missile against another DC target. Knowing they were bound to die
in DC, they decided to sacrifice their own lives in PA to save the lives
of countless others.
America remembers with a moment of silence at 10:28 AM ET, when the
unthinkable happened a second time, the North Tower of the World Trade
Center collapsed into a heap of rubble and human carnage.
The shock and horror of the day’s events left everyone both dazed
from and united against the still unknown terrorists who would
perpetrate such evil against our country.
Our hearts were poured out in support for the families and loved ones
of the 2,977 Americans who lost their lives on that fateful day; 411 of
which were emergency workers trying to get others to safety. And our
anger was stirred against the 19 al-Qaeda terrorists who perpetrated
this evil; 15 Saudis, 2 from the UAE, 1 Egyptian, and 1 Lebanese.
The American people remained united for some time against the evil
that chose to show its ugly face in our country. But this only lasted
until the next election cycle, when we went back to politics as usual.
So, what have we learned over these last ten years? Anything of
We still disagree vehemently over whether or not we are at war, and
with whom we might be at war. Are we at war with Islamic terrorists,
with al-Qaeda, with Iraq, with Afghanistan, or just with evil people who
hate us because we are American?
One thing I know is that, whether or not we believe we are at war,
radical Islam is at war with us. They hate us because we are infidels
and do not follow Islam; and the Qur’an teaches them that it is ok to
This is very difficult for the American mind to understand, since it
is ingrained in our American culture to try to get along with everyone,
to look past the differences to see our common humanity. It is our
Judeo-Christian culture that teaches us to love our enemy, to get along
with everyone, to turn the other cheek, and to forgive seven times
We must remain vigilant against these terrorists who want to destroy
our country and kill all Americans. This day, of all days, should remind
us that we must not be slack in the area of defense and military
spending. We must continue to stand the watch, prepared to defend
ourselves against attack.
Today is a great day to remind your Representatives and Senators that
we need to remain vigilant against terror attacks on our soil, that we
need to keep our defense and military funded to do the job we depend on
them to do.
Today is a great day to speak up in the public forum any and every
way you can.
The Debate Continues
Posted September 13, 2011
Last night’s Republican debate for the Presidential nomination was
lively and completely political, with each candidate showing off his or
her political prowess and credentials while under the spotlight.
Perry was under attack from the seven other candidates even more than
Obama, as some of his past decisions as governor and statements as
candidate came under intense fire. Can anyone of us, however, say with a
straight face that we have never made any bad decisions or made any
ridiculously sounding statements, ones we would go back and change if we
We all make the best decisions we can at the time, using all the
information we have at our disposal. But sometimes we don’t get it
right. A mature individual admits the mistake, learns from it, and moves
on, probably never to make that same mistake again, but certain to make
The best measure of a person’s character is not all the things they
do right, but how they respond to the things they do wrong. No one ever
learned anything but pride from things done right, but a person of
character takes responsibility for the things done wrong and becomes
wiser from the experience.
In my view Perry showed his true character under fire last night. He
admitted his HPV mandate was handled incorrectly even though he thought
at the time, given the data he had, that it was the best decision for
the safety of young women. With grace under fire, Perry, softly spoken,
said that any family that didn’t want to have the vaccine could opt out.
This means that not one young woman received the vaccine who did not
Perry’s statements and experience, as expressed in the debate, gave
us a glimpse into his character as an individual. He called Social
Security what it is, a Ponzi scheme. According to Merriam-Webster a
Ponzi scheme is “an investment swindle in which some early investors are
paid off with money put up by later ones in order to encourage more and
bigger risks.” This sounds like Social Security to me!
Perry’s experience as governor of Texas helped create a business
environment that allowed private sector jobs to increase in a down
economy. Texas is now a state in which people and businesses are moving
to in significant numbers.
Border security is another issue Perry knows first hand; and while I
may not agree with his approach of feet on the ground verses a fence,
I’d like to hear more of his reasoning behind his position so I might
better understand the issue from his perspective as governor of the
largest border state in America.
Last night Perry showed us the man behind the political mask. All we
need to do is look clearly, with unbiased glasses, to see how he will
lead this once great country back on the road toward prosperity.
Romney is the best political debater of the group, by far; everyone
agrees, and so do I. But all we saw last night is the face Romney wanted
us to see, his political persona. To me he is a slick, polished
politician who says all the right things at precisely the right time.
Although, he did seem to be a little off his game last night. Maybe he
was trying too hard to get back into the number one position.
Romney continues to find creative ways to distance himself from
RomneyCare, which is socialized medicine Massachusetts style. This type
of rose by any other name would still stink just as bad.
Romney believes in a fair tax, which is a national sales tax, also
known as a value-added tax, which to me is one of the most dangerous new
ways to tax people that could ever be proposed. What makes you think
that the federal income tax will go away when the federal sales tax is
What it does is provide another method for wringing tax dollars out
of the lower and middle classes. Even if the combined income tax and
fair tax is initially lower than current tax rates, over time both will
creep back up, as they did in Great Britain, so the combined total will
eventually impose a staggering tax burden on the American people.
This is the same idea as Cain’s 9-9-9 plan, which is just as
dangerous to the long term economic health of our once great country.
To finish up with Romney, he is too slick a politician for us to
discern how he will lead as president. His past behavior speaks as a
RINO, a Republican in name only, who is at best socially liberal and at
worst fiscally liberal as well; but his current political discourse
makes him sound conservative.
I believe his past performance is the real man behind the political
mask; and if elected will definitely disappoint us all.
Cain is a good speaker, a likeable man, and a very savvy businessman
with lots of experience. But is he a political animal who can survive in
the political arena? Without any real political experience I think he
will be rendered ineffective by the Washington machine. A good man who I
would love to get to know personally, but not at all presidential
Bachmann was a strong speaker, with a very good command of the facts,
especially related to taxes, ObamaCare, and illegal immigration. She was
aggressive and feisty last night, which elevated her significantly, in
She took charge and instigated the Perry beat down on his HPV
decision, not willing to let go until many of the others jumped onto the
pile, even if her facts were wrong. She could be up there with Perry, in
my book, with a little more seasoning and a priority on integrity.
Gingrich is also a good speaker, with lots of good ideas about Social
Security, Medicare, Medicaid, government accountability, and who really
creates jobs, the private sector. However, his track record of follow
through from idea to working program leaves a lot to be desired. He
would, however, make a great chief of staff or political advisor for
whoever does get elected.
Santorum did ok last night, but didn’t shine. He was good at body
slamming Perry on HPV and Paul on his view of 9/11 responsibility, but
his ideas about Social Security are antiquated. In my view, Santorum
should save his backer’s money and drop out. His support for the
eventual winner could ensure him a seat at the big boys table in the
Huntsman made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. There was
something about what he said and the way he said it that made me want to
play solitaire on my computer when he spoke.
Paul is out of touch with reality, thinking that 9/11 was our fault,
and not the responsibility of radical Islamic terrorists. If he cannot
distinguish between good and evil intentions, how will he ever navigate
the political maze called Washington DC?
CNN and Wolf Blitzer get a lot of credit for hosting and moderating a
good strong debate, and helping ensure that each candidate received
their share of the spotlight.
Last, but certainly not least, the Tea Party has earned the respect
and acceptance by the mainstream media to be a credible co-host with CNN
in a great debate of ideas and ideologies.
The American people can now begin to better understand the
personalities and experience of the eight candidates running for the
Republican nomination for president.
A President Of, By, and For Illegals
Posted September 16, 2011
US Representative Luis Gutierrez, a Democrat from Illinois, Obama’s home
state, thanked and praised Obama for illegally bypassing Congress in his new ICE
DHS directive not to deport any illegal alien unless they are a national
security concern, have a serious criminal history, are a threat to public
safety, are a human rights violator, or are involved in serious immigration
Congress tried to pass the DREAM Act last December, but it was voted down. So
there is no US law on the books that allows Obama to unilaterally make this de
facto US policy on his own. In fact, it is a direct violation of Title 8 Section
1325 of the US Code, which makes it a federal crime to be in the United States
Therefore, Obama, ICE, and DHS are all guilty of aiding and abetting federal
fugitives in violation of Title 8 Section 1325 of the US Code. Maybe even
Gutierrez and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus are also responsible in some way
for violating US law.
But we cannot stop there, most of, if not all, the states are also guilty of
violating US immigration law by turning a blind eye to illegal immigrants,
allowing them to have driver’s licenses or identification cards, allowing them
to attend state colleges at in-state rates, and on and on and on.
What is this once great country doing? Are federal and state employees and
politicians pimping for the Hispanic vote? Why are they so willing to violate US
law when we the people have spoken over and over again, saying with our votes
that we do not want the DREAM Act or amnesty in any way, shape, or form?
We need to defend the laws of the land, and hold its violators accountable!
Starting with Obama and those in his administration’s departments, who operate
under his directives even when they know they violate US law.
We need to throw Obama’s sorry excuse for and American president out of
office as soon as we can. Because every day he is in office he finds new ways to
slap the American people in the face, like with his illegal illegal immigration
Good, hard working Americans are having trouble getting jobs all around this
country, while illegal immigrants are able to steal the jobs right out from
under them. Every employer who is found to have hired an illegal immigrant
should be given one month and then fined unmercifully for every illegal still
working until this cancer is cut out of our body politic.
We cannot survive as a nation, great or otherwise, if our politicians do not
follow and uphold the laws of the land. And if we do not speak up, then we too
are responsible for the looming disaster as well.
Contact your Representatives and Senators to tell them you have had enough
with our politicians violating US law, specifically with regard to illegal
immigrants stealing American jobs.
Call for Obama’s impeachment now! Speak up in the public forum any and every
way you can.
Taxes, Taxes, and More Taxes
Posted September 19, 2011
Back in July and early August, when the debt ceiling debate raged
across the country, conservatives from coast to coast were asking House
and Senate Republicans, especially Boehner and McConnell, to hold the
line by not raising the debt limit.
The fear then held by the old guard Republicans, and apparently
supported by Tea Party Republicans as well, was that not raising the
debt ceiling would cause the US credit rating to drop. Well, they went
ahead and raised the debt ceiling against the people’s wishes, and they
were wrong! The US credit rating was still lowered from AAA to AA+.
Maybe the politicians really didn’t know what they were doing. Go
When the debt super committee was formed by the debt ceiling
legislation, the Boehner and McConnell talking points were how this is
the best way to cut spending and reduce the deficit for future
Well, now Obama’s solution will be unveiled, most likely today, and
once again the Republicans in the House and Senate were hoodwinked by
the Democrats. Obama will ask for 1.5 trillion dollars in tax hikes,
with some offsetting entitlement and defense cuts. All this was very
This is playing out just as many conservatives across this once great
nation have said. Spending cuts are being ignored as too risky, or too
political, in favor of tax increases on an already hurting economy.
It is unconscionable to raise taxes when August unemployment
applications rose to the highest level in a long time, when August
foreclosures also rose dramatically and will now continue high into the
foreseeable future, and when the number of people living in poverty has
risen to 46.2 million, the highest level ever.
In my opinion, Boehner, McConnell, and the Congressional Republicans
are either political idiots, spineless wimps, or clever ideologues who
also want to see the economic destruction of our once great country
along with the Democrats.
Which is it?
It’s time for we the people to get angry at the way we are
being ignored by the political elite on the left and the right,
including all the Tea Party supported politicians. Once elected by the
people, politicians do what they want, not what the people who elected
them have asked for. They all make promises that they all break. I guess
politics and integrity are mutually exclusive!
It’s time for we the people to speak up loudly and often
against any new tax increases, and to vow that any Republican who votes
for a tax increase will be replaced in their next primary election by a
conservative who will hold the line on taxes and regulations.
It’s time to elect people who do what they promise once in office, or
throw them out the next time around. If we the people allow this
new tax bill to go into effect without a fight, we deserve the economic
destruction we will get.
We know Congress has a terrible track record of spending all
taxes raised, of putting off fixing problems until the people get angry
enough, and of promising one thing and doing another.
It’s time to get angry! It’s time to contact your Representatives and
Senators to tell them to vote against any new tax legislation, or we
will vote against them in their next primary election.
It’s time to stand tall and speak out in the public forum any and
every way you can.
The time for battle is now! Use your rights or lose your rights
The Fall of America
Posted September 20, 2011
It has been 20 years since the fall of the Soviet Union. According to
Wikipedia “Due to the
years of Soviet military buildup at the expense of domestic development,
economic growth stagnated. Failed attempts at reform, a standstill
economy, and the success of the Directorate for Inter-Services
Intelligence against the Soviet Union’s forces in the war in Afghanistan
led to a general feeling of discontent.”
Stagnant growth, failed attempts at reform, and spending money they
did not have in all the wrong places brought on a feeling of discontent,
which led to a weakening of the central government.
Does any of this sound familiar?
America appears to be heading in the same direction. Obama and the
Democrats continue to strangle the economy and families financially
through heavy taxation, incessant fees, and excessive regulations.
The Republicans, including those supported by the Tea Party, are no
better, since they will not stand up to Obama and the Democrats,
portraying themselves as spineless wimps, unable or unwilling to fight
for the rights and prosperity of the American people.
We must fight our own battles; not depending on duplicitous
Now Obama wants to pile on another 1.5 trillion dollars in taxes and
fees, in his feeble attempt to lower the debt by more than 3 trillion
dollars over the next ten years. I’ll bet the 3 trillion in savings
includes the cutting of future spending projections in Iraq,
Afghanistan, and our own defense.
What Obama failed to tell us is that there are no cuts to the current
spending levels, so that the only way he can reduce the debt completely
is to raise taxes by another 14 trillion dollars, assuming he doesn’t
need to spend our money on any unforeseen programs, project, liberal
causes, or wars.
When will we the people wake up and smell the dung shoveled out by
Obama and the Democrats?
We will never get this once great nation back to financial health and
full employment by continuing to tax our workers into the poor house.
When will Obama and the liberal Democrats get it? When will the
Republicans get it, and be willing to fight for it?
Unless we the people get in the faces of our Representatives and
Senators now, they will never change. We need to rock their political
boats so they know we are serious about wanting economic security now.
You can use TheTeaParty.net automated petition system to send one of
their canned messages to Obama and Congress, and you can add you own
comments to each message. Just click on this link:
If you can, I know they could use your donations as well.
You can also call, write, or email Obama and your Representatives and
Senators by going to their websites; they are easily accessible via the
Yahoo search engine.
Now is not the time for us to be timid or trusting in others. Now is
the time to speak up loudly and often in the public forum. Now is the
time for us to get in their faces with our conservative points of view.
If you and I don’t speak up, no one will do it for us.
How willing are you to fight for the rights granted to you by the
Constitution of the United States? If we don’t fight for our rights
today, we will lose them to the socialist ways of Obama and the liberal
It’s time to go to the mattresses! Even though we can’t see it, the
battle is raging all around us. It’s time to take up arms for today’s
battle: the written and spoken word of free speech in the public forum.
Congress Is Failing To Do Its Job
Posted September 27, 2011
We are currently in the third battle in Congress to prevent a
government shutdown this year; the first in April over the budget, the
second in July over the debt limit, and now the third over the budget,
The current battle is over FEMA funding in the latest continuing
resolution to fund the federal government. The House wants to fund FEMA
at 3.65 billion dollars with offsetting spending cuts, and the Senate
wants to fund FEMA at 6.9 billion dollars with no offsetting spending
cuts. Personally, I think they have all gone crazy with political power.
Congress is spending its time arguing over 3.25 billion dollars for
FEMA when the economic stability and security of our once great nation
is circling the drain.
The current national debt is over 14 trillion dollars, going to
almost 17 trillion dollars by the end of the year thanks to the debt
ceiling bill passed and signed by Obama in August. The proposed fiscal
2012 budget is projected at 3.7 trillion dollars, which is at least 1.5
trillion dollars more than taxes and fees raised, and has never
officially been passed by Congress and signed by Obama.
But don’t worry! The debt super committee will fix all the problems
by raising taxes on the hard working American people until it hurts so
bad we all scream, and thereby force more people out of work from
vanishing entrepreneurial investment dollars.
How high can Congress and Obama raise taxes and fees on the American
people before they drive enough people out of work so that they can
never collect enough from those left working, no matter how high they
make the taxes and fees?
I know! This is one of my dumb questions that some bureaucrat in some
federal department has spent his whole career studying. Does Obama,
Boehner, or Reid even understand the question?
Congress is an utter failure at their job!
Have they ever really read the Preamble to the Constitution?
It says “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more
perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide
for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Can we the people find true justice in America today? I know justice
is always skewed by the person dispensing it; it’s just human nature.
But I don’t think we even care about exhibiting the mere perception of
true justice any more. It’s all about personal and/or political gain.
Does our federal government even try to ensure domestic tranquility
any more? Today it’s about parties and ideologies, tranquility be
damned. This looming government shutdown is a good example. If our
politicians cared one whit about domestic tranquility they would have
passes a fiscal budget when they were supposed to, rather than forcing
these continuing resolutions every month or two.
Does our federal government provide for the common defense? Clearly
not when we allow our borders to be penetrated by illegals, and then
allow the illegals to stay in our country when they come to the
government’s attention. Our government now just looks the other way, or
as in the case of California and Texas makes it easy for them to stay
and steal jobs and college seats from hard working Americans.
Does our federal government promote the general welfare of its
citizens? Again, clearly not when our federal government is the cause of
our housing problems, of our unemployment problems, of our rapacious
debt problems, of our economic problems, of our national security
problems, and on and on and on.
Does our federal government do anything to secure the blessings of
liberty to ourselves and our posterity? Certainly not when our liberty
is being eroded daily by all the regulation imposed on us by the EPA,
NLRB, ICE, DHS, TSA, and others; and these regulations all bypass
Congressional oversight. In addition, they are destroying the liberty of
our posterity with their excessive debt pushed on to the backs of future
So, in my estimation, Congress, and Obama, are failing to do their
job, as outlined in the Preamble to the Constitution!
They need to stop their bickering and political posturing and work
together to solve our problems now.
Contact you Representatives and Senators to tell them to fix our
housing, unemployment, debt, economic, and illegal alien problems now,
and to force Obama to follow the law of the land rather than allowing
him to unilaterally ignore the laws of our land.
It’s time to speak up in the public forum any and every way you can.
The Right Candidates
Posted September 29, 2011
It must be a terrible feeling to know what’s right and not be able to
speak up because you are afraid of the left’s ability to lie
convincingly to the American people in order to blame the right for
their own incompetence and inability to fix the problems of our once
great nation. Calumny and political posturing trump the truth and doing
what’s right to fix problems.
But it seems that once a Republican gets elected to national office
they loose their ability to speak up honestly against the leftist
Democrats and their lying duplicity with the American people.
The good news is that the American people are finally starting to
wake up to Washington’s shenanigans.
According to a recent
Gallup poll of adult
Americans, “A record-high 81% of Americans are dissatisfied with the way
the country is being governed, adding to negativity that has been
building over the past 10 years.” These numbers break down to 65% of
Democrats and 92% of Republicans are dissatisfied with how the nation is
This poll also concluded that 82% of the American people are
dissatisfied with how Congress is doing its job of governing the
country; 69% have little or no confidence in the legislative branch; 57%
have little or no confidence in the federal government being able to
solve the domestic problems facing the country; 53% have little or no
confidence in the people who seek or hold public office; and 49% say
that the federal government poses an immediate threat to the rights and
freedoms of the American people.
It appears that the American people are significantly frustrated with
the way our currently elected government is doing its job, and with
those elected to the national stage. As far as I’m concerned, it’s about
time the American people realize that we the people are loosing
our freedoms and liberties at the hands of our elected government
But the real question now, for conservatives, is ‘will the Republican
presidential candidates be any different?’
Romney, not so much! His track record is too liberal for the nation,
even though in Massachusetts he appeared to be a moderate conservative.
Romney, like Obama, is too slick a speaker and debater; he thinks fast
on his feet and has all the right answers that the American people want
to hear at this time.
But Romney’s track record paints a different picture, showing him for
ObamaCare and RomneyCare, for pro-choice and not willing to sign the
pro-life pledge, for global warming and driving up the costs of
electricity and gasoline, and for the Boehner debt limit plan which
included tax hikes on the American people and businesses.
Herein stands Romney’s future performance. He’s willing to say
anything to get elected, but will go along to get along when tough
decisions are required. He’s a RINO (Republican in name only) version of
Obama, based on his track record.
Perry should be different, based on his track record as Governor of
Texas. He is a true conservative who had to make some tough decisions
relating to the quality of people’s lives.
His HPV decision was the right one to guarantee that everyone would
have access to the vaccine, and that anyone who didn’t want the vaccine
would be able to opt-out. In addition, his decision to allow children of
illegals to go to state schools at in-state tuition rates was a way of
not punishing the children for the sins of the parents; it’s not like
the children were a part of the decision to enter the US illegally, and
by going to college they get a chance to be productive members of the US
Perry’s track record is the picture of conservatism, showing he is
for protected borders using people and not fences in the process, he is
pro-life and signed the pro-life pledge, he thinks global warming is the
hoax it has been proven to be, he is for giving people the benefit of
the doubt in seeking entry into state colleges, he is against the
federal government taking over people’s health solutions with ObamaCare
because it will be a financial drain on the people and on state
governments, and he is willing to speak the truth about Social Security
when he says it is a Ponzi scheme, which it is according to the
Perry seems to line up, based on his track record, with conservative
values, and therefore is most likely to continue his conservative
performance into the Oval Office. If only he were able to think fast on
his feet and participate in the mindless banter that the media
identifies with as a good debater.
Cain is still a mystery when it comes to a conservative track record.
He has great experience as a business leader, but we all know that
solving business problems is very different from solving political
In business, as CEO or president, you solicit people’s advice on a
particular issue and then you have to decide on the course of action
yourself, sometimes picking from a number of good solutions offered by
your staff. However, it doesn’t work that way in the public sector, and
especially not in Washington. As president he doesn’t get to choose the
solution, just try to influence Congress on the best solution to vote on
Will Cain be able to meet this challenge as president? It would be
easier to answer this question if he had some public track record to
draw from, especially one as a state governor; but short of that, he
remains unproven until he serves in some public office. So, basically
it’s a crap shoot as to whether or not he would be a good conservative
president. Your guess is as good as mine.
Aside from his 9-9-9 plan, which is dangerous by introducing another
method of taxation, I have liked everything I’ve heard.
As for the remaining six contenders in the ring, their poll numbers
are low enough to disqualify them from mentioning at this time.
Please make your views known in the public forum any and every way
Posted October 3, 2011
Valerie Jarrett, a senior White House advisor, spoke about Obama’s
American Jobs Act to an Episcopal group in Washington D.C. on September
21, 2011. In her speech were some very telling statements about Obama’s,
and the liberal, view on how to fight poverty in America.
She said, “We have to give people a livelihood so that they can
provide for their families”, and “We are working hard to lift people out
of poverty and give them a better life, and a footing, and that’s what
government is suppose to do”.
Herein lies the fundamental difference between liberals and
conservatives. How should we as a compassionate people help our friends
and neighbors living in poverty and in need of help?
The liberal way is to take money from the “rich”, which in their
definition includes the middle class and every small business in
America, and give it to anyone who is willing to sign up for the
government’s free give-away program, never really weeding out the
The whole purpose of this liberal approach is to keep handing out
money so that the recipients will remain dependent on the liberal
“generosity” with other people’s money, and will therefore vote to keep
the liberals in political power so that the handouts will continue
Have you ever noticed how liberals are so very generous with other
people’s money, and not with their own? Many studies over the years have
shown how little of their own money they contribute to charities,
especially as compared with conservatives.
The sad thing is, the biggest losers in this whole debacle are those
in poverty and in need, since the liberal programs are designed to keep
those who are most vulnerable dependent on the handouts.
The liberals want to look magnanimous by taking fish from those who
caught them and give them to those who need them, never ever wanting to
teach those in need how to fish for themselves.
But I contend that it is not the government’s responsibility to help
those in need, just like it is not the government’s responsibility to
create jobs. It is the God given responsibility of individuals,
families, churches, and communities to help those going through
difficult times, whatever the need.
Only those close to the people in need are best equipped to know how
to respond, and how to help them get out of the difficult situation.
Only the ones close to the situation are in a position to assess the
true need, be it food, clothes, shelter, work, financial help, etc.; and
only the ones close to the situation have other local resources to draw
I believe the best way to address the needs of those in poverty is at
the community level, where local community ministries and church groups
can get to know the people they are helping first hand, and can build
personal relationships with them, and can marshal additional resources
to help the people get back on their own two feet.
Conservatives believe it is not the responsibility of government to
help those in need or to create jobs; that it is the responsibility of
government to empower individuals, businesses, and ministries to help
others and to create jobs. Government should get out of the way and let
people in the local communities do what they can do best, help get
others back on their feet so they can help themselves, and others.
It’s time for us all to speak up about the true role of government in
the lives of the people. It’s time to get government out of meddling in
people’s lives, and back to the original intention of the Constitution.
Make your views known! Please speak up in the public forum.
Tax and Spend Recovery
Posted October 6, 2011
Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader, doesn’t like Obama’s American
Jobs Bill and therefore won’t let it come to the floor of the Senate for
a vote. You might think this is a good thing, and that you heard the
last of Obama’s bill, nicknamed Stimulus 2. But, you’d be wrong!
Reid is delaying introducing the bill for an up or down vote because
he knows he doesn’t have the votes to pass it, even in a Democrat
controlled Senate; so he’s delaying to give himself time to rewrite the
bill in a way that will be more palatable to his Democrat colleagues.
He is adding sufficient taxes to the bill in order to cover the
entire 447 billion dollars without any needed spending cuts. Clearly he
doesn’t even trust the debt super committee to get it right, according
to his Democrat tax and spend ideology.
Reid wants to add a 5% tax surcharge on “millionaires” in order to
pay for the stimulus, making it the great American job killing bill.
This adds to the taxes already in the bill on families making more that
250 thousand dollars, and additional taxes on the oil and gas industry.
The stated reason for the bill was to fund job creation by the
federal government in an attempt to stimulate an already depressed and
Of course the real reason for the bill was to make it appear as
though Obama cared about the real economic woes of the American people,
and was trying to do something to help them get out of the economic hole
in which they find themselves.
However, no economist was willing to stand up and say that this bill
would actually help Americans get jobs; in fact, many said it would not
The bill is a liberal Democrat tax and spend hoax perpetrated on the
American people by an uncaring federal government at a time when they
need the government’s help the most.
But the truth of the matter is that government cannot help. All
government can do is get in the way of real recovery. And the current
Obama administration and Congress are experts at doing this!
They tell the American people that they are introducing legislation
or regulations that will definitely help get us out of the economic
doldrums we find ourselves in; but in reality their solutions only get
us deeper into debt and economic chaos.
Are they lying to the American people or do they really think that
their ideological solutions will help?
If you are like me and believe they are truly lying to the American
people, then you have to ask yourself ‘why would they do this?’ ‘Why
would they want to keep the American people so economically depressed?’
The answer is one no one will like! I sure don’t.
Their playbook is the same one used by communists all around the
world for the past hundred years. The idea is that there is an elite
ruling class who knows better than the masses how to fix the problems of
the masses, when in fact all the ruling class does is better their own
social and economic positions by putting in place rules and regulations
that benefit themselves while oppressing the rest of society.
This is where we are headed if we the people do not stand up
and take back out once great country from them. Conservatives and
independents must unite to overthrow the tyrannical left entrenched in
the federal government. They are destroying our once great country; and
we are letting them do it.
So, what can we do? We have to want to effect real change, because it
will not be easy. We must be dedicated to taking back our country from
the progressive liberal communists. This will not happen over night!
First we need to focus on the upcoming 2012 elections. We need to
make sure we elect true conservatives for President and Representatives
We need to understand that Romney is about as liberal as one can get
and still call themselves a Republican with a straight face. Romney is
an Obama wolf in Republican sheep’s clothing. Just look at his track
record as governor of Massachusetts.
Cain is a great guy, but has no conservative political track record;
and his 9-9-9 plan proves he does not understand true conservative
thought. You don’t give the federal government a new way to tax the
people, like his national sales tax, which may be implemented in the
beginning with good intentions, but will not always be run by well
intentioned individuals. Imagine his national sales tax in the hands of
Obama, Reid, and Pelosi.
Gingrich is a great conservative thinker, but he has proven over and
over again that he cannot successfully implement his conservative ideas.
He would however make a great advisor to a conservative president.
Perry is a proven conservative leader with a good track record as
Texas governor; but he is incompetent at speaking about and defending
his ideas and record on the national stage. So far he only shows himself
as a liability to a conservative ticket in 2012.
Now Christie and Palin are out of consideration, due to their own
choosing, and none of the other current candidates stand a snowball’s
chance in hell of getting elected. So, where does that leave us?
We need a new, bright, proven conservative to step into the current
political race. Who will that be? Does anyone have any ideas? The search
for our next President continues!
Now is the time for all true conservatives across this great land of
America to stand up and be counted. Now is the time we the people
need you to speak up in the public forum and make your views heard
What’s Your Dream?
Posted October 14, 2011
Yesterday Senate Republicans introduced the
Jobs Through Growth Act,
sponsored by Senators John McCain, Rand Paul, and Rob Portman. The press
release said “This legislation reforms the tax code, cuts spending and
reigns in overregulation to help foster an environment in which the
private sector can grow, invest and create jobs in America again.”
Here are the Senator’s quotes from the press release.
“We Republicans understand that it’s a growing, dynamic private
sector that creates quality jobs for the long term and real prosperity
in America, not government spending,” said Senator John McCain. “The
Jobs Through Growth Act will help give the certainty and confidence that
our private sector so badly needs to invest, grow and create jobs again.
By cutting taxes, reforming our broken tax code, reducing spending and
getting the burden of overregulation off America’s back we can get our
economy moving again.”
“The President’s jobs plan was voted down this week by members of
both parties,” said Senator Rand Paul. “We simply cannot look to the
failed policies of the last two years for an example of how to grow our
economy and create jobs. More government spending and excessive
regulation are the problem not the solution. We have spent too long
increasing the tax and regulatory burdens on job creators, instead of
allowing them to operate more freely and create more jobs.”
“This is a pro-growth proposal to create the environment for jobs
that stands in contrast to the short-term sweetener approach of the
Obama Administration, an approach that simply hasn’t worked,” said
Senator Rob Portman. “We need to address this problem in a way that
actually puts people back to work by solving some of the structural
problems in our economy. That means we need to reform our tax code,
provide regulatory relief to our small businesses and do something to
ensure that job creators have an incentive to invest and grow jobs. This
proposal, if enacted on a bipartisan basis, will help our economy get
back on its feet.”
In this bill the Republican Senators are consolidating all of the job
creating legislation they have been working on throughout this year. It
includes a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, a line item
veto for the President, tax reform that would cap individual and
corporate rates at 25%, tax incentives for businesses to move jobs back
to the US from abroad, withholding tax relief for vendors, and
The regulatory reform includes repealing the ObamaCare healthcare
destruction bill, reforming medical malpractice junk lawsuits based on
Texas’ law, repealing the Dodd-Frank financial takeover bill,
prohibiting any federal agency from issuing new regulations until the
unemployment rate is equal to or less than 7.7 percent (the unemployment
rate in January 2009), imposing restrictions on agencies like the EPA
and NLRB from trying to enact new regulations in the future, repealing
the President’s order requiring government-funded construction projects
to only use union labor, removing restrictions and regulations related
to oil and gas drilling and production, and many others.
Senate Republicans have now planted their flag for sweeping
legislation that will restore the ability of the private sector to
create jobs and repair our stagnating economy. This bill is a direct
counterpoint to Obama’s job-killing American Jobs Act, which will
continue the government’s out of control tax, spend, and regulate
policies that have been an abject failure throughout his administration.
However this Republican bill, just like the Obama bill, has no chance
of ever being passed by the Senate, because it is divided by ideological
politics. Republicans and Democrats will never agree because their
fundamental beliefs on how to fix the country’s economic woes are
The Democrats want to tax, spend, and regulate us into a socialist
nation run by a wealthy ruling class who knows what’s best for the rest
of the people; and the Republicans want government to get out of the way
of a free and vibrant economy where businesses have the financial
resources to create private sector jobs and personal wealth.
It’s the socialist dream versus the American dream! We need to decide
now which we want for ourselves, for our children, and for our
children’s children. Now, not later! So we can have an impact on who
gets elected a little over a year from now.
It’s not just about the Presidency; it’s about the House and the
Senate too! We need to break down the ideological walls in Congress so
we have people in office who are willing to enact legislation that will
allow the private sector to flourish so they can create jobs and
personal wealth again; and we need a President who will sign these job
creating bills, allowing them to become the law of the land.
What’s your dream? We need to decide now what we want a year from
now. Make your views heard in the public forum any and every way you
Action Required, Batteries Not Included
Posted October 19, 2011
While Obama is traveling around the country touting his American Jobs
Act, which was defeated by the Senate recently, he is making refuted
claims saying “we’re going to put teachers back in the classroom,
construction workers back to work rebuilding America, rebuilding our
schools, tax cuts for small businesses, tax cuts for hiring veterans,
tax cuts if you give your worker a raise.”
Obama’s plan was defeated by the Senate because even Democrat
Senators realized that it is nothing more than another stimulus spending
plan disguised as a jobs plan. I can only hope that even the Democrat
Senators are getting the message from the American people that they want
federal spending cut, not increased.
In addition to not telling the truth about his own plan, Obama is
also not telling the truth about the Republican jobs plan, saying their
plan is about “dirtier air, dirtier water, less people with health
insurance.” Anyone willing to read the bill, or read about the bill from
an unbiased writer, knows quickly that this is a bold face lie.
The Republican plan includes a balanced budget amendment to the
Constitution, a line item veto for the President, tax reform that would
cap individual and corporate rates at 25%, tax incentives for businesses
to move jobs back to the US from abroad, withholding tax relief for
vendors, regulatory reform of ObamaCare, and much more.
The Obama plan is about more taxes, more spending, and more
regulation, while the Republican plan is about less taxes, less
spending, and less regulation. Which do you want?
Give a politician a checkbook and he or she will continue to write
checks until the whole country is bankrupt. The only way to stop a
politician from spending is to take the checkbook away, or at least
provide restricted access to the checkbook and what can be done with it.
This is the idea behind the Republican plan. However, I don’t think
even the Republicans, and especially the Tea Party Representatives and
Senators, can be trusted with the checkbook. And they surely haven’t
honored their 2010 election commitments to cut spending by 38 billion
dollars in fiscal 2011.
Given this example of their lack of integrity to honor campaign
commitments in the short term, there is no chance that they will ever
honor their commitment to cut another 2.4 trillion dollars over the next
They are incapable of doing it from within the Washington political
machine. We the people need to enact legislation, like a balances
budget amendment, spending caps, and tax caps, in order to force them to
cut spending, cut taxes, cut regulations, cut the deficit, and cut the
Data released last week by the Treasury Department shows that there
have been no spending cuts whatsoever. In fact, spending has increased
to 3.6 trillion dollars for fiscal year 2011, the highest ever in US
In addition, for the first nine months of the year federal spending
was up 120 billion dollars over the same period the prior year; which is
an increase of almost 5%; and the deficit during this time period was
23.5 billion dollars higher.
These numbers are direct evidence that we the people have been
lied to by the Tea Party conservatives. They may have intended to cut
spending when they were campaigning; however they were unwilling to
follow through. No doubt the Washington political game is intoxication,
and they got caught up in the power of politics.
But now is the time for the Tea Partiers to get serious about meeting
their commitments to the American people. Now is the time for the Tea
Partiers to take the bull by the horns and force Congress into cutting
I’m in favor of shutting down the federal government if they cannot
pass legislation to cut spending, cut taxes, cut regulations, cut the
deficit, and cut the debt. Better the crisis now that we are in control
of, than the one that is coming that will indiscriminately destroy
everyone’s life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
If the Tea Partiers won’t do it, then we need to replace them as
It’s time to get serious about forcing change; it’s time to write
letters to your Representatives and Senators; it’s time to speak up in
the public forum; and it may even be time to take to the streets to make
our voices heard.
What are you waiting for?
Posted October 22, 2011
According to Senate Majority Leader Reid, private sector jobs are
doing just fine; it’s public sector jobs that have lost huge numbers. He
said this on the Senate floor while trying to get another 35 billion
dollars to bail out the states and public employee unions.
Reid will always ignore the facts in order to promote his biased
political ideology. He thinks nothing about lying to the American people
whenever it serves his leftist agenda. So, once again he is as far from
the truth as is humanly possible.
The truth is, as published by the BLS and IBD, all public sector
government jobs have dropped 1.75% since the down turn started in
December 2007, while private sector jobs have dropped three times as
much by 5.4%; and if we look at only federal government jobs, they have
actually risen by 2.29% over the same time period.
To put it in perspective, the public sector (federal, state, and
local governments) has lost 392 thousand jobs at the same time federal
jobs have increased by 63 thousand; however during the same period the
private sector has lost almost 6.3 million jobs.
That means that from the end of 2007 there have been 16 times more
private sector jobs lost than public sector jobs.
Reid wants the people to think that government jobs are suffering the
worst due to the draconian tax and spend cutting methodologies of the
right. However, as I pointed out in my October 19th post, the federal
government has actually increased spending in fiscal 2011, which ended
Along the same lines, Vice President Biden has recently made a
statement while trying to sell Obama’s jobs bill, claiming more people
would be raped and murdered if the bill failed to pass. His reason for
the increase in rapes and murders stems from the fact, as he tells it,
that states would be forced to lay off police officers.
Biden is also willing to ignore the facts and lie to the American
people in order to promote his biased political ideology. Like Reid,
Biden thinks nothing about lying to the American people whenever it
serves his political agenda.
Again, the facts speak loudly that the left lies to maintain their
According to the FBI’s uniform crime reports, the number of full time
law enforcement officers has dropped form 2008 through 2010 by 0.5%, and
during the same time period the number of rapes has dropped by 6.6% and
the number of murders has dropped by 10.4%.
It appears as though the number of rapes and murders isn’t even tied
to the number of police officers assigned to protect and defend the
American people. There are more complicated law enforcement dynamics at
play when trying to understand the effects of reducing the size of a
city’s police force on the number and type of crimes committed.
It’s clear, however, from the numbers that Reid and Biden have no
interest in the actual facts in any of the statements they make to the
American people. They are only interested in fabricating facts to
support their leftist political propaganda.
It’s time for the American people to call the leftist liars to
account for what the say in the public forum to promote their agenda.
It’s time for we the people tell them to stop their deceitful
lying in an attempt to hold on to political power. It’s time for we
the people to demand that our politicians tell us the correct facts
or else we will throw their sorry excuse for a human being out of office
the first chance we get.
It’s time for we the people to stand up for what is right, and
speak up in the public forum any and every way we can.
Perry’s Proposed Plan
Posted October 29, 2011
The Perry campaign introduced an economic plan recently, called
Cut, Balance, and Grow,
which states its purpose in the introduction: “By 2020, America must
have a tax code that is simple and fair; a federal budget that balances
without raising taxes; retirement and health care programs that are
sustainable and secure; a common-sense regulatory system that does not
create undue burdens on job creators; and a growing economy that allows
the best and brightest to create and innovate free from government
It is an ambitious plan, maybe too ambitious for Perry. In it they
point out that it will not happen overnight; it will take constant and
concerted effort to effect a long-lasting positive change in the way we
have been doing business.
I find it interesting that they put a goal end-date of 2020, which
would be precisely two terms for the next President elected.
I also find this plan to be an overwhelming challenge for Perry to
sell to the American people against a backdrop of plans proposed by other
Republicans, and the barrage of attacks from the current leftist
administration, Congress, and their mainstream media lackeys.
How can Perry defend this plan in the public forum effectively if he
cannot even defend his past actions while Governor of Texas. Perry
chokes in public debate. He’ll be chewed up and spit out by the polished
political machine of the left.
My advice to Mr. Perry is to start acting as if you are the
President, and the conservatives and independents will return to your
side in large numbers. But you have to be able to think fast on your
feet in public, and this will only happen if you are an expert on all
the facts you need to discuss your plan and your past.
It’s time for you to stop the whining and “oh poor me” attitude, Mr.
Perry, and do your homework; or drop out of the race now and go back to
Texas with your tail between your legs. Don’t waste the American
Back to the Perry plan. It proposes a flat tax of 20% on individuals
and businesses; it also includes individual deductions of $12,500 for
each individual and dependant, and deductions for mortgage interest,
charitable contributions, and state and local taxes. The unique element
of the Perry plan is to allow people to opt-in or continue to follow the
old tax code.
It doesn’t seem like the optional nature of the 20% flat tax would be
an advantage at first glance; however, it would allow me to do my taxes
both ways and then file the one that requires me to pay the least tax.
But it doesn’t seem like it would eliminate the compliance costs, the
cost of doing my taxes, that the plan states as one of its advantages.
The plan does, however, eliminate tax on Social Security benefits,
and unlike the Cain plan does not introduce a national sales tax or a
value-added tax. It also eliminates the tax on qualified dividends and
long term capital gains, the death tax, corporate loopholes and
special-interest tax breaks, and more.
The Perry plan proposes significant controls on the system of
regulations that are currently strangling businesses in America, saying
“the federal regulatory system has become a bureaucratic tool for
intimidation and a shadow system of taxation on American job creators.”
The plan proposes an immediate freeze on all pending and new
regulations, with exceptions available for those regulations “deemed by
the president to be routine or essential to American security.”
Every regulation enacted since the beginning of 2008 will be audited
according to these criteria: “is it affordable, is it effective, and
does it do more harm than its purported good?” Those regulations that
fail all three criteria will be repealed, those that pass all three
criteria will be left alone, and the rest will be rewritten.
Why only go back to 2008? Every regulation on the books should be
audited as a sign of good faith for the economic well-being and
prosperity of the American people.
All new regulations will have a sunset of seven years, forcing
Congress to vote for it again in order to keep it in place for another
seven years. This is a nightmare for Congress, since our Representatives
and Senators have shown a marked proclivity to not deal with difficult
issues, and a definite avoidance of long hours and hard work.
The Perry plan also proposes preserving Social Security, while adding
some options for younger workers, reforming Medicare and Medicaid,
repealing ObamaCare, repealing Dodd-Frank, asking for a balanced budget
amendment without raising taxes, capping federal spending to 18% of GDP,
reducing non-discretionary spending on a time table, and much more.
The Perry plan appears to be a good plan, similar in some ways to the
Jobs Through Growth Act
offered by McCain, et al, which is another good plan.
The ball is now in Perry’s court. It’s time for him to get tough and
aggressive in presenting and defending and then passing his plan. Get
tough or go home! There’s no other choice left for you Mr. Perry.
It’s time to speak up in the public forum any and every way you can.
Cain’s 9-9-9 Myth
Posted October 31, 2011
Herman Cain’s proposed
9-9-9 tax plan, limiting
individual taxes to 9%, business taxes to 9%, and imposing a national
sales tax of 9%, appears at first glance to be a real treat for the
Cain addresses some of the criticisms leveled at his plan in his
October 23rd weekly
commentary on his website, citing the Laffer curve as the
reason why future administrations and Congresses would not be willing to
raise any of his 9’s to a higher percentage.
In case you’re not familiar with the Laffer curve, Arthur Laffer is a
respected economist who codified the law of diminishing returns when it
comes to raising taxes and the resulting real tax dollars collected. He
postulated that at some point higher taxes would result in lower real
tax revenue dollars.
Cain’s defense of his plan against future increases to the
percentages is an erroneous one. He assumes that future presidents would
not allow any increases because they would understand and agree with
Laffer’s economics. However, Cain’s assumption and outcome expectation
is dangerous at best, and shows his inability to grasp basic political
mechanics, as proven by history.
Reagan, a true conservative, understood the Laffer principles and put
them into practice by lowering taxes and increasing tax revenue. He
called it supply side economics. However, Bush 41 and Clinton, after
seeing how well supply side economics worked under Reagan, went on to
raise taxes anyway. Both Bush 41, a Republican, and Clinton, a Democrat,
succumbed to political pressures and party ideologies, not to proven
economic principles, when it came to raising taxes.
What makes Cain believe that, if he is fortunate enough to get
elected and capable enough to get his 9-9-9 plan enacted, he will be
followed by presidents who are willing to hold the line on the
percentages just because it is supported by sound economic principles?
What makes him think that we will never have another president who is
driven by political pressures or party ideologies, or both?
This line of though alone proves to me that Cain in too politically
inexperienced and naïve to make a good president who understands what is
right and what will work politically in order to get this once great
country back on the road to economic growth and prosperity.
It’s time you wake up and smell the politics, Mr. Cain. It’s a dung
heap of self interests and political ideologies, few of which will ever
match your own.
In addition, Cain’s belief that a new national sales tax, or
consumption tax, will not be abused by future presidents and Congresses
also proves his political naivety, and shows off his inability or
unwillingness to look back at history and learn from it.
Any tax enacted by one president, with promises and rational reasons
why future president would not raise it, represents an out of control
crisis waiting to happen. Just look at the history of the original
income tax since it was enacted in 1913 by the Sixteenth Amendment to
the US Constitution. Political promises and inevitable reality never
Nowhere in his economic plan does Cain address the real issues facing
this country, which are out of control spending and the mounting public
debt. Cain also ignores the massive system of regulations that are
strangling American business, and keeping them from creating new jobs.
Cain may be currently polling first or second, but if elected his
political naivety and inexperience will prove to be a disaster for the
American economy, both in the short term and in the long term. His
business experience, while impressive, will not provide him the needed
experience to survive the political battlefield and institute economic
growth and prosperity for the American people.
It’s time to get real, Mr. Cain, and learn from the political past.
It’s time to put forth a comprehensive plan that addresses the real
problems facing the American people: excessive taxes, excessive
spending, excessive debt, excessive regulations, excessive government,
and rapacious politicians.
The real trick is getting it right for the American people.
It’s time to speak up in the public forum any and every way you can.
Love Your Neighbor
Posted November 2, 2011
Politico.com and the rest of the left-leaning media are pushing hard
to paint Herman Cain as one who uses his position and power to sexually
harass women in the workplace, just as the leftist propaganda machine
tried to do to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas during his
Is this just another symbolic lynching of a conservative black man by
the left, who claims to be the champion and defender of Blacks and
Hispanics in our country, or is there really a blazing fire beneath the
clouds of smoke?
Regardless of the outcome, don’t you think that Herman Cain deserves
the same “innocent until proven guilty” respect in the public forum as
was given to Bill Clinton, John Edwards, Edward Kennedy, and many more?
I am not condoning Cain’s behavior if he is guilty; neither am I
rushing to judgment if he is not. I believe the truth will always come
out in the end.
I may not agree with all of Cain’s political views and proposals, but
I do believe that we the American people should not assume the worst and
condemn anyone before all the facts are presented.
I believe he deserves the same treatment in the public forum as you
or I would want for ourselves. We all stand on or stumble over our own
Maybe we should let the one who is without sin and deceit in his or
her own life be the one to cast the first stone, and the rest of us
should just step back and quietly wait for the truth to make itself
Maybe this is the perfect time to be quiet and wait for the truth in
the public forum.
Posted November 5, 2011
As the November 23rd deadline for the debt super committee
gets closer, Boehner, Cantor, and the House Republicans are running
scared. You can tell, because they are now saying that they will
consider raising taxes to make the deadline.
When a politician says that they are considering something, you know
that have already decided to do it and are just floating the idea in
front of the American people to make sure the backlash won’t be too
If the debt super committee doesn’t come up with an agreed upon way
to trim the debt by at least 1.2 trillion dollars, then their political
stupidity will force huge cuts in defense and entitlement spending, as
their law mandates; and they know that the Democrats won’t agree to just
The political stupidity of their actions when forming the debt super
committee is clear. They told the American people that the super
committee would not raise taxes, and then sealed the deal with huge
mandatory cuts to defense and entitlement spending if they fail to come
to an agreement by the November deadline.
How stupid do the House Republicans think the American people are?
We the people knew from the beginning that they would never
just cut spending, since history has shown that Congress is incapable of
cutting back on spending, be it pork, entitlements, or any other
Our elected Congressional men and women are addicted to spending
money the American people do not have on programs and departments the
American people do not need. They are no better than crack addicts with
Where are the Tea Party members in the House? Why aren’t they
speaking up? They promised to cut spending without raising taxes in
order to get elected in 2010. I guess they are no better than any other
politician! Promise anything to get elected, and then do what you want
once in office.
How can they lie like that to their American conservative base? Do
they think we are idiots and won’t remember? Do they think we will not
hold them accountable?
It’s time for the House Republicans, and especially the Tea Party
members, to fight for what the American people want, and for what they
promised. It’s time to pony up and cut spending without raising taxes.
How many polls do they have to see where the American people say they
want the budget balanced and spending cut?
Congress is destroying America with their out of control tax and
It’s time for the American people to rise up and say “No more!” We,
the American people, want Congress to cut taxes, cut spending, cut
regulations, balance the budget, and cut the debt.
It’s time for the American people to speak up in the public forum any
and every way we can.
Feed the Monster!
Posted November 11, 2011
One week from today, on November 18th, funding for the US
Government will run out, based on the passage of the last continuing
resolution (CR), passed by Congress and signed by the President; and so
starts another Republican verses Democrat budget battle that will hold
the American people hostage at the hands of our very own government.
A government, I might point out, that is in violation of its own
rules since Obama has become President. Congress’ flagrant denial of due
process for the American people is outrageous, and unconstitutional.
The Republicans and the Democrats in the House and the Senate
continue to be unwilling to work on a fiscal budget as required by the
law of our land. They are all wimps because they do not want the
conflict caused by doing what’s right, so they settle for the next
continuing resolution that keeps the government running for a couple
But then I forget, it’s all about politics and not about doing what’s
required by law, or even about doing the right thing. The House, the
Senate, and even the Supreme Court are so politically divided that each
side would rather the country go down the tubes and the American people
become destitute and homeless than force an agreement on a full year
Certainly the left is getting what they want. The US will become a
third world country! But what is the right getting out of this
continuing standoff and caving scenario? And where is the Tea Party, the
self-appointed defender of the Constitution, in all of this?
We appear to be in a no-win cycle, where the American people are the
ones who get screwed; and the politicians all get rich. What ever
happened to the government that was of the people, by the people, and
for the people?
It’s clear from all the polls conducted over the last year that the
American people want the federal government to stop spending more than
they take in, to reduce the deficit, and to reduce the debt.
The only issue is that the American people are also divided on how to
do this. Some want only spending cut, some want only taxes raised, and
some want a mix of both; and some are taking the battle to the streets
in the “occupy” encampments and protests.
It reminds me of the 60’s, when the boomers took to the streets to
point out the ills of the country at the time. Then it was protests
against our evil government fighting a war in Viet Nam and against our
evil government’s secretive ways.
Today the battle is against our evil way of life, capitalism; and for
the bloated unions and for the bloated liberal government spending
machine’s beneficent handouts.
Where does the craziness end? Does it end in another civil war? Does
it end in the streets in a bloody battle between the left and the right,
between evil and good?
Is there even such a thing as evil verses good? Today, in our times
of moral relativism, everyone believes their side is good and the other
side is evil.
However, there is a moral rectitude that stands above all else, that
transcends this time and this place, that has been from the beginning
and will continue until the ending; and we will all be called to give an
So, what does this all mean? How do we apply what we know to what’s
the right thing to do?
Does this even apply to the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, the
Presidency, and how we govern our once great nation?
I believe it does!
I believe it’s time to draw a line in the sand. It’s time to decide
where we stand, and what we stand for.
It’s time to say no to any more continuing resolutions. It’s time to
come up with an agreed upon budget for fiscal year 2012, even if the
government has to shut down until our self-important cowardly lawmakers
can agree on a budget, as required by law.
Don’t let their Alinsky tactics scare you. The government has the
money in the coffers to pay out Social Security and Medicare benefits
and to cover the interest on our debt; and they can pass a continuing
resolution to just cover these if needed, just like they could have the
It’s time for the House and Senate to do what they were hired to do
by the American people; it’s time to pass a budget for the government’s
operation for the rest of this fiscal year.
Contact your Representatives and Senators to tell them to do what
they were hired to do and pass a budget, not another continuing
It’s time to speak up in the public forum any and every way you can.
God bless our veterans. We need to pray that all the freedom and
liberty they fought for, and spilled their blood for, will not be
destroyed by our rapacious self-serving politicians.
Posted November 15, 2011
Yesterday was a good day for America. It will hopefully restore some
much needed faith in our American government when people see that the
political system is working the way our founders intended for it to
Yesterday the Supreme Court agreed to consider the constitutionality
of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, better known as
Specifically they will consider the issue of the forced individual
insurance mandate, the issue of the severability of the mandate, the
issue of whether or not the states can challenge the mandate, and the
issue of the forced Medicaid expansion.
According to a
Kaiser Health Tracking Poll
in October 2011, 51% of Americans have an unfavorable view of ObamaCare,
while only 34% have a favorable view, a low point in Kaiser polling
since the law was passed.
The poll stated that “the change in favorability this month was
driven by waning enthusiasm for the law among Democrats, among whom the
share with a favorable view dropped from nearly two-thirds in September
to just over half (52%) in October.”
This poll is telling us that the American people are starting to wake
up to the true impact of ObamaCare on their lives and the lives of their
families. The anecdotes are out there if we are willing to hear them.
Healthcare costs are rising, not decreasing as promised, and one of the
reasons is the requirements imposed by ObamaCare.
Gallup has been tracking
health insurance coverage in the US
since the first quarter of 2008, and their most recent trends, posted on
November 11th, show that the percent of American adults with
employer-based coverage has dropped from 49.8% in first quarter 2008 to
44.5% in third quarter 2011; that’s a 10.6% decrease in the Gallup’s
More importantly, the percent of American adults with
government-based coverage has risen from 22.9% to 25.1% over the same
time period; and the percent of American adults with no coverage has
also risen from 14.6% to 17.3% over the same time period.
Gallup states in their conclusion: “The health insurance system in
the United States is experiencing numerous changes. Governments and
businesses have and will continue to cut back and/or reform their health
coverage offerings to handle tough economic circumstances, rising
healthcare costs, and requirements of the Affordable Care Act.”
Silly me! I thought the purpose of ObamaCare was so that those who
had no health insurance would be better able to afford it. That’s what
Obama, Pelosi, and Reid promised. Right?
They weren’t lying to us, were they?
If you believe they weren’t lying to us, I have a great bridge in
Brooklyn to sell you cheap.
No. I didn’t think so. Most Americans do believe they lied to us so
that they could pass the legislation, and use it as a way to pay back
their election supporters.
Well, it’s time to overturn the lie! We can only hope and pray that
the Supremes will strike down the entire law, and save the American
people and the American way of life from a slow destruction by a
tyrannical ruling class who could care less about the people and the
lives they ruin.
We have arrived at a fundamental tipping point in the history of
If this law is upheld by the Supremes, then our government will tip
headlong toward absolute despotism, ruling without the consent of the
governed; and only another civil war will be able to bring it back to
the federal republic our founders intended it to be, a government of the
people, by the people, and for the people.
I know in the past the Supreme Court Justices appeared to not
consider the original intent of the US Constitution, as expressed in the
Federalist Papers; but we can only hope and pray that they will listen
to the will of the governed, and strike down ObamaCare in its entirety.
Please make your views known to the Supreme Court Justices now. They
can be contacted at
It’s time to make your views know by speaking up in the public forum
any and every way you can.
Don’t wait! Your children’s way of life is at stake!
Posted November 16, 2011
Why is it that Congressional Republicans have no backbone when it
comes to holding the line on no more taxes and no more spending in the
face of the unrelenting left’s political tax and spend ideology?
They always talk the talk, but they can never walk the walk!
They say whatever they think the Republican electorate wants to hear
about lowering taxes, lowering spending, cutting the deficit, and
cutting the debt, but when it comes to delivering on their promises they
are always hiding in the shadows, too afraid to stand up for what they
The Republican electorate did not send them to Congress to compromise
away the future of America, and the prosperity and security of America’s
future generations. We elected them to office to hold the line against
the progressive policies of the left that are slowly destroying the
fabric of our once great nation.
We have two deadlines looming over the heads of the American people.
This week the federal government needs another continuing resolution to
keep its doors open and funded; and next week the debt super committee
needs to come up with an agreed upon plan to reduce the current 15
trillion dollar debt by 1.2 trillion oven the next ten years.
We’re not seeing anything in the conservative or the liberal news
about any plan to pass another continuing resolution, or even to shut
down the government, in the next two days.
What’s the story? Is everything being done behind closed doors so
that our illustrative Republican leaders can hide from the scrutiny of
the electorate? Are they giving in again to the tax and spend left so as
not to make waves, and show themselves as appeasers and compromisers
willing to sell out their electorate?
An open government does its business in the light of day, under the
scrutiny of the left and the right. Only backstabbers and deceitful
politicians hide behind closed doors in closed sessions, in the darkness
of evil doings.
Our Congressional Republicans don’t even have the courage to stand up
and say what they are doing in the public forum.
That makes me think that they are selling us out again!
We are already hearing rumblings, and proposed ideas are being
floated, about compromises by the Republicans on the debt super
committee to allow the increase of taxes, rather than cutting spending
as originally promised.
Once again our Congressional Republicans are showing themselves too
weak and wimpy to keep their promise of cutting spending, and not
raising taxes. They have no backbone, and no integrity!
I don’t understand how they can look themselves in the mirror, let
alone look the Republican electorate in the eye, after failing to keep
their commitments once again.
And we just let them get away with the lies and the deceit once
Well, I say it’s time to throw their sorry excuse of a human being
out of office the first chance we get. It’s time to say ‘Enough is
enough’ to our Congressional Republicans; it’s time to say ‘You’ve let
us down for the last time!’
It’s time to tell our elected Republican Representatives and Senators
to hold the line against the tax and spend left, to lower taxes, lower
spending, lower the deficit, and lower the debt with real legislation.
It’s time to speak up in the public forum any and every way you can.
Destruction Day Is Coming
Posted November 18, 2011
>As expected, and without any fanfare in the mainstream media or the
blogosphere, the House and Senate both passed another continuing
resolution yesterday to keep the federal government afloat through
I can understand why the Democrats were willing to pass yet another
spending bill, even if it is only for a month, but it’s disappointing to
me that the Republicans, especially the Republican leadership, were so
willing to go along, yet again.
Where was the outrage from the conservative wing of the Republican
party, better known as the Tea Party, in the public forum leading up to
the bill’s passage? Why hasn’t anyone tried to rally the American people
for or against this latest spending vote?
It makes me think that the Congressional Republicans are running
scared of the American people for letting them down continually, and
therefore were willing to pass this legislation under the cover of
darkness, in secret, without any public discussion or public scrutiny.
The majority of the American people are against any additional
unnecessary spending. Congress knows this, and continues to go against
the will of the people in continuing to vote for the madness of out of
When will the madness stop? When will Congress listen to the voice of
the people? When will Congress listen to the voice of rationality, borne
We cannot continue spending ourselves back to prosperity; otherwise
it would have worked for Greece and Italy and the European Union. Are we
ready to follow them down the yellow brick road into socialist oblivion?
Our liberty, security, and prosperity are at stake! Who of us is
willing to look our children and grandchildren in the eye and tell them
that we sold out their future just so we could live the good life on
The day is coming when the tax and spend bubble will burst and the
people of this once great nation will be thrown headlong into anarchy,
tyranny, and full blown depression, worse that anything history has
The higher we fly, the harder we will fall!
If we keep going down this road of fiscal irresponsibility,
Destruction Day is coming sooner that we could ever imagine; and it
won’t be a pretty picture.
It’s time to speak up against more spending in the public forum any
and every way you can.
Failure Is Imminent
Posted November 21, 2011
As the deadline for the debt super committee draws near, just three
days to go, it appears as though the participants are incapable of
coming up with a solution to lower the national debt by 1.2 trillion
dollars over the next 10 years.
The problem is not that they don’t know how. The problem is
ideological! The Democrats want big tax increases as part of the deal,
while the Republicans will only accept small tax increases; that is if
you think hundreds of billions of dollars is small.
If you remember, though, the Republicans said last August that they
wouldn’t accept any tax increases at all. I guess they forgot!
So the great hope of saving the economy set in place by Boehner,
McConnell, Reid, and Pelosi and signed by Obama last August is on the
brink of failure.
Threats of another financial downgrade by the ratings groups,
prognostications of the eventual collapse of the American economy under
the severe weight of the national debt, and the outcries of the American
people cannot get Congress and the debt super committee to come up with
a deal that will really cut the debt over the next 10 years.
Of course, this would be a great laughable comedy of ideologies
played out upon the American people; that is, if the prosperity and
well-being of our children and grandchildren were not at stake.
What makes this so laughable is that the joke is on us, the American
Because the debt super committee was set up as yet another
misdirection by Congress and the President to lure the American people
into a false sense of security. They proposed their great savior,
Captain Washington, who will fight for the financial security and
prosperity of the American people.
(Drum roll.) Captain Washington to the rescue!
However, it’s Captain Washington who got us into this financial mess
in the first place. It’s Captain Washington who cannot stop spending the
American people’s money, even if his life depended on it, which fiscally
And it’s Captain Washington who has perpetrated the real hoax on us,
the American people.
The hoax is that the debt super committee was really going to make
any lasting cuts to the debt, of course. Because all they are really
trying to do, and failing, is to cut future increases to spending.
Let me make this clear for you.
Our current debt is at about 15 trillion dollars. If Congress does
nothing, then the debt will jump by about another 15 trillion to a
whopping 30 trillion dollars over the next 10 years. That’s an increase
of 100% over today’s debt.
The jump is because of the built-in, automatic increases to spending
from year to year, estimated at 7%; increases which Congress and the
President do not count as increases when talking to the American people
about the budget.
So the hoax is that cutting 1.2 trillion dollars from the debt over
the next 10 years, still leaves us with a whopping 28.8 trillion dollar
estimated debt, assuming nothing is done, and business continues as
If Congress really bites the bullet and commits to no automatic
increases over the next 10 years, then the debt will only jump by about
10 trillion to a whopping 25 trillion dollars. That’s an increase of 67%
over today’s debt.
Consequently, the 1.2 trillion dollar debt reduction promised by the
debt super committee will be insignificant, and will not hold back the
onslaught of financial ruin for the American way of life.
This is the hoax perpetrated by Captain America on us, the American
What we need is for the political rhetoric and deceit to stop. What
we need is for Congress and the President to do the right thing for the
security and prosperity of the American people, putting ideology and
We need to cut real spending, with no increases for inflation from
year to year, by at least 1 trillion dollars to just keep the current
debt of 15 trillion steady over the next 10 years.
If we want to really reduce the debt, then we need to cut real
spending by at least 1.5 trillion dollars now; and we should force a cap
on spending to some reasonable percentage of GDP, such as the 18% that
has already been recommended.; and we should force the budget to be
balanced every year, with spending also limited to the number of dollars
actually raised for the year.
We need real solutions to our financial problems now. Otherwise, we
will witness the inevitable decline of the once great American economy
into oblivion; and once that happens, there is no telling what will
happen to our once great country and our once great federal republic.
The only way we the people can effect real change to solve
real problems is to start speaking up in the public forum, by contacting
our Representatives and Senators, and by making our views known in the
public forum any and every way we can.
It’s time for action! Unite or die.
Posted November 24, 2011
We celebrate today as a national day of thanksgiving, a day
originally set aside by George Washington in 1789 “to the service of
that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficent Author of all the
good that was, that is, or that will be – That we may then all unite in
rendering unto him our sincere and humble thanks.”
Today thanksgiving means gatherings of family and friends to eat a
lot of good food, watch a lot of football, play games, and remember how
blessed we are as individuals, as a family, and as a nation. Some of us
even remember to render unto the Lord our God “our sincere and humble
thanks” for all the blessings He has bestowed on us, especially when
For me and my house, today is a day to offer the sacrifice of praise
to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his
name. Today is a day to remember the greatest gift He has given us, His
only son Jesus Christ, and salvation through faith in His name.
Today is a day to remember that even in the most difficult of times
in our life, He is there to comfort us and to guide us through the dark
valleys; and to remember that all blessings and good gifts come from
Today is a day to remember my wonderful wife and our great children,
how important they are in my life, and how empty my life would be
without them. Today is a day to remember my friends, ranging from the
early twenties to the mid-nineties, who enrich my life in so many
Today is a day to be thankful for this and so much more, and a day to
remember to be thankful every day of the year.
May the God of all creation richly bless each and every one of you as
you give thanks to His name.
The Politics of Cain
Posted December 6, 2011
I first heard Herman Cain speak about business and politics a number
of years ago on the Sean Hannity show. I remember thinking that he had
what sounded like very good ideas about how to deal with the liberal
Democrat tax and spend obsession.
Cain was then, and is now, a good speaker in a low key, one-on-one or
boardroom environment. His business background and experience helped him
learn to speak extemporaneously about all sorts of subjects; and for the
most part he comes across as a likable man, someone I would love to sit
talking to in my living room over warm coffee on a snow covered day.
Today, however, on the battlefield of presidential primary politics
the pace and tone are much different, as are the listener’s
expectations. And Cain has been found a little wanting. The depth of his
political knowledge and understanding has been colored by his business
experiences, and he lacks a basic understanding of the political
ramifications of his thoughts and ideas.
But he has interesting and fresh ideas; something many of the
political insiders severely lack.
As we have seen, the American political process can quickly destroy
the reputation of the best of men, and especially those who have secrets
and skeletons hiding in all sorts of places and towns cross our once
Cain got into the presidential primary race with great intentions,
and even some good ideas, but he forgot about the double standard in
modern American politics; he forgot that any indiscretions made by a
conservative Republican in Washington, or by one seeking national
office, will be dragged through the mud for as long as possible by the
left leaning mainstream media, and even the blogosphere, if the story
Bill Clinton was allowed to have as many indiscretions with woman
made public as there were women in his home state of Arkansas and the
left leaning mainstream media downplayed it, or even ignored it; but
Herman Cain, a conservative Republican, is hammered day and night by the
same media pretending to be fair and balanced and representing the best
interests of the American people’s right to know.
Back in the early days of presidential politics, the media drew sides
and everyone knew which side each was on. In fact, Jefferson and
Hamilton created and supported the media on their side of the political
battle. Unfortunately today the media is mostly one sided, on the left,
in support of the Democrats, and the Republicans get left holding the
Today, Republicans with indiscretions cannot run for public office,
unless of course their indiscretions have already been aired by the
media, as in the case of Newt Gingrich, and won’t get any more traction
with the American people.
It doesn’t seem fair, does it?
You might think that the losers in the American political process are
men like Cain, who are trying to break through a number of political
barriers at the same time. He’s a businessman who thinks that business
basics will help the current woes of Washington politics, and he’s a
black man who has conservative Republican values.
That’s two strikes against him before he even started gaining
attention on the national stage.
Both are hated by Washington Democrat insiders and need to be stomped
on and destroyed before the American people realize that there may be
some merit to this type of change, to using different tactics and
strategies to solve our current staggering political problems.
Don’t get me wrong! I am not supporting Cain’s apparently adulterous
behavior. I am one of the remaining few in our once great country who
thinks character and integrity really does matter in politicians, as it
does in you and I.
Nor am I supporting Cain’s ideas for fixing the economy, like his
9-9-9 plan. I believe it is extremely dangerous to give Washington
politicians a new and additional method of taxing the hard working, and
the struggling, American people. I don’t think a new value-added tax is
a sane way to try to fix our long term debt and deficit issues.
However, I do believe that Cain should not have been silenced,
shuffled aside, and marginalized the way the left has done. Cain’s ideas
belong in the public debate. They are healthy ideas and can stimulate
others to think of new and creative ways to solve the financial problems
facing this once great country.
The timing may have just been coincidental, but it was Cain making
his 9-9-9 plan public that seems to have caused Perry, and Gingrich, and
even McCain and company to come up with other potentially better ideas
for curbing the national debt and deficit.
Good ideas are like the silver ball in a pinball game; it needs to
get knocked around by many good minds before it is good enough to gain
us the high point score on the machine, and solve the difficult economic
problems facing America today.
This is why I continue to urge every one of you to speak up in the
public forum any and every way you can. Our once great country needs
more good ideas to get kicked around until some of them become great
ideas to help get us back on the right track financially, politically,
The Politics of Obama
Posted December 7, 2011
Yesterday Obama made a
campaign speech at
Osawatomie High School in Osawatomie, Kansas where he presented all his
ultra liberal rationale for why a limited government that preserves free
markets doesn’t work, and has never worked.
This was just another campaign stop made by Obama using taxpayer
funds, rather than his own campaign funds; and yet he used it to make
clear the political realities according to his ultra liberal world view.
The bottom line is Obama hates everything this once great country was
founded on: free markets based on supply and demand, the mixing of
capitalism and agrarianism, and the rule of the people through elected
To Obama, free markets need to be controlled so that everyone works
according to their abilities and gets paid according to their needs,
making money is bad, and government officials, like himself, know better
than the masses what’s best for everyone. In Obama’s world freedom and
liberty are at the sole discretion of the ones in charge, the ones who
know best how to distribute them “fairly”.
Let’s take a look at some of the statements in Obama’s speech.
Obama starts out by setting up the straw man to be knocked down,
saying how after World War II everyone “shared the optimism of a nation
that triumphed over the Great Depression and over fascism. They believed
in an America where hard work paid off, and responsibility was rewarded,
and anyone could make it if they tried – no matter who you were, no
matter where you came from, no matter how you started out.”
This was the great American dream, and had been for two hundred
years. This was the great American dream that has been progressively
stomped on and controlled and regulated into non-existence by our own
government in the name of helping the down trodden, fixing the great
ills of society, and leveling the playing field between the haves and
Obama goes on to say that this great American dream “gave rise to the
largest middle class and the strongest economy that the world has ever
known. It was here in America that the most productive workers, the most
innovative companies turned out the best products on Earth. And you know
what? Every American shared in that pride and in that success – from
those in the executive suites to those in middle management to those on
the factory floor. So you could have some confidence that if you gave it
your all, you’d take enough home to raise your family and send your kids
to school and have your health care covered, put a little away for
It wasn’t the greed of those making more money that got in the way of
the lower and middle classes taking home enough money to feed their
families, send their children to good schools, afford doctor care when
needed, or save for retirement.
It was the government programs that started in the middle of the
twentieth century, and continue today, which robbed the families of the
great American dream.
It was government taxation and excessive spending that robbed
families of the money needed to keep up with the growing success of our
post war economy, taking money for food and necessities out of the
pockets of our grandparents and parents.
It was government control of schools that leveled the playing field,
bringing all schools down to the academic levels of the most mediocre,
thereby robbing most American children of the ability to attend a good
school, unless of course their parents could afford a private school.
It is government control of the American medical system, via
ObamaCare and Medicare, which is in the process of destroying our
ability to see the doctor we want to see, when we need to see them, and
to be able to afford health insurance at all.
Early statistics are showing that ObamaCare has forced businesses to
reduce or cut altogether any health insurance that was once provided at
a reasonable cost to the employee. Today more people have no health
insurance due to ObamaCare, rather than fewer people as promised by our
snake oil salesmen politicians who promised how great ObamaCare would
It was government Social Security taxes that robbed workers and
businesses of the money needed to save for their own retirement and
which provided a false sense of security that will never be realized by
retiring workers. Social Security taxes were collected and spent, never
being set aside for use by the retirees. It is the greatest Ponzi scheme
Then Obama went on to knock down the straw man he just set up, saying
“Fewer and fewer of the folks who contributed to the success of our
economy actually benefited from that success. Those at the very top grew
wealthier from their incomes and their investments – wealthier than ever
before. But everybody else struggled with costs that were growing and
paychecks that weren’t – and too many families found themselves racking
up more and more debt just to keep up.
Obama is following the liberal playbook, blaming all America’s woes
on the rich, who they say are exploiting the workers. But don’t fret,
Obama will make them share their wealth with the masses, well maybe just
the masses that are on the left, and everyone else be damned.
Obama goes on to say “for many years, credit cards and home equity
loans papered over this harsh reality. But in 2008, the house of cards
collapsed.” But he forgets to tell you that the house of cards was
really built by government banking policies that forced banks to lend
money to people who couldn’t afford them, and who allowed bank interest
rates to climb out of the realm of the reasonable.
We have people like Carter, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Dodd, Franks, and
many others in our government to thank for the house of cards that came
tumbling down in 2008. But Obama will never admit to it; it’s more
politically expedient to blame the whole thing on the richest 1%.
The haves and the have-nots are not the richest 1% verses the
remaining 99%, it’s those in government verses those not in government.
Then in good Alinsky fashion Obama sets up the crisis that only he
and his government can fix, if only he had another four years to do it.
He says, “But this is not just another political debate. This is the
defining issue of our time. This is a make-or-break moment for the
middle class, and for all those who are fighting to get into the middle
class. Because what’s at stake is whether this will be a country where
working people can earn enough to raise a family, build a modest
savings, own a home, secure their retirement.”
And then “I believe that this country succeeds when everyone gets a
fair shot, when everyone does their fair share, when everyone plays by
the same rules.”
So, can you tell me who is capable of deciding what it means for
“everyone to get a fair shot”? Does it mean minorities get the fair shot
over non-minorities, or the poor get the fair shot over the wealthy, or
the not so bright get the fair shot over the intelligent, or the people
who don’t work very hard get the fair shot over the people who do work
hard, or the non-politicians get the fair shot over the politicians?
The same can be said for who defines what everyone’s fair share
should be, or who defines the rules everyone should play by?
Is it our government who should be allowed to define these? Our
country’s founders believed that it should be the people who defined the
terms, and the government who sorted out the conflicts between people,
states, and countries.
Obama’s ideas, on the other hand, sound like the writings of Karl
Marx in his Communist Manifesto. The foundation of all modern day social
engineering projects by government.
Is Obama and his ultra liberal cohorts who you want running our once
Make your views heard by speaking up in the public forum any and
every way you can.
God bless America and our fighting men and women in all branches of
our military, and especially any remaining veteran of World War II, on
this 70th anniversary of the bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the Day of
Compromise Is Not Always Good
Posted December 16, 2011
Last night Congress came up with a compromise on extending the social
security payroll tax cut and the expiring jobless benefits, and today
they will address the need to extend temporary funding for the federal
I suspect these compromises came about without all the political
party fighting in the media because recent polls of the American people
show that they hold Congress members responsible for the lack of
lawmaking progress this year.
But then the polls show the American people as having so many
different and conflicting positions, that it’s often difficult to know
their true values. I guess it depends on the questions and the
demographics of those being questioned.
The Democrats wanted to tax the rich, those making more than one
million dollars, in order to pay for the social security payroll tax cut
and jobless benefits, but the American public objected. Maybe the
American people are starting to accept the fact that it’s the rich who
actually create jobs, not government.
The compromise that emerged to finance the social security payroll
tax cut and jobless benefits is to charge higher fees by the mixed
public/private organization guaranteeing home mortgages.
Does anyone get the irony of the farce being perpetrated on the
‘Higher fees’ is just ‘increased taxes’ by another name and on
another group of people!
Someone is going to be charged the higher fees. In this case it’s the
people seeking new or rollover mortgages. This financially hurts a group
of people who are already hurting due to the current housing slump; that
is, those seeking to take advantage of lower interest rates by
refinancing their homes, or those seeking to buy and finance a home to
Dung by any other name still stinks when you get close to it.
It seems to me that funding for the extension of the social security
payroll tax cut and jobless benefits should come from spending cuts, and
not from increased fees or increased taxes.
Only by cutting spending can we address the larger issue facing the
American people; that is, the issue of the deficit, averaging 1 to 1.5
trillion dollars a year, and the national debt, currently topping 15
Americans seem to be caught up in the details of the day-to-day
battles in Washington politics, and not remembering the broader issues
facing the country.
We need to be reducing taxes, reducing spending, eliminating the
annual deficit, and eliminating the national debt in order to get our
once great nation back onto the road to economic recovery and financial
This needs to be in the public dialog as we enter the 2012
Presidential primary season starting in January.
Freedom of speech is the right and responsibility of every American.
Speak up in the public forum.
In Search of Sanity
Posted December 18, 2011
What’s this world coming to when our elected Congress members cannot
even send out Christmas cards that actually say “Merry Christmas”? They
can say season’s greetings, happy holidays, but at just the mere mention
of Christmas the political correctness police are up in arms to stop
this age old tradition.
We also see people in towns across America up in arms against the
manger scene depicting the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem
5 to 4 BC. People in towns want crosses and the Ten Commandments removed
from public places.
Where has all our sanity gone?
Removing religious icons doesn’t remove God from reality, or from our
We are supposed to be in a country where free speech is the first of
our rights, guaranteed by our Constitution. But somewhere along the way
people started complaining about religious speech being offensive; that
is, Christian religious speech, since any other religion’s speech is not
What is so offensive about the mention of Christmas, or of Jesus
Christ, the true reason for the celebration of giving gifts? What are
people so afraid of?
If people don’t believe in God, or don’t even believe that God
exists, why does it matter so much if other people do believe? Why do
they get so worked up over it?
I think it’s because they feel guilty about not believing. They feel
like they are the strange ones, who are missing out on something good
that others have. So they want to stop others from feeling good, if they
The truth of the matter is that they feel guilty because it’s their
conscience making them feel that way. There is something built into
every one of us that gives us a first hand knowledge of God, and a
knowledge of His marvelous works all around us, and inside of us.
This knowledge convicts us that God exists and is the creator of
everything that exists, and when we try to suppress this knowledge then
the conflict arises within us, causing us to lash out against all those
who do believe.
But then why aren’t people as adamant against all religions, and not
just against Christianity?
Well, maybe there is something unique about Christianity that causes
so great a visceral reaction in those who do not believe, so that they
are truly compelled to lash out at those who do. Maybe this knowledge of
the truth is built inside every one of us, so that we instinctively know
it when we hear it.
Maybe it’s the truth that Christianity is not really a religion, but
a relationship with a God who loves us so much that He was willing to
send His Son, His only son, Jesus into the world to show us the kind of
life we are to live to get to participate in a relationship with God;
but the evil people in the world killed God’s Son, thinking they got rid
of their problem.
Then God proved to the world that He is God and raised Jesus up from
If you too want to have a relationship with the one true God who can
do all that I described here, then you can.
All you need to do is confess with your mouth that Jesus is the Son
of God and Lord of your life, and believe with all your heart that God
raised Him up from the dead, then you will be set aside as one of God’s
true children and be able to have a direct and personal relationship
with Him; that is, you will be saved.
It’s time to think about what you are fighting against, and if you
want to keep fighting or meet the God of all creation face to face. It’s
your choice. You decide.
A Merry Democrat Christmas
Posted December 23, 2011
House Republicans walked blindly and boldly right into the political
trap laid before them by their Democrat rivals, thereby giving the
Congressional Democrats a very merry Christmas present, and showing once
again their political ineptitude.
The House Republicans were forced to approve the two-month extension
on the social security payroll tax cut and the expiring jobless benefits
or risk giving Obama enough political ammunition to possibly ensure his
Our seasoned House Republicans, lead down the yellow brick road by
Speaker Boehner, acted as though they were freshman Representatives.
When will they learn how to play the game they were sent to Washington
I know, the Senate and the Oval Office are in the hands of Democrats,
thus making their jobs much more difficult. But, come on, the House
Republicans loose every one of these political battles, even when they
do control both the House and the Senate.
You’d think they’d be smart enough to win one of the battles just one
I, for one, am fed up with their lackluster performance!
The American people need tax relief that can be counted on, tax
relief that will make businesses more comfortable hiring new employees,
not temporary relief that may go away in two months. Businesses need
economic and tax consistency from the federal government in order to
make and execute plans for hiring additional workers.
This is not rocket science!
But what the American people get is political maneuverings that give
the Democrats the appearance of caring about the financially hurting and
out of work Americans, without any of the needed results.
What we need is more jobs for out of work Americans, not rich
politicians who pretend to care about out of work Americans, when all
they really care about is their own jobs and their own growing economic
If you’re fed up with politicians, as I am, then speak up in the
public forum any and every way you can.
Merry Christmas America.
The Israel of God
Posted December 26, 2011
Yesterday was Christmas day, the day we celebrate the birth of our
Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the true Messiah, the day when Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was thoughtful enough to wish
Christians around the world a Merry Christmas.
It was a simple gesture of peace, shalom, from one of God’s children.
It was a sign of God’s ever present love. It was a statement that
touched my heart; and for good reasons, because I was born a Jew in post
war New York to Jewish parents who wanted to have nothing to do with the
God of their fathers.
My mother’s father, on the other hand, was a very religious man, a
Polish immigrant with rabbinical training and experience in the old
country. He was a man who loved God and His word, the Tanach, and spent
every morning reading God’s word and praying God’s prayers.
I know this because there were many days in my early years that I was
able to sit at his feet during his morning ritual of reading, and
prayer, and worship. I would listen to his words and watch his eyes and
facial expressions very intently. I was transfixed by his love for his
God, the God of Abraham. In my young life it was the only true
expression of love I had ever actually seen, and known I had seen.
Afterward, he would take me for a walk and he would talk to me about
God, and how God loved His people Israel very much, and how God’s love
is the life blood of our worship of Him, and of our desire to give
thanks to Him for all we have and all we are, whether great or small,
whether rich or poor, whether young or old.
I was six and my grandfather Jacob was seventy-seven, and that summer
I have carried his teachings with me my whole life, and now I would
like to give some of the love God gave me through him back to the people
of my fathers, to the Israel of God. But there is nothing that I have
that is worth giving but that which was given to me. God’s truth!
The Messiah was first promised in the Garden
after the fall when God said to the serpent
“Because thou hast done this, thou art
cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly
shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: And I will put
enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall
bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” (Genesis 3:14-15)
Next the Messiah was promised to Abram, later called Abraham, when
God promised to make him a great nation and a blessing, when He said
“and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.” (Genesis 12:3)
God confirmed the promise of the Messiah again after Abraham passed
the test of being willing to sacrifice his son Isaac, the son of
promise, in Genesis 22:18; and again to Isaac in Genesis 26:4; and again
to Jacob in Genesis 28:14; and again to Judah in Genesis 49:10 when He
said “The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from
between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of
the people be.”
God confirmed the promise of the Messiah to David in 2 Samuel
7:12-14, which was later validated by Jesus’ lineage (Matthew 1 and Luke
3) and at Jesus’ baptism (Matthew 3:17).
God continues to confirm the promise of the Messiah, who would be
born of a virgin and called ‘God with us’ (Isaiah 7:14), who would take
the government upon His own shoulders and be called “Wonderful,
Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace”
(Isaiah 9:6), and upon whom God would place the iniquity of us all and
who would be brought as a lamb to the slaughter and whose soul would be
an offering for sin (Isaiah 53:1-12).
God tells us when the Messiah would be born, 483 years after Ezra was
sent back to rebuild the city of Jerusalem (Daniel 9:24-25), somewhere
around 5 to 4 BC, which fits with our known history.
God tells us the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2),
would be called out of Egypt (Hosea 11:1), would have His way prepared
(Isaiah 40:3-5), would be preceded by a forerunner (Malachi 3:1), would
be preceded by Elijah (Malachi 4:5-6), would be declared the Son of God
(Psalm 2:7), would have a Galilean ministry (Isaiah 9:1-2), would speak
in parables (Psalm 2:7), would be a prophet like Moses (Deuteronomy
18:15, 18), would heal the broken hearted (Isaiah 61:1-2), would be
rejected by His own people (Isaiah 53:3), would be a priest after the
order of Melchizedek (Psalm 110:4), would make a triumphal entry
(Zechariah 9:9), would be betrayed for thirty pieces of silver
(Zechariah 11:12), would be hated without reason (Psalm 35:19), would be
pierced through hands and feet and side (Zechariah 12:10), would be
resurrected from the dead (Psalm 16:10, 49:15), would ascend to sit at
God’s right hand (Psalm 68:18), and many more.
And so the only gift I have to give back to Mr. Netanyahu and to the
memory of my grandfather is the gift of the Messiah, the birth of whom
is celebrated every Christmas by believing Christians around the world.
This Jesus, who was born to a virgin, lived a sinless life, died on
the cross for our sins, was buried in a rich man’s tomb, was raised to
life after three days and three nights, and ascended into heaven to sit
down at the right hand of the Father, is the promised Messiah.
If you believe in your heart these things and that He was raised from
the dead, and if you confess with your mouth that He is the Lord our
God, then you will be saved and dwell with God for all eternity.
© Copyright Notice
The writings on this web page have been gifted to me by the Lord of all
Creation, and they are posted here for neither fame nor fortune, but rather as
requested by their true author for a gift to all who choose to read them.
If you choose to use them without proper credit to this website, their human
author will definitely turn the other cheek; however, their true author reserves
the right to use any means He sees fit to extract proper payment for their use.